U.S. Navy, R.I.P.

General discussion - Feel free to discuss anything you want here. Firearm related is preferred, but not required
OakRidgeStars
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 14108
Joined: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:13:20

U.S. Navy, R.I.P.

Post by OakRidgeStars »

It's official, what was the greatest navy in the world has been reduced to a spineless pile of P.C. drivel. We might as well lower the flags to half mast and start playing the Village People.

Michelle Obama to sponsor first all-female nuclear submarine, U.S.S. Illinois
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... inois.html

Let's not forget the recent USNS Cesar Chavez or the proposed USNS Harvey Milk.

Time to set a course for FABULOUS!
User avatar
davasmith
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 784
Joined: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 09:22:53

Re: U.S. Navy, R.I.P.

Post by davasmith »

Seriously though the girls will have shortened patrols due to "visitors" each month. What a crock~! I don't mind pink camo on women though, and will be looking for the first edition calendar. There is no shame they will not bare in hopes of getting re-elected. Lol as much as it hurts.....

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
User avatar
SHMIV
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 5741
Joined: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:15:31
Location: Where ever I go, there I am.

Re: U.S. Navy, R.I.P.

Post by SHMIV »

It takes a nuclear submarine to get sammiches to the troops, now?
"Send lawyers, guns, and money; the $#!t has hit the fan!" - Warren Zevon
User avatar
dorminWS
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 7163
Joined: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:00:41
Location: extreme SW VA

Re: U.S. Navy, R.I.P.

Post by dorminWS »

First, if restricting a crew to all men is a no-no, why isn't restricting a crew to all women equally a no-no? That's just another one of those nuances of the liberal mindset that eludes me, I reckon.

Second, (and speaking of the lunar-cyclical "visitor"), it is a well-known fact in all environments where women work closely together (particularly where there is stress in the workplace) that they tend to "synchronize" over time. In the closed environment of the submarine, I can only imagine that would be a more pronounced phenomenon (all those hormone-generated pheromones bottled up and repeatedly recycled in a submerged sub, no doubt). Posit a deployment of several lunar cycles' duration. With that in mind, now cast your imagination in the direction of the mass-hysteria-like effect of all that concentrated PMS bitchiness in charge of a nuclear-armed warship.

HAS THE NAVY LOST ITS FREAKIN' MIND?????
"The Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every government, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference." -Thomas Jefferson
Gun-crazy? Me? I'd say the gun-crazy ones are the ones that don’t HAVE one.
User avatar
SHMIV
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 5741
Joined: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:15:31
Location: Where ever I go, there I am.

Re: U.S. Navy, R.I.P.

Post by SHMIV »

dorminWS wrote:
HAS THE NAVY LOST ITS FREAKIN' MIND?????
The enemy succeeds by implementing well organized chaos.
"Send lawyers, guns, and money; the $#!t has hit the fan!" - Warren Zevon
User avatar
jrswanson1
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 752
Joined: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:23:03
Location: Woodbridge

Re: U.S. Navy, R.I.P.

Post by jrswanson1 »

dorminWS wrote:First, if restricting a crew to all men is a no-no, why isn't restricting a crew to all women equally a no-no? That's just another one of those nuances of the liberal mindset that eludes me, I reckon.

Second, (and speaking of the lunar-cyclical "visitor"), it is a well-known fact in all environments where women work closely together (particularly where there is stress in the workplace) that they tend to "synchronize" over time. In the closed environment of the submarine, I can only imagine that would be a more pronounced phenomenon (all those hormone-generated pheromones bottled up and repeatedly recycled in a submerged sub, no doubt). Posit a deployment of several lunar cycles' duration. With that in mind, now cast your imagination in the direction of the mass-hysteria-like effect of all that concentrated PMS bitchiness in charge of a nuclear-armed warship.

HAS THE NAVY LOST ITS FREAKIN' MIND?????
I'm just going to be crude here. Imagine, a sub full of hot women, not a man in sight. Think about it.
User avatar
SHMIV
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 5741
Joined: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:15:31
Location: Where ever I go, there I am.

Re: U.S. Navy, R.I.P.

Post by SHMIV »

According to the following article, the sub will not have an all female crew, after all.

http://militarytimes.com/blogs/scoopdec ... -faux-pas/
"Send lawyers, guns, and money; the $#!t has hit the fan!" - Warren Zevon
OakRidgeStars
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 14108
Joined: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:13:20

Re: U.S. Navy, R.I.P.

Post by OakRidgeStars »

Maybe someone can explain these two...

Cesar Chavez http://www.10news.com/news/31014372/detail.html

Harvey Milk http://moonbattery.com/?p=11880
User avatar
dorminWS
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 7163
Joined: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:00:41
Location: extreme SW VA

Re: U.S. Navy, R.I.P.

Post by dorminWS »

OakRidgeStars wrote:Maybe someone can explain these two...

Cesar Chavez http://www.10news.com/news/31014372/detail.html

Harvey Milk http://moonbattery.com/?p=11880
As someone commented on the linked site, the Cear Chavez to get the brown vote, and the Harvey Milk to get the gay vote.

From the article:
"Chavez, whose family moved from Mexico to modern-day Arizona before it was a state, co-founded the National Farm Workers Association, which later became United Farm Workers. In California, his birthday, March 31, is a state holiday. His widow and six children, along with dozens of other relatives, received a chance to tour the ship earlier."

HMMMMM....... Kind of leaves me wondering if any of them stayed on the ship and are now demanding to be made crewmembers without joining the navy.
"The Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every government, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference." -Thomas Jefferson
Gun-crazy? Me? I'd say the gun-crazy ones are the ones that don’t HAVE one.
User avatar
Palladin
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 4154
Joined: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:06:43
Location: Louisa

Re: U.S. Navy, R.I.P.

Post by Palladin »

jrswanson1 wrote:
dorminWS wrote:First, if restricting a crew to all men is a no-no, why isn't restricting a crew to all women equally a no-no? That's just another one of those nuances of the liberal mindset that eludes me, I reckon.

Second, (and speaking of the lunar-cyclical "visitor"), it is a well-known fact in all environments where women work closely together (particularly where there is stress in the workplace) that they tend to "synchronize" over time. In the closed environment of the submarine, I can only imagine that would be a more pronounced phenomenon (all those hormone-generated pheromones bottled up and repeatedly recycled in a submerged sub, no doubt). Posit a deployment of several lunar cycles' duration. With that in mind, now cast your imagination in the direction of the mass-hysteria-like effect of all that concentrated PMS bitchiness in charge of a nuclear-armed warship.

HAS THE NAVY LOST ITS FREAKIN' MIND?????
I'm just going to be crude here. Imagine, a sub full of hot women, not a man in sight. Think about it.
Rub a dub dub hot wimmin in a sub... :hysterical:
Now is the time for all good men to get off their rusty dustys...
User avatar
meadmkr
VGOF Silver Supporter
VGOF Silver Supporter
Posts: 295
Joined: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:19:48
Location: Sterling VA

Re: U.S. Navy, R.I.P.

Post by meadmkr »

What, no jokes about a woman driver(s) in a billion dollar+ tax-dollar-funded vehicle?
Si vis pacem, para bellum
User avatar
SHMIV
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 5741
Joined: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:15:31
Location: Where ever I go, there I am.

Re: U.S. Navy, R.I.P.

Post by SHMIV »

I was contemplating a woman driver joke, but figured that the sammich comment was bad enough, lol.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
"Send lawyers, guns, and money; the $#!t has hit the fan!" - Warren Zevon
User avatar
DWinter
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 419
Joined: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:19:17

Re: U.S. Navy, R.I.P.

Post by DWinter »

2004 was a great year to retire. Some stuff I just don't miss.

The sammich line was funny as he!! though.
"SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, EITHER STAND BEHIND THEM OR STAND IN FRONT OF THEM".
User avatar
Reverenddel
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 6422
Joined: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:43:00
Location: Central VA

Re: U.S. Navy, R.I.P.

Post by Reverenddel »

I'm thinking, "THANK GOD IT IS NOT CARRYING NUKES!"

MAN! One bad "day", and next thing you know? We glow. And if the Commander has an ex-husband whose a jackwagon?!?! :roll:

Sleep lightly brotha... sleeeeepppp lightly!

Does dis make me a "Wassists"?
User avatar
ShotgunBlast
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 3222
Joined: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 20:46:31
Location: Richmond

Re: U.S. Navy, R.I.P.

Post by ShotgunBlast »

Reverenddel wrote: Does dis make me a "Wassists"?
Since you asked, no, but it does make you seem sexist.
User avatar
Atamisk
Sighting In
Sighting In
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:53:41

Re: U.S. Navy, R.I.P.

Post by Atamisk »

The original story is so full of holes you can drive through it. However, i can hazard a guess that if a single female crewperson was to serve on a VC sub, the whole crew, or a vast majority, would have to be female. Attack subs are just too small to have 'co-ed' accomodatons.
User avatar
Taggure
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:43:59

Re: U.S. Navy, R.I.P.

Post by Taggure »

Do you really think that there is enough experienced female submariners in order to staff the entire crew of a sub?

Females have only recently been integrated into the sub crews, and myself I don't think that there are enough experienced Female submarine officers and crew members to fully staff the sub with all females yet. Now maybe in a few years they will have the numbers, but you are looking at least 4 or 5 years down the road.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."
Thomas Jefferson
SAEPE EXPERTUS, SEMPER FIDELIS, FRATRES AETERNI
(Often Tested, Always Faithful, Brothers Forever)
User avatar
Kreutz
VGOF Silver Supporter
VGOF Silver Supporter
Posts: 4318
Joined: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:26:42

Re: U.S. Navy, R.I.P.

Post by Kreutz »

OakRidgeStars wrote:It's official, what was the greatest navy in the world has been reduced to a spineless pile of P.C. drivel. We might as well lower the flags to half mast and start playing the Village People.

Michelle Obama to sponsor first all-female nuclear submarine, U.S.S. Illinois
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... inois.html

Let's not forget the recent USNS Cesar Chavez or the proposed USNS Harvey Milk.

Time to set a course for FABULOUS!

Nuclear ICBM's rendered large standing forces (naval or ground) obsolete anyway.

Kabul or Baghdad could've been handled in a nanosecond.

Incidentally, how will the women operate a sub when they should all be in the kitchen anyway?
User avatar
DWinter
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 419
Joined: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:19:17

Re: U.S. Navy, R.I.P.

Post by DWinter »

Kreutz wrote: Incidentally, how will the women operate a sub when they should all be in the kitchen anyway?

I have it on good authority that the helm will be installed between the stove and the dishwasher. Multitasking and all that stuff.

(just kidding ladies, I couldn't resist)
"SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, EITHER STAND BEHIND THEM OR STAND IN FRONT OF THEM".
User avatar
skeeterss0
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 816
Joined: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:35:54
Location: Hampton

Re: U.S. Navy, R.I.P.

Post by skeeterss0 »

can we get a film crew on that sub?...would be better than Real Houswives. that many women sealed in an confined space, I can imagine the bitchiness, gossip and catfights.
USMC 1981-2001 Semper Fi

US Constitution
Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”