I like it! The VGOF editorial department has updated the title of the article to read:Remington wrote:---decisively.
"Knife-Wielding Perpetrator Dealt With Decisively"
Now, come on... *that* would sell newspapers!

I like it! The VGOF editorial department has updated the title of the article to read:Remington wrote:---decisively.

Oh wow! The VGOF editorial department must have some clout - check out the headline in that article


Maybe we gather them up and march around Fredericksburg complaining that the Free Lance Star is run by a bunch of whacko's.Remington wrote:That's good reporting. Now what should we do with our printed first editions of the Freelance Star?


Typically, I open carry, so I tend to have my gun strapped on. However, there are some places that I go where my gun is not allowed. In those cases, my holstered gun rides tucked into my split bench seat, where I can easily reach it. Further, I remain aware of my surroundings, and can normally get to movin' should things begin to appear sketchy. Williamsburg is quite the sketchy place.... those little old Yankee women can be SCARY!bryanrheem wrote:
As uncomfortable as it might be, I usually carry on my person when I am in the car. This seems more natural for me instead of reaching across the seat to fumble through the glovebox. At the same time, if I have to leave the car in a hurry, I have the firearm on me.
Thoughts?


What does it matter?lonestarag wrote:Who sits in a car in a hardware store parking lot for 15+ mins?

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>NewColonial wrote:What does it matter?lonestarag wrote:Who sits in a car in a hardware store parking lot for 15+ mins?
lonestarag wrote:Who sits in a car in a hardware store parking lot for 15+ mins?

By "victim", I assume you mean the guy who did the shooting?joeshmo wrote:
If anything the victim did the world a favor...
Yes, he was a victim of a man trying to rob/stab him.SHMIV wrote:By "victim", I assume you mean the guy who did the shooting?joeshmo wrote:
If anything the victim did the world a favor...
From where I sit, I see no victim. I see a predator and a man who refused to be a victim.



Hanging out by a dead man while holding a gun does seem less than wise. However, the dead guy had a friend, remember. Until the police showed up, the reappearance of the friend was a very real threat.FiremanBob wrote:Glad it didn't happen to me, but I would not be "standing next to the vehicle with weapon in hand when deputies arrived."
That could be interpreted as threatening by the LEOs. I would put the firearm on the seat or on my truck's tonneau cover, and be empty-handed when they pulled up.
SHMIV wrote:From Dictionary.com:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
victim
noun
1. A person who suffers from a destructive or injurious action or agency: a victim of an automobile accident.
2. A person who is deceived or cheated, as by his or her own emotions or ignorance, by the dishonesty of others, or by some impersonal agency: a victim of misplaced confidence; the victim of a swindler; a victim of an optical illusion.
3. A person or animal sacrificed or regarded as sacrificed: war victims.
4. A living creature sacrificed in religious rites.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I hate to be nit-picky, but part of the current state of affairs has much to do with a gradual changing of the language; the proper usage of words is important. It's such a small detail, but has large implications.
The guy who did the shooting was intended to be a victim, but he chose not to be. I suppose that one could make a case for either of the two men being a victim, but it's probably best to leave the word out entirely, unless preceded by the word "intended". For example, "The aggressor was justifiably shot by his intended victim."
