Rifle cartridge question

Post Reply
User avatar
TheEqualizer
Marksman
Marksman
Posts: 61
Joined: Sun, 23 May 2010 23:17:54
Location: Oakton

Rifle cartridge question

Post by TheEqualizer »

Why do some cartridges have a two part numbering system, eg. ,30-06, .38-40, .30-30 Winchester, etc?

Thanks,

- andy
"A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves...and include all men capable of bearing arms." - Richard Henry Lee
User avatar
gunderwood
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 7189
Joined: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:28:34

Rifle cartridge question

Post by gunderwood »

The short answer is because that's what they wanted to call it.

There is some historical precedent from the black powder days. E.g. .45-70 was .45 caliber and 70gr of black powder. There also was a .45-90 and .45-120, but with modern powders the .45-70 has plenty of capacity which IMHO is why it is the most popular of the breed.

30-06 was .30 caliber and adopted in 1906. On and on. Why do we call some engines by their liter capacity and other by cubic inches...because we can.
sudo modprobe commonsense
FATAL: Module commonsense not found.
User avatar
Palladin
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 4154
Joined: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:06:43
Location: Louisa

Re: Rifle cartridge question

Post by Palladin »

+1 for on and on!

It's really interesting how the different families of cartridges evolved...

A 30-06 necked down to .25 becomes a 25-06. Neck a .308 down to 7mm, and get a 7mm-08, a little smaller and it's just a .243.

It's also cool how different cartridges perform so much better than others. For instance the little 25-20, necked down from the 32-20 pistol cartridge, can't hold a candle to the ballistics of the .22 Hornet, though looking at them side by side one might think the 25-20 packed more wallop... and on and on.

Get you a couple of reloading manuals, they look great in the basement and on the coffee table :clap:
Now is the time for all good men to get off their rusty dustys...
User avatar
TheEqualizer
Marksman
Marksman
Posts: 61
Joined: Sun, 23 May 2010 23:17:54
Location: Oakton

Re: Rifle cartridge question

Post by TheEqualizer »

I was thinking of getting a reloading manual. I plan to get into reloading some day but I am fascinated by the ballistics aspect and trying to get a deeper understanding of loads.

If you had to get one manual, which would it be?

Thanks.
"A militia, when properly formed, are in fact the people themselves...and include all men capable of bearing arms." - Richard Henry Lee
User avatar
gregj
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 541
Joined: Sat, 02 May 2009 22:02:19

Re: Rifle cartridge question

Post by gregj »

You cant get just one manual, not if you plan on reloading. But the best one for starting out is the ABC's of Reloading.
User avatar
gunderwood
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 7189
Joined: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:28:34

Re: Rifle cartridge question

Post by gunderwood »

gregj wrote:You cant get just one manual, not if you plan on reloading.
+1

At least have a manual for the bullet brands you shoot (if available). Most of the name brand books do a pretty good job of explaining things.
sudo modprobe commonsense
FATAL: Module commonsense not found.
CowboyT
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 986
Joined: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:57:29
Contact:

Re: Rifle cartridge question

Post by CowboyT »

Nope, one manual isn't good enough. Get more than one. With that, I'd say Lyman's 49th Edition is a pretty good one to have. I use it and Lee's "Modern Reloading", and both of these manuals are again checked against the data from the powder manufacturers' Web sites.
"San Francisco Liberal With A Gun"
http://www.sanfranciscoliberalwithagun.com/
http://www.liberalsguncorner.com/ (podcast)
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Freedom ain't free, folks. It takes work.
Post Reply

Return to “Ammunition and Reloading”