http://www.ksl.com/?nid=148&sid=14142743
Out-of-state gun owners seeking a concealed weapons permit in Utah would first have to obtain a license in their homes states, according to a bill approved Tuesday in a Senate committee.
Out-of-state gun owners seeking a concealed weapons permit in Utah would first have to obtain a license in their homes states, according to a bill approved Tuesday in a Senate committee.


Of course not, it means another marketing angle for you to work.ProShooter wrote:I'm not worried. I dont see the changes as being that big of a deal.
Well there's that.Diomed wrote:Of course not, it means another marketing angle for you to work.ProShooter wrote:I'm not worried. I dont see the changes as being that big of a deal.

Is that sarcasm?Diomed wrote:Of course not, it means another marketing angle for you to work.ProShooter wrote:I'm not worried. I dont see the changes as being that big of a deal.


Is it inaccurate?ProShooter wrote:Is that sarcasm?Diomed wrote:Of course not, it means another marketing angle for you to work.ProShooter wrote:I'm not worried. I dont see the changes as being that big of a deal.



zephyp wrote:For many of us here in VA a FL non resident permit is just as good as UT, especially if you keep to the Southeast...let em make their changes. IMO the UT permit is overblown anyway. Major differences are that SC only honors FL resident permit, does not honor a UT permit, but honors a VA permit. FL also only honors a UT resident permit. Only diff I can see between the two is if you go res VA/non-res FL you dont get WI...the FL might be a little more difficult to get but only a logistical issue and non-existent if you visit...

As far as Utah requiring a home state permit, why would it matter to us as a training company?Diomed wrote:Is it inaccurate?ProShooter wrote:Is that sarcasm?Diomed wrote:Of course not, it means another marketing angle for you to work.

