The slow, steady advance of the anti-gun agenda

Post by **OakRidgeStars** » Sun, 12 Dec 2010 16:38:12

This is a glimpse of what will happen once the anti-gun progressives have marginalized the Constitution into just another irrelevant historical document. The freedoms that our Founding Fathers fought for have never been more in danger than they are today.

Time to gird your loins.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/12 ... ions-guns/

VBshooter · Post by **VBshooter** » Sun, 12 Dec 2010 17:06:15

That judge is a fine example of one who should not be in the job in the first place,,,,These days there seems to be far too many of these bench legislators who think their opinion is the way to carry out the law,,,, A gleaming example of why we can;t let our guard down even for a minute...Lest these useless old farts regulate us into oblivion......

dorton · Post by **dorton** » Sun, 12 Dec 2010 17:50:06

Its scary to imagine some of these characters appointed have the last say so for all of us. Thank god Mcdonald vs Chicago was decided in June 2010 instead of June 2011, with the trash we have in there now, things probably would go a little different.

Yarddawg · Post by **Yarddawg** » Sun, 12 Dec 2010 18:00:27

There is no problem, I don't think, for anyone who really wants to have a gun.

He should have stopped after "I don't think".

KaosDad · Post by **KaosDad** » Sun, 12 Dec 2010 18:07:34

"Are you a sportsman? Do you like to shoot pistols at targets? Well, get on the subway and go to Maryland. There is no problem, I don't think, for anyone who really wants to have a gun."

What the hell does this mean? Does this fool understand what he has said?

Post by **OakRidgeStars** » Sun, 12 Dec 2010 18:11:57

KaosDad wrote:"Are you a sportsman? Do you like to shoot pistols at targets? Well, get on the subway and go to Maryland. There is no problem, I don't think, for anyone who really wants to have a gun."

What the hell does this mean? Does this fool understand what he has said?

He definitely brought the phunny with that comment

gunderwood · Post by **gunderwood** » Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:11:04

OakRidgeStars wrote:
KaosDad wrote:"Are you a sportsman? Do you like to shoot pistols at targets? Well, get on the subway and go to Maryland. There is no problem, I don't think, for anyone who really wants to have a gun."

What the hell does this mean? Does this fool understand what he has said?
He definitely brought the phunny with that comment

Is the justice advocating we all become felons?

VBshooter · Post by **VBshooter** » Sun, 12 Dec 2010 20:10:11

I think the good judge (Meathead) was making a suggestion to gun owners in DC to go over to MD instead of having being allowed to have their guns in the sacred city of political BS,Graft ,and rampant stupidity,, Even worse is a lot of these old SOB;s don;t retire either,,,,Something about that power or other perk??

gunderwood · Post by **gunderwood** » Sun, 12 Dec 2010 20:12:29

It isn't just guns, all of liberty is and has been under attack. Slowly but surely Americans are becoming subjects again.

CowboyT · Post by **CowboyT** » Mon, 13 Dec 2010 04:14:49

So what are we going to do about it?

Diomed · Post by **Diomed** » Tue, 14 Dec 2010 06:29:05

Is manifest idiocy grounds for impeachment?

Virginia Gun Owners Forum - VGOF

The slow, steady advance of the anti-gun agenda

The slow, steady advance of the anti-gun agenda

Re: The slow, steady advance of the anti-gun agenda

Re: The slow, steady advance of the anti-gun agenda

Re: The slow, steady advance of the anti-gun agenda

Re: The slow, steady advance of the anti-gun agenda

Re: The slow, steady advance of the anti-gun agenda

Re: The slow, steady advance of the anti-gun agenda

Re: The slow, steady advance of the anti-gun agenda

Re: The slow, steady advance of the anti-gun agenda

Re: The slow, steady advance of the anti-gun agenda

Re: The slow, steady advance of the anti-gun agenda