HRC won't say right to bear arms is a constitutional right

[wittmeba]

Watch: Hillary Refuses Say Right to Bear Arms Is a ‘Constitutional Right’

by Pam Key5 Jun 20163650

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

Sunday on ABC’s “This Week,” Democratic presidential front-runner Hillary Clinton refused to say conclusively the Second Amendment is a constitutional right and that it “is subject to reasonable regulations.”

Partial transcript as follows:

STEPHANOPOULOS: Let’s talk about the Second Amendment. As you know Donald Trump has been out on the stump talking about the Second Amendment saying you want ti abolish the Second Amendment. I know you reject that but a specific question, do you believe an individual’s right to bear arms is a Constitutional right, that it’s not linked to service in a militia?

CLINTON: I think that for most of our history there was a nuanced reading of the Second Amendment until the decision by the late Justice Scalia and there was no argument until then that localities and states and the federal government had a right as we do with every Amendment to impose reasonable regulations. So I believe we can have commonsense gun safety measures consistent with the Second Amendment. And, in fact, what I have proposed is supported by 90% of the American people and more than 75% of responsible gun owners. So that is exactly what I think is Constitutionally permissible. And once again, you have Donald Trump just making outright fabrications accusing me of something that is absolutely untrue. But I’m going to continue to speak out for comprehensive background check, closing the gun show loophole, closing the online loophole, closing the so-called Charleston loophole, reversing the bill that Senator Sanders voted for and I voted against giving immunity from liability to gun makers and sellers. I think all of that can and should be done and it is in my view consistent with the Constitution.

STEPHANOPOULOS: And the Heller decision also says there can be some restricts but that’s not what I asked. Do you believe their conclusion an individual’s right to bear arms is a Constitutional right?

CLINTON: If it is a Constitutional right, then it like every other Constitutional right is subject to reasonable regulations. And what people have done with that decision is to take it as far as they possibly can and reject what has been our history from the very beginning of the republic where some of the earliest laws were about firearms. So I think it’s important to recognize that reasonable people can say as i do responsible gun owners have a right — I have no objection to that — but the rest of the American public has a right to require certain kinds of regulatory, responsible actions to protect everyone else.”

Follow Pam Key on Twitter @pamkeyNEN

http://www.breitbart.com/video/2016/06/ ... nal-right/

It seems to me HRC believes that higher level office positions have rights to alter laws without the agreement of the people.

We already have "reasonable regulations". What I don't hear are any specific ideas to put in place that will actually reduce crime or fix any issues.

[Ironbear]

It seems to me HRC believes that higher level office positions have rights to alter laws without the agreement of the people.

Hasn't that always been the position of royalty with regard to the serfs?

[kelu]

Paragraph 33 of the Chair’s Summary of the meeting calls for urgent tracking of civilian-owned firearms, recommending that manufacturers be forced by the UN to install “RFID and biometric technologies in limiting the access to the weapon to authorized users only,” with authorized users defined as state actors (UN member nations).

That’s right. As part of the Programme of Action (the foundation upon which the Arms Trade Treaty is built — a treaty nearly half of the U.S. Senate supports), the United States has committed to passing legislation that will require domestic firearms and ammunition manufacturers to equip their products with RFID chips and biometric technologies that will help the government slowly but surely disarm civilians.

That’s not all. At the end of that paragraph, the UN suggests governments look into combining RFID chips, biometrics, with GPS tracking technologies to be sure to prevent regular people from getting their hands on guns.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/co ... ent-agenda

[thekinetic]

*sigh* What an idiot!

[Snakester]

Watching "The Five" ...The "left " must think we are soooo Stupid when Juan Williams has to explain to us what exactly Hilary was really saying !!

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

[SHMIV]

I may talk like a redneck, dress like a redneck, and hold a redneck occupation. I even lived in a beat up old motorhome parked in Walmart parking lot for a time.

But, I know how to read. I can comprehend the English language when I hear it spoken.

I know damn well what Hillary said, and what she meant when she said it.

She's playing directly to her base, which has been programed to play into her hands. I just hope that, in a few months, her base turns out to be smaller than she thinks it is.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

[Swampman]

A "nuanced reading of the Second Amendment?" WTF is wrong with her? Can that stupid wench even define "nuanced?" I doubt it.