He rebuts Leftists opinion that the framers of the Constitution only meant muskets.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=p ... quUBWHU2_s
A comedian re: Muskets and the 2nd Ammendment
- AlanM
- Sharp Shooter

- Posts: 1842
- Joined: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 11:05:15
- Location: Charlottesville now. Was Stow, OH
A comedian re: Muskets and the 2nd Ammendment
AlanM
There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men. - RAH
Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo - use in that order.
If you aren't part of the solution, then you obviously weren't properly dissolved.
There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men. - RAH
Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo - use in that order.
If you aren't part of the solution, then you obviously weren't properly dissolved.
Re: A comedian re: Muskets and the 2nd Ammendment
I always respond, that freedom of speech then only applies to hand written messages on parchment with a quill pen, or from your own voice when standing on an apple crate in the town square... and they get real quiet.
- trailrunner
- Sharp Shooter

- Posts: 459
- Joined: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 11:50:44
- Location: Springfield VA
Re: A comedian re: Muskets and the 2nd Ammendment
I've used that argument too.jdonovan wrote:I always respond, that freedom of speech then only applies to hand written messages on parchment with a quill pen, or from your own voice when standing on an apple crate in the town square... and they get real quiet.
I've also used the argument that if waiting periods are an acceptable infringement on our 2nd amendment rights, then a waiting period for the news media to publish a story would also be acceptable, unless it's for a sporting event. Nobody *needs* the news that quickly. Likewise background checks for reporters, too. Twitter accounts should be limited to 30 people, except in CA, NY, MD, and MA, where they should be limited to 10 followers. Nobody *needs* more followers than that. These reasonable restrictions are even more important today, in the current age of high-capacity internet bandwidths, which the founding fathers could never have dreamed of when they wrote the 1st amendment.
- Reverenddel
- VGOF Gold Supporter

- Posts: 6422
- Joined: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:43:00
- Location: Central VA
