A comedian re: Muskets and the 2nd Ammendment

General discussion - Feel free to discuss anything you want here. Firearm related is preferred, but not required
Post Reply
User avatar
AlanM
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 1842
Joined: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 11:05:15
Location: Charlottesville now. Was Stow, OH

A comedian re: Muskets and the 2nd Ammendment

Post by AlanM »

He rebuts Leftists opinion that the framers of the Constitution only meant muskets.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=p ... quUBWHU2_s
AlanM
There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men. - RAH
Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo - use in that order.
If you aren't part of the solution, then you obviously weren't properly dissolved.
User avatar
MarcSpaz
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 6010
Joined: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:55:20
Location: Location: Location:

Re: A comedian re: Muskets and the 2nd Ammendment

Post by MarcSpaz »

He's funny.
User avatar
jdonovan
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 1961
Joined: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:03:02

Re: A comedian re: Muskets and the 2nd Ammendment

Post by jdonovan »

I always respond, that freedom of speech then only applies to hand written messages on parchment with a quill pen, or from your own voice when standing on an apple crate in the town square... and they get real quiet.
User avatar
trailrunner
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 459
Joined: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 11:50:44
Location: Springfield VA

Re: A comedian re: Muskets and the 2nd Ammendment

Post by trailrunner »

jdonovan wrote:I always respond, that freedom of speech then only applies to hand written messages on parchment with a quill pen, or from your own voice when standing on an apple crate in the town square... and they get real quiet.
I've used that argument too.

I've also used the argument that if waiting periods are an acceptable infringement on our 2nd amendment rights, then a waiting period for the news media to publish a story would also be acceptable, unless it's for a sporting event. Nobody *needs* the news that quickly. Likewise background checks for reporters, too. Twitter accounts should be limited to 30 people, except in CA, NY, MD, and MA, where they should be limited to 10 followers. Nobody *needs* more followers than that. These reasonable restrictions are even more important today, in the current age of high-capacity internet bandwidths, which the founding fathers could never have dreamed of when they wrote the 1st amendment.
User avatar
Reverenddel
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 6422
Joined: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:43:00
Location: Central VA

Re: A comedian re: Muskets and the 2nd Ammendment

Post by Reverenddel »

Touche!
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”