References for Pro Gun Arguments.

[Reverenddel]

References for Pro-Gun Arguments. Been having those with Anti's all day, and they cannot refudiate any of the statements.

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/ ... -john-fund#

http://marketdailynews.com/2012/11/27/g ... -firearms/

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/ ... 7J20121107

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/11/cartel/

http://www.firearmsandliberty.com/paper ... mpson.html

http://news.yahoo.com/police-ore-mall-s ... 31596.html

http://www.kgw.com/news/Clackamas-man-a ... 93571.html

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/ ... 7J20121107

[kelu]

I hardly see how the statistics here can be denied:
http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/org ... online.pdf
Throw this study in the face of any hippie and let them chew it.

[JC77]

Thanks Reverenddel. Very useful stuff.

[ShotgunBlast]

The fallacy is that you want to use things like facts and logic to support your argument.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

[Reverenddel]

Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true! --Homer Simpson

[eaglefrq]

Thanks for the great links...

[kelu]

http://www.scribd.com/doc/30546045/Pret ... al-Fiction

[tursiops]

Kelu, those are two great references...to the point, peer-reviewed articles, in legal journals, no less. The other references are mostly just op-ed pieces and are not compelling. The first reference in the OP is good, however, not just an opinion or a quote out of context.

Here is another interesting study from the legal folks....

http://www.culturalcognition.net/projec ... tions.html
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? ... _id=286205