This really steams me. If our president can't muster up the guts for something better than "bad boy bad boy---naughty naughty" for the killing o a US ambassador he does not deseerve that chair he sits in.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]










I understand where you are coming from Shotgunblast. However, I believe Mamabearcali really just wants a better response the oh shucks that sucks. The president should get mad and start asking some hard hitting questions. He should show the world or anyone that would want to harm one of ours that we are not just going to roll over and take it in the ass after they dick slapped us. Now does that mean we need to bomb them into oblivion, that is up for debate... however we do need to respond with requiring a real inquiry, and finding those that are accountable for such a horrible event. We need to see that some one is willing to stick up for Us as a country, and in my opinion it should be the POTUS.ShotgunBlast wrote:Yeah, instead of getting all of the information, seeing what options are available, and developing a strategy let's just turn the whole country into a big parking lot to retaliate for an event that happened 12 hours ago.
This is an interesting situation. Who do you focus those missiles on? It wasn't a government hit. Hell, the government is in shambles. Do you go in and start wiping out the civilians? Go door to door with a simple yes or no question - Do you like the United States and the wrong answer gets a bullet to the head? Are we that type of country now? Big question is why do we still have these people in such unstable countries?
The Roman citizen saying doesn't apply anymore because the world is entirely different now. Back then it was Rome and everyone under Rome's thumb. I bet those people didn't like the way Rome was taking over their lands and treating them. The propaganda line that Mussolini made the trains run on time also sounds great until you see what type of government there was to make that happen. The United States wasn't designed by its founding fathers to throw its weight around like Rome or Hitler's Germany. Now there's an international community you have to deal with. A lot of the international community (and many Americans) are tired of us going into countries. Iraq, Afghanistan, now Libya? When does it end?



"Not to worry, I got this !!! " "Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here." Captain John Parker

That's cool.TacticalMom wrote: I understand where you are coming from Shotgunblast. However, I believe Mamabearcali really just wants a better response the oh shucks that sucks. The president should get mad and start asking some hard hitting questions. He should show the world or anyone that would want to harm one of ours that we are not just going to roll over and take it in the ass after they dick slapped us. Now does that mean we need to bomb them into oblivion, that is up for debate... however we do need to respond with requiring a real inquiry, and finding those that are accountable for such a horrible event. We need to see that some one is willing to stick up for Us as a country, and in my opinion it should be the POTUS.
My two cents... for what it is worth.

When it's all said and done, if that's the best plan, scramble the jets!dorminWS wrote:OK, so our consensus here is that the US should be calm and deliberate, get all of the information, see what options are available, and develop a strategy; AND THEN BOMB THE SH!T OUT OF 'EM!
Good advice, ShotguinBlast.

Krauthammer got it right on this one.VBshooter wrote:Krauthammer Rips Obama Regime For Issuing Apology To Muslims In Egypt After Embassy Attack, Tells Mob To “Go To Hell”… The empty sack apologizes to the friggin Muslims and on 9/11 no less..... The man has to go:> No excuses for that kind of cowardice....http://righttruth.typepad.com/right_tru ... -hell.html






