One reporter in IL has it right

Discussions concerning happenings in other states throughout this great land of ours.
Post Reply
User avatar
AlanM
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 1842
Joined: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 11:05:15
Location: Charlottesville now. Was Stow, OH

One reporter in IL has it right

Post by AlanM »

Firearm carry laws should be federal

I don't agree with him on a federal CC license but I do agree that full reciprocity is desirable.

The comment by Jack Burton after the article is too funny for words. :wink:
It was obviously written tongue-in-cheek but I wonder how many people in Illinois will see the humor, the logic, or the point made.

I can't quote it easily without having to quote all of it so I will leave it to the reader to go read it for themselves. It's the second oldest comment.
http://napervillesun.suntimes.com/news/ ... deral.html

John Lott pointed out this effect in the first edition of "More Guns - Less Crime" and each of the following editions just verified it.
AlanM
There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men. - RAH
Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo - use in that order.
If you aren't part of the solution, then you obviously weren't properly dissolved.
User avatar
VBshooter
VGOF Silver Supporter
VGOF Silver Supporter
Posts: 3851
Joined: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:14:27
Location: Virginia Beach

Re: One reporter in IL has it right

Post by VBshooter »

The fed should not have any part or control whatsoever about carrying a firearm... Once those assholes got control we would have hell to pay to ever get a break again,,,
Some might view this as a state’s rights issue, which it pretty much has been and perhaps should still be, but since the right to bear arms is a Second Amendment guarantee, it would seem to me that the Congress could solve the problem of the patchwork quilt of state laws on concealed carry by passing federal legislation
A bunch of overprivelidged adult crybaby children that can't get anything straight is the last group I want having anything to do with my carrying a concealed weapon.The state of IL has been under the thumb so long they need to clear the air once and for all and remove any and all the crappola that their backward politicians would impose on them..
Image "Not to worry, I got this !!! " "Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here." Captain John Parker
User avatar
Yarddawg
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 991
Joined: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 16:14:28

Re: One reporter in IL has it right

Post by Yarddawg »

it seems to me that the Constitution is already quite clear on the matter, "The right to own and bare arms shall not be infringed".

Carry permits are an infringement!

There are plenty of laws on the books already for those that abuse this right. The problem lies with enforcement of those laws.

Edit to add - This is post 800 for me! Look out DK, I'm coming for ya! :wave:
Engage your brain!
User avatar
mamabearCali
VGOF Bronze Supporter
VGOF Bronze Supporter
Posts: 2753
Joined: Thu, 19 May 2011 16:08:25

Re: One reporter in IL has it right

Post by mamabearCali »

Yarddawg wrote:it seems to me that the Constitution is already quite clear on the matter, "The right to own and bare arms shall not be infringed".

Carry permits are an infringement!

There are plenty of laws on the books already for those that abuse this right. The problem lies with enforcement of those laws.

Edit to add - This is post 800 for me! Look out DK, I'm coming for ya! :wave:

Amen I agree! I really don't want congress to have anything to do with concealed carry. The screw up just about everything they get anywhere near. Right now if you don't like your states laws either work to change them or if you live in IL NY, NJ, or CA move!
"I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend."
User avatar
Jakeiscrazy
VGOF Silver Supporter
VGOF Silver Supporter
Posts: 3519
Joined: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:06:02
Location: Chesterfield, VA

Re: One reporter in IL has it right

Post by Jakeiscrazy »

mamabearCali wrote:
Yarddawg wrote:it seems to me that the Constitution is already quite clear on the matter, "The right to own and bare arms shall not be infringed".

Carry permits are an infringement!

There are plenty of laws on the books already for those that abuse this right. The problem lies with enforcement of those laws.

Edit to add - This is post 800 for me! Look out DK, I'm coming for ya! :wave:

Amen I agree! I really don't want congress to have anything to do with concealed carry. The screw up just about everything they get anywhere near. Right now if you don't like your states laws either work to change them or if you live in IL NY, NJ, or CA move!
+100
The last thing I want is other states whining about how they think our carry requirements are to weak and shouldn't apply to their state. The next thing they'll want to federal CCW with federal requirements(slower and more costly). But if they past that then all you commie states will band together have a big whine fest and get it repealed and no one will be able to carry.
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.”
-Winston Churchill
User avatar
Kreutz
VGOF Silver Supporter
VGOF Silver Supporter
Posts: 4318
Joined: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:26:42

Re: One reporter in IL has it right

Post by Kreutz »

The only way this would work is like drivers licenses, states set their own requirements in regards to age only but must otherwise respect an out of state pistol license.
User avatar
Diomed
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 1891
Joined: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:28:14
Location: Central VA
Contact:

Re: One reporter in IL has it right

Post by Diomed »

Kreutz wrote:The only way this would work is like drivers licenses, states set their own requirements in regards to age only but must otherwise respect an out of state pistol license.
Yes, compacts between states would be best, which is basically what we have now with reciprocity agreements. Sure, it sucks that other states can get away with trampling the rights of their own citizens and every other state's citizens, but that would be the norm if we had a properly functioning constitutional republic.

Getting the feds involved is setting yourself up to get shivved in the back a few years down the road. Get the right clowns in Congress and hey presto, everybody's carry laws are like Maryland's, or New Jersey's, or Delaware's (where you have to put an ad in the local newspaper stating that you're applying for a permit - sound appealing?). Allowing the feds into anything is a recipe for bad things to happen.
User avatar
Sensai
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 109
Joined: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 09:54:58
Location: Surry County

Re: One reporter in IL has it right

Post by Sensai »

Wouldn't it be wonderful if the Constitution was actually obeyed? Any and all laws that infringe on the right of law abidding citizens to keep and bear arms is unconstitutional, period! The only question is at what point do you lose that right. Proven criminal activity on your part should be the only thing that could cost you your right to keep and bear arms, not where you live within the various states. There I go dreaming again!
User avatar
lagmonkey
On Target
On Target
Posts: 26
Joined: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:14:51

Re: One reporter in IL has it right

Post by lagmonkey »

AlanM wrote:The comment by Jack Burton after the article is too funny for words. :wink:
It was obviously written tongue-in-cheek but I wonder how many people in Illinois will see the humor, the logic, or the point made.
Jack Burton's response was pure brilliance and, like you, I am wondering if his sense of humor is sailing over more than a few heads.
"Don't get all your information from the mainstream media. Do a little digging on your own and Dr. Paul just might cure your apathy like he did mine."
- Unknown (but very wise) Author
User avatar
JayDT
Sighting In
Sighting In
Posts: 20
Joined: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 21:44:05

Re: One reporter in IL has it right

Post by JayDT »

If someone even suggested to a reporter than he needed a permit before writing an article, he'd be screaming bloody murder. So why should be carrying a firearm be any different? The 2nd Amendment is a right, not a suggestion. Governments don't want us to have this right because its main reason is for protection from the government.
Our founding fathers were correct -- a large and too powerful federal government is the problem, not the solution.
User avatar
cyras21
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 207
Joined: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 08:04:45
Location: Stephens City
Contact:

Re: One reporter in IL has it right

Post by cyras21 »

I don't think the Fed or States should be involved. The right of the people...SHALL NOT be infringed! How much simpler can it be?!?

If you want to pass some BS legislation on the manufacture and selling of weapons under the commerce clause, so be it; but for any Congress to legislate the "bearing" of arms...when, where, how IS off limits!
User avatar
cyras21
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 207
Joined: Mon, 07 Feb 2011 08:04:45
Location: Stephens City
Contact:

Re: One reporter in IL has it right

Post by cyras21 »

The ONLY way we will EVER get any elected official, Federal or State, to obey the Constitution is to pass an amendment similar to FL regulation that holds the officials PERSONALLY liable and punishable by imprisonment for the infringement of the people's rights.

Think the prisons are overcrowded now?
Post Reply

Return to “National Discussions”