Answer to the last part is, not at all - glad you chimed in. Thanks, I'll take your word for that - I didn't have time to do that research, anyway.Diomed wrote:ATF's not going to care, at least not in published regulation, ruling, or Q&A. The perpetual Pennsylvania trusts I mentioned earlier go through with no problems.user wrote:I'll check up on the BATFE regulations as soon as I get time and let you know. As I recall, there's no problem, but that's just memories, right now. I always have to double check the regs before I do anything.
I'm not sure how familiar you are with the workings of the NFA Branch, ...
Last time I set up a trust, it was to own oil and gas lease interests in West Virginia for people living in Virginia. So it had to meet the legal requirements of both states, and surprise, they're different. So anything having to do with the property is subject to W.Va. part of the trust, and anything having to do with distribution of proceeds is subject to the Va. part.
Having visted this thread again, I re-read the OP's question. I think the answer is, "no" - no one, especially in Virginia where it's illegal for a lawyer to say he "specializes" in anything other than a couple of statutorily recognized areas (Admiralty is one, for example), no one "specializes" in NFA trusts. There are lawyers whose practice is limited to "trusts and estates", and there are tax lawyers (NFA is a tax/revenue provision, after all) who do trusts. But, basically, trusts are trusts. It doesn't really matter what the purpose of the trust is, or what kind of property it has to "contain". If I were looking for a "specialist", though, I'd visit one of those two categories of lawyers - trusts & estates (code for wills and financial planning) or tax.


