Any thoughts on the chambering? He's looking at the cartridges listed above, open to any suggestions (the .17 family).
Trying to keep the rifle/scope combo under $800 - less than that buys more ammo.


If he only has 200 yards to shoot I doubt he has enough groundhogs to notice the difference in ammo cost between a .223 and a .204. Sure it's there, but is $75 all that different than $60..especially after spending hundreds on a rifle? Now noise is another situation all together. I'd look into a .17HMR or .22WMR. Anything super sonic isn't going to be very quite, but the less powder the better.Sensai wrote:Does he reload? It makes a difference. I have rifles in all three of the stated chamberings, but I use my 22 Hornet the most for 200 yards and under. If he doesn't reload, the .223 is the obvious choice. The .204 is a spectacular round, but has all the disadvantages of both of the others. It's as loud as the .223, and has the wind drift of the 22 Hornet. It is also the costliest of the three to feed factory ammo. For a new varmint shooter, I think the .223 in a Savage 110, CZ 527 or Remington 700 would be hard to beat.






Thanks man!VAman wrote:That's a beautiful rifle .