Skidmark Legal Defense Fund

General discussion - Feel free to discuss anything you want here. Firearm related is preferred, but not required
User avatar
allingeneral
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 9678
Joined: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:38:25
Location: King George, Virginia
Contact:

Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund

Post by allingeneral »

gunderwood wrote:
allingeneral wrote:*** UPDATE ***

Paul Henick went to court on 04 January and his case was continued until 15 March 2011. It seems that the prosecutor in the case (the same guy who prosecuted the Michael Vick case) wasn't very prepared and hasn't answered many of the subpoenas and official requests from Skidmark's attorney, Dan Hawes (username "user" on our forums). Additionally, the video tapes of the incident at the Surry Ferry were somehow not removed from rotation and were actually recorded over!
So what you're saying is that the state destroyed evidence which didn't support its case.
That certainly appears to be the case. Sick, huh?
Please consider a DONATION to VGOF to help cover our operating costs

Image
User avatar
VBshooter
VGOF Silver Supporter
VGOF Silver Supporter
Posts: 3851
Joined: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:14:27
Location: Virginia Beach

Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund

Post by VBshooter »

Seems strangely convenient don;t it? After all they can;t have the states hired goons looking bad to the public when they have the chance to nail some poor "Dangerous" gun owner that didn;t do a damn thing wrong.
Image "Not to worry, I got this !!! " "Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here." Captain John Parker
User avatar
9MM92FS
On Target
On Target
Posts: 44
Joined: Mon, 03 May 2010 17:52:48

Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund

Post by 9MM92FS »

I did a search and couldn't find if this has been addressed, but is there any talk, assuming this case gets thrown out, that Skidmark could sue for damages for malicious prosecution? Like they say, money talks and you-know-what walks. Pain in their pocketbook is the only thing that would register with these thugs, so they'll think twice before prosecuting people in the future in similar cases.
User avatar
allingeneral
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 9678
Joined: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:38:25
Location: King George, Virginia
Contact:

Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund

Post by allingeneral »

I'm sure it's being considered, but the first step is to get through the criminal side of it all.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
Please consider a DONATION to VGOF to help cover our operating costs

Image
User avatar
Bernie
On Target
On Target
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:47:42
Location: Staunton

Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund

Post by Bernie »

March is all but over and I would like a Skidmark update.
:tinfoil:
User avatar
fireman836
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 406
Joined: Tue, 08 Sep 2009 12:10:56
Location: Accomac

Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund

Post by fireman836 »

The trial was continued until April. I think it's on the 15th.
Yes I carry a Bible and a Gun, your point.

Vindiciae Contra Tyrannos (meaning: "A defence of liberty against tyrants")
User avatar
Bernie
On Target
On Target
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:47:42
Location: Staunton

Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund

Post by Bernie »

Thanks for the update. I had to do a search for this post. Maybe it could be made into a sticky or a new sticky started called "Skidmark's Fair and Speedy Hearing".
:tinfoil:
OakRidgeStars
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 14108
Joined: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:13:20

Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund

Post by OakRidgeStars »

This thread will be marked as "Sticky" in the General Discussion section for now.
OakRidgeStars
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 14108
Joined: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:13:20

Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund

Post by OakRidgeStars »

Also, the trial date was postponed to June 21st. There is an updated thread on OCDO as well.

http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/showt ... -June-21st
User avatar
KaosDad
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 1717
Joined: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 19:56:03
Location: Chantilly, VA

Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund

Post by KaosDad »

Takes a long time to fabricate evidence, don't it?
Proud Navy Dad
User avatar
gunderwood
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 7189
Joined: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:28:34

Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund

Post by gunderwood »

KaosDad wrote:Takes a long time to fabricate evidence, don't it?
:hysterical: :hysterical: (2 of 5)...one :hysterical: removed for accurateness of the comment.
sudo modprobe commonsense
FATAL: Module commonsense not found.
User avatar
jannypana
Pot Shot
Pot Shot
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri, 20 May 2011 03:25:03

Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund

Post by jannypana »

Be sure you click the PERSONAL tab, and then click the GIFT button, This will eliminate PayPal taking a cut of your contribution.
User avatar
dorminWS
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 7163
Joined: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:00:41
Location: extreme SW VA

Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund

Post by dorminWS »

Exactly what is the status of this defense fund? I contributed $100 a while back. Do they have an unexpended balance, or are they running on empty?
"The Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every government, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference." -Thomas Jefferson
Gun-crazy? Me? I'd say the gun-crazy ones are the ones that don’t HAVE one.
User avatar
allingeneral
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 9678
Joined: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:38:25
Location: King George, Virginia
Contact:

Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund

Post by allingeneral »

dorminWS wrote:Exactly what is the status of this defense fund? I contributed $100 a while back. Do they have an unexpended balance, or are they running on empty?
I just got a message back from the attorney in this case indicating that the fund is in good shape right now, so no further assistance is needed at this time.

I and many others really appreciate the assistance that has been provided to this point.
Please consider a DONATION to VGOF to help cover our operating costs

Image
user

Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund

Post by user »

It is true that everyone other than the Judge and the VDOT terminal manager are non-white. It is also true that the prosecutor has made a bit of a fuss about it. He claims that the complaining witness used the phrase, "move me, big boy" during the course of a conversation. Skidmark denies ever having said such a thing, but as near as I can tell, none of that has any relevance to the charge of brandishing a firearm. Even if the statement were true, what has it got to do with whether or not Skidmark was "making a shameful and ostentatious display" of his firearm in a way that would make a reasonable person think he was about to be shot? I'm taking that stuff as basically posturing nonsense by the prosecution; psychological warfare, if you will, and best ignored.

Where we are right now is the issue of the lost video data. There are six camera placements around the place where this incident purportedly happened, and the people connected with the case (the complaining witness, the terminal supervisor, and the Surry Co. deputy sheriff) could have saved the digital video data easily, but declined to do so. That video data would show either that Skidmark did, or did not, engage in the physical behavior necessary to establish the offense of brandishing, and is therefore crucial to the case. We demanded production of the data early on, but by the time I'd gotten involved and figured out that it ought to be useful, it was already on the way to being destroyed. I engaged a technical guy licensed by DCJS to examine the machinery to recover the data, which may have been possible at that time, but they wouldn't give us access or even tell us what kind of machinery there was. By the time the Court was in a position to rule on motions and arguments, there was no question that the video data was irretrievably gone.

Now there is a motion pending, to be heard at 9:00 o'clock a.m. on Sept. 13, in the Surry Co. General District Court, to dismiss the case for failure to preserve the crucial exculpatory evidence that the defense needed to be able to prepare for trial appropriately. (By the way, state regulations require that the data be saved for a period of three years.) The burden of going forward with evidence, however, is on the defense as the proponent of the motion. If the court denies the motion, then we will proceed to trial on that same day.
User avatar
allingeneral
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 9678
Joined: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:38:25
Location: King George, Virginia
Contact:

Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund

Post by allingeneral »

Thanks for the update Dan!
Please consider a DONATION to VGOF to help cover our operating costs

Image
User avatar
dorminWS
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 7163
Joined: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:00:41
Location: extreme SW VA

Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund

Post by dorminWS »

Well, 452 miles is a bit far to come and root for Skidmark. But I'll certainly be pulling for the ole boy from out here 'mongst my mountains.

Funny - - - the weight of opinion among those who have traced my family's roots is that the first of our set arrived in Surry County in 1635. But if I've ever been in Surrey county it was briefly and when I was just a boy. Reckon I ought to go there some day and look around - - - but maybe I ought not open carry while I'm at it, huh?
"The Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every government, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference." -Thomas Jefferson
Gun-crazy? Me? I'd say the gun-crazy ones are the ones that don’t HAVE one.
User avatar
Bernie
On Target
On Target
Posts: 48
Joined: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:47:42
Location: Staunton

Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund

Post by Bernie »

Yes.
Thank ya for the update.
User avatar
Pumbaa
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 178
Joined: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:11:23
Location: Virginia Beach, VA

Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund

Post by Pumbaa »

cowards who won't man up and admit their mistake
And since they won't do that they will extract a bit of revenge by trying to bankrupt him!

Just remember though, turnabout is fair play. Karma can be a real b!tch.
Life Member IDPA & GOA. NRA Certified Instructor (Safety, Pistol, Personal Defense)[/center]
User avatar
newdovo
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 504
Joined: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:25:00

Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund

Post by newdovo »

Any updates on this? Is it still on for September 13th?
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”