Castle Doctrine Bill passed?

Contact your Federal or State Representative and Delegates. Send them an email and let them know that you want them to fight for your Second Amendment Rights.
Forum rules
Gun related political postings are welcome here. If it's not firearm related, please don't post it.
User avatar
zephyp
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 10207
Joined: Tue, 05 May 2009 08:40:55
Location: Springfield, VA

Re: Castle Doctrine Bill passed?

Post by zephyp »

GS78 wrote: I sometimes wonder if they really are anti-gun, or could it be they are really pro-control.
Well, I wasnt going to answer seeing how this is one them rhetorical questions, but here goes. These anti-gun politicians dont want us owning guns since they know an armed citizenry is to be feared and might upset their commie take over plans.
No more catchy slogans for me...I am simply fed up...4...four...4...2+2...

Image
User avatar
VBshooter
VGOF Silver Supporter
VGOF Silver Supporter
Posts: 3851
Joined: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 11:14:27
Location: Virginia Beach

Re: Castle Doctrine Bill passed?

Post by VBshooter »

Deeds and this committee are the ones who killed it the last time also. It was pretty much going to be Dead on Arrival but at least it got to see the whole comittee unlike the others that had proxy votes while the Senators? powdered their noses.
Image "Not to worry, I got this !!! " "Stand your ground. Don't fire unless fired upon, but if they mean to have a war, let it begin here." Captain John Parker
User avatar
GS78
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 2133
Joined: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:10:18

Re: Castle Doctrine Bill passed?

Post by GS78 »

ftd wrote:
If the senate violates their own rules
Unfortunately, the full committee voted HB454 down (no rule violation), so it is probably toast, for this year and likely next year. Also unfortunate is the reality that this bill is really not a gun bill, but rather a basic right to self defense bill. Of course, this bill also limits the possiblity of lawyer fees garnered from innocent citizens who "harm" an illegal intruder or other threat to personnal safety.

Good news: The entire VA Senate is up for election NEXT year.

Bad News: We probably won't see this bill again until 2012.
There are some basic rules that all lawyers learn in law school. First, there is a duty to retreat when faced with danger. Second, if the danger finds you in your house there is no duty to retreat, because the presumption is that you've retreated as far as any person should have to. Thus, the castle doctrine (a man's home is his castle) allows defense of habitation as an extension of defense of self. ...


http://crimlaw.blogspot.com/2010/02/cas ... ginia.html





[Of course, this bill also limits the possiblity of lawyer fees garnered from innocent citizens who "harm" an illegal intruder or other threat to personnal safety.]I would venture to say that it also would diminish the ability of defense attorneys to secure large settlements for the unfortunate, misguided young person who lacked appropriate mentoring from a father figure in the home because of some policy implemented by the Republican party, namely and most likely George W Bush, Richard Cheney and or Karl Rove, who found himself so hopelessly unemployed that he was forced to break into houses to attain a sufficient income to get that operation that granny needs so badly...... :whistle: ...maybe the defense attorneys don't want this castle doctrine?
'those who hammer their guns into plows , will plow for those who don't'






"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."...George Orwell
Post Reply

Return to “Virginia and National Politics (Firearm Related Only)”