Threatened with a gun on a public street

General discussion - Feel free to discuss anything you want here. Firearm related is preferred, but not required
Post Reply
User avatar
Swampman
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 3011
Joined: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:28:22
Location: Warren County

Threatened with a gun on a public street

Post by Swampman »

Really? This guy obviously wasn't thinking. I'll be interested to hear the rest of the story.

http://www.wusa9.com/news/local/navy-of ... /264846566

Regardless of the determination by FFX police, this fuels the gun-grabbers. :doh:
Progressives/Liberals - Promoting tyranny and a defenseless people since 1913.
User avatar
trailrunner
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 459
Joined: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 11:50:44
Location: Springfield VA

Re: Threatened with a gun on a public street

Post by trailrunner »

I live in the community next to Burke, and visited my mom in Burke this evening.

This guy is an idiot. He's also an SES, but maybe not for long.

I'm surprised that he wasn't charged for brandishing, especially in Fairfax County. He's also very lucky.
User avatar
wittmeba
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 1686
Joined: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 20:24:12

Re: Threatened with a gun on a public street

Post by wittmeba »

I saw this on the news a couple nights ago. I couldn't believe he was just pointing the gun at the guys in the street (drunk or not) -- while his wife had her back to them trying to settle him down.

I'd sure like to know details if the gun as loaded.

He still should have been sited for brandishing. Didn't see anyone on private property.
A Concealed Weapon Permit is nothing more than a permit to allow a LAC to wear a jacket.
Make America Great Again
M-A-G-A
User avatar
MarcSpaz
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 6010
Joined: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:55:20
Location: Location: Location:

Re: Threatened with a gun on a public street

Post by MarcSpaz »

If that was me or any one of us... we would spend the next year in jail while we wait for a hearing. Then likely get another 4 years on top of that. That ahole could have easily killed one of those kids. And his wife was trying to get him in the house, but she was on the phone (assuming with police) making the same complaints as her husband to whoever was on the other end of the line.

It's amazing that no one was shot.
User avatar
Monkey
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 371
Joined: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 09:27:04

Re: Threatened with a gun on a public street

Post by Monkey »

He should have been charged and arrested. Had the complaint been filed that day, he probably would have.

Aside thought: "Drunk" or not, having an argument and then going back inside the house to get the gun does not play well for you in a court of law.
User avatar
SHMIV
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 5741
Joined: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:15:31
Location: Where ever I go, there I am.

Re: Threatened with a gun on a public street

Post by SHMIV »

Reminds me of Col. Sanders. He was known for similar stunts, back in his day.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
"Send lawyers, guns, and money; the $#!t has hit the fan!" - Warren Zevon
User avatar
AlanM
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 1842
Joined: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 11:05:15
Location: Charlottesville now. Was Stow, OH

Re: Threatened with a gun on a public street

Post by AlanM »

PLEEESE!
Cited: Referenced or ticketed
Sighted: Seen or having sights
Sited: Placed on a certain spot

That's off the top of my head. A dictionary may say it differently.
My point being they are homophones.

I've been sick for a week and spent 3.5 days in hospital so I'm a little testy right now.
AlanM
There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men. - RAH
Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo - use in that order.
If you aren't part of the solution, then you obviously weren't properly dissolved.
User avatar
skeeterss0
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 816
Joined: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:35:54
Location: Hampton

Re: Threatened with a gun on a public street

Post by skeeterss0 »

seems to show partiality by the judge, 2 sets of laws, one for us common folk and one for the privileged upper class. Much like Hillary's non-conviction. Its all about who you know.
USMC 1981-2001 Semper Fi

US Constitution
Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”