New Ban Bill Hits Congress: Targets Semi-Automatic Rifles & Handguns: “To Ensure That The Right To Keep and Bear Arms Is NOT Unlimited”
By: Mac Salvo
In the wake of the Sandy Hook shootings we warned that sweeping changes were in the works for Americans' right to bear arms. It started with ammunition tax proposals, restrictions on firearm accessories imports and most recently Governors began bypassing Congress altogether by banning gun ownership for those on any of the government's many watch lists. The Obama administration has also targeted licensed firearms sellers across the United States by forcing banks to treat them like pornography businesses and impeding their access to transaction processing systems and business banking accounts.
States like California already ban "assault weapons" and outlaw "high capacity" magazines that can hold more than ten rounds of ammunition. But the kinds of restrictive laws that strike at the very heart of the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution have thus far been limited to just a dozen or so heavily liberal states.
Until now.
While Americans anxiously prepared for their Christmas festivities, anti-gun proponents in Congress were hard at work drafting a new bill. If passed H.R. 4269 would literally redefine the Second Amendment as evidenced by the bill's description, which in no uncertain terms clarifies its ultimate goal:
"To regulate assault weapons, to ensure that the right to keep and bear arms is not unlimited, and for other purposes."
The bill directly targets every semi-automatic firearm in the United States including handguns, shotguns, and rifles. It specifically mentions certain firearms and manufacturers, including the popular AR-15 and AK-47 rifles.
Because the law is Federal it would blanket the country with new restrictions, including making it illegal to own any magazine that exceeds a capacity of ten (10) rounds.
And here's the kicker, even if your weapon has a legally-defined low capacity detachable magazine but is modified with any of the following accessories, it is considered an "assault rifle" and would be outright banned in the United States.
Semiautomatic rifle that has the capacity to accept a detachable magazine and any 1 of the following:
"(i) A pistol grip.
"(ii) A forward grip.
"(iii) A folding, telescoping, or detachable stock.
"(v) A barrel shroud.
"(vi) A threaded barrel.
"(B) A semiautomatic rifle that has a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds, except for an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.
"(C) Any part, combination of parts, component, device, attachment, or accessory that is designed or functions to accelerate the rate of fire of a semiautomatic rifle but not convert the semiautomatic rifle into a machinegun.
Click for full text of bill: https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-con ... /4269/text
Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2015/12/new-b ... 30APS0F.99
My Thoughts: Although I don’t think this will pass, I do understand that all it might take is for an another occurrence of a mass killing like the Radical Islamic Muslim killings that happened in San Bernardino a few weeks ago to tip the scales of common sense towards the government taking away some of our second amendment rights really soon.
New Ban Bill Hits Congress
- mmckee1952
- Sharp Shooter

- Posts: 705
- Joined: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 20:39:44
- Location: Cobbs Creek, VA
New Ban Bill Hits Congress
“Those who surrender freedom for security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.”
― Benjamin Franklin
― Benjamin Franklin
Re: New Ban Bill Hits Congress
The real world possibility of a bill like this becoming law is, when another liberal judge gets on the Supreme Court. If a bill like this one is ever passed, it'll be headed through the courts all the way to the top. Add another anti-constitution judge to the panel, & the 2a will forever change.
Personally, I believe if the justices had any integrity at all, all of these 2a infringing bills/laws would be thrown out. For the life of me I cannot understand how "shall not be infringed" leaves so much to interpretation for some folks, especially judges.
side note: I wish they would pass National reciprocity. Besides the fact that would be awesome, & a huge win for gun owners nation wide, I'd love to see the face of our governor, & AG after
Personally, I believe if the justices had any integrity at all, all of these 2a infringing bills/laws would be thrown out. For the life of me I cannot understand how "shall not be infringed" leaves so much to interpretation for some folks, especially judges.
side note: I wish they would pass National reciprocity. Besides the fact that would be awesome, & a huge win for gun owners nation wide, I'd love to see the face of our governor, & AG after
Re: New Ban Bill Hits Congress
VCDL says at least one of our delegates is proposing a new law for VA that would bar the enforcement of any "new" federal gun laws inside the borders of Virginia.
Let's support this by letting our delegates know we want such a law in the state.
Let's support this by letting our delegates know we want such a law in the state.
- mamabearCali
- VGOF Bronze Supporter

- Posts: 2753
- Joined: Thu, 19 May 2011 16:08:25
Re: New Ban Bill Hits Congress
Right now I am not worried about this one. It is a D bill in an R congress. The treacherous R's may not give a darn about us but they do like their majority. To piss off the NRA and millions of gun owners is not going to be a priority for them.
But by all means VA pass that Wyoming like law.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
But by all means VA pass that Wyoming like law.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

"I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend."