Obama to by pass congress and close gunshow loophole
- dorminWS
- VGOF Platinum Supporter

- Posts: 7163
- Joined: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:00:41
- Location: extreme SW VA
Re: Obama to by pass congress and close gunshow loophole
I'm just wondering by what legal theory or maneuver failure to comply with an EO of unconstitutional effect becomes a criminal act. There may be a controlling statute or decision. I just don't know.
"The Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every government, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference." -Thomas Jefferson
Gun-crazy? Me? I'd say the gun-crazy ones are the ones that don’t HAVE one.
Gun-crazy? Me? I'd say the gun-crazy ones are the ones that don’t HAVE one.
- MarcSpaz
- VGOF Platinum Supporter

- Posts: 6010
- Joined: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:55:20
- Location: Location: Location:
Re: Obama to by pass congress and close gunshow loophole
Executive orders only have power over the federal government and how they opperate. That means at the absolute most, he can issue an order on how to enforce law and to what degree. He can't create laws that impact private citizens.
The term "executive power" in Article II, Section 1, Clause 1 of the Constitution, refers to the title of President as the executive. Per this clause, the POTUS must "take care that the Laws be faithfully executed". There is no other clause defining his role as a rule or law maker. Unless the Constitution specifically grants him power in a role or task... or Congress passes a law specifically authorizing the POTUS to take some action, his hands are tied.
Also, an EO still must be constitutional and can be challenged in federal court by both Congress and private citizens. I have read that major policy initiatives require approval from Congress too, but I have not seen a deffinition of "major initiative".
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
The term "executive power" in Article II, Section 1, Clause 1 of the Constitution, refers to the title of President as the executive. Per this clause, the POTUS must "take care that the Laws be faithfully executed". There is no other clause defining his role as a rule or law maker. Unless the Constitution specifically grants him power in a role or task... or Congress passes a law specifically authorizing the POTUS to take some action, his hands are tied.
Also, an EO still must be constitutional and can be challenged in federal court by both Congress and private citizens. I have read that major policy initiatives require approval from Congress too, but I have not seen a deffinition of "major initiative".
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

- dorminWS
- VGOF Platinum Supporter

- Posts: 7163
- Joined: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:00:41
- Location: extreme SW VA
Re: Obama to by pass congress and close gunshow loophole
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>MarcSpaz wrote:Executive orders only have power over the federal government and how they opperate. That means at the absolute most, he can issue an order on how to enforce law and to what degree. He can't create laws that impact private citizens.
The term "executive power" in Article II, Section 1, Clause 1 of the Constitution, refers to the title of President as the executive. Per this clause, the POTUS must "take care that the Laws be faithfully executed". There is no other clause defining his role as a rule or law maker. Unless the Constitution specifically grants him power in a role or task... or Congress passes a law specifically authorizing the POTUS to take some action, his hands are tied.
Also, an EO still must be constitutional and can be challenged in federal court by both Congress and private citizens. I have read that major policy initiatives require approval from Congress too, but I have not seen a deffinition of "major initiative".
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
That's exactly what I was talking about. The Obamunists may have a real hard time getting a court to convict someone who defies an EO to do a background check on a private sale.
"The Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every government, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference." -Thomas Jefferson
Gun-crazy? Me? I'd say the gun-crazy ones are the ones that don’t HAVE one.
Gun-crazy? Me? I'd say the gun-crazy ones are the ones that don’t HAVE one.