Why no larger .32 and .380?

General discussion - Feel free to discuss anything you want here. Firearm related is preferred, but not required
User avatar
AppleaDay
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 260
Joined: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:09:42

Why no larger .32 and .380?

Post by AppleaDay »

If so many women and older folks are supposedly getting into shooting why don't we see middle/full-sized handguns in .32 and .380?
Sure, there's always a good ol' .38 revolver with mild loads but it seems all of the .32s and .380's recently have been made so dinky that they're uncomfortable to shoot. INHO that's the wrong tack to take to attract and keep new shooters with less beefy arms. The only real attempt I've see along these lines has been the Pavona: a CZ style gun with a .380 option.
Niche waiting to be filled or dead end?

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
User avatar
widefat
VGOF Bronze Supporter
VGOF Bronze Supporter
Posts: 352
Joined: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 15:11:49

Re: Why no larger .32 and .380?

Post by widefat »

It would surely sell well - it could easily be marketed.

Why would'nt I buy one? Increase the size and you're into small 9mm para territory. The felt recoil between a .32, .380, and 9mm medium size pistol is going to be negligible; so why not choose the superior 9mm cartridge? Capacity? fit maybe one more .32 in a magazine?
The United States of America:
Born: 4 July, 1776
Died: 6 November, 2012

I am a Native American. I was Born here.
User avatar
Palladin
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 4154
Joined: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 22:06:43
Location: Louisa

Re: Why no larger .32 and .380?

Post by Palladin »

(@AppleaDay) Have you shot the Pavona?
I wondered about getting one for my missus, but she still handles her S&W like a champ. Wonder what the felt recoil difference between the 9mm and the .380 is?

If the Pavona delivers, and the sales numbers are there, it would seem like it wouldn't be long before knockoffs were on the market.

My mom (80 now) wanted to roll with a semi, but her arthritis and racking slides just didn't make sense. She wasn't having fun and seeing her struggle with it just made me nervous. :) She loves her wheelguns. And she still has a thing about 357 hollowpoints and milkjugs.
Now is the time for all good men to get off their rusty dustys...
User avatar
Ironbear
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 467
Joined: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 12:58:52

Re: Why no larger .32 and .380?

Post by Ironbear »

What about the .327 Federal handguns?

Otherwise some classic stuff...
Makarov
CZ 83
Walther PPK

Is the Beretta Tomcat still produced? (Tip up barrel no racking slide)
My grandfather said, "Always use your head!".
I told him, "I want to pound nails!"
He said, "Best use a hammer instead."
User avatar
ShotgunBlast
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 3222
Joined: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 20:46:31
Location: Richmond

Re: Why no larger .32 and .380?

Post by ShotgunBlast »

My wife didn't like shooting my old Kel-Tec PF9 or my current Glock. She likes the 380 single stacks because she can get her hands around it properly. She really likes the Glock in 380.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
User avatar
FiremanBob
VGOF Bronze Supporter
VGOF Bronze Supporter
Posts: 2083
Joined: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:50:05

Re: Why no larger .32 and .380?

Post by FiremanBob »

PPK and Colt Mustang in .380 are hard to beat.
Author of The 10/22 Companion: How to Operate, Troubleshoot, Maintain and Improve Your Ruger 10/22
1022Companion.com
Project Appleseed Instructor
User avatar
Snakester
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 2649
Joined: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 21:09:50
Location: Dinwiddie County

Re: Why no larger .32 and .380?

Post by Snakester »

A couple weeks ago I bought my sister a RIA "Baby Rock" .380 .She wanted a semi auto pistol for a while to replace her SP101 .357 mag She likes my 9mm RIA but it is just a little large for her to carry all the time . We have shot at least a K rds. and I have to say it is a great shooting pistol and I NOW think the 380 is a pretty impressive round!

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
User avatar
Bailey960
Marksman
Marksman
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 07:45:40

Re: Why no larger .32 and .380?

Post by Bailey960 »

AppleaDay wrote:If so many women and older folks are supposedly getting into shooting why don't we see middle/full-sized handguns in .32 and .380?
Along with the size similarities mentioned there's also the "big truck, little d*ck" symdrome common in America. The .380 is often derided as being under powered. One will often hear stuff about "FBI criteria" etc but as yet I have not found anyone willing to stand up & take two in the chest to prove it's "underpowered". It's often put in the "I'd use it as my last line of defense.....if I had absolutely nothing else". I like to call these "tac-tards", those who feel the need to carry 9,000 round with them everywhere so they're prepared - utterly cluless about any real world situtation. This means a larger .380 likely wouldn't sell - it would always be "well if you're going that size why not get a real caliber?" (like a G42 vs G43)

Also there would be competition from .22 (supply issues ever resolve). Quite a few nice sized .22 (Ruger SR22) that shoot well & have little or no recoil. No useful really for carry but can be a nice introduction for the new shooter.

Now I'm not deriding those who choose a given caliber or calling the .380 perfect - simply taking about those who dismiss the .380 out of hand. I'm makng fun of this sack -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfDjvhsdQoo
ShotgunBlast wrote:........... She really likes the Glock in 380..........
The 42 is fast becoming my favorite. Can do most anything - it's so light which makes it easy to carry & it's fun to shoot. Now I can't say what would happen should I actually find a 43 but at the moment........
It's just my opinion & worth exactly what you paid for it
User avatar
Reverenddel
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 6422
Joined: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:43:00
Location: Central VA

Re: Why no larger .32 and .380?

Post by Reverenddel »

Fireman Bob is correct. I have carried the stainless Colt Mustang with the 7 round mag with extension for years. Don't underestimate the "Toe Popper" guns... they will mess you up!
User avatar
dusterdude
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 1210
Joined: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 11:25:36

Re: Why no larger .32 and .380?

Post by dusterdude »

I like my bersa thunder 380
User avatar
Jeff82
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 209
Joined: Tue, 19 May 2015 09:59:15
Location: Hampton Roads

Re: Why no larger .32 and .380?

Post by Jeff82 »

With advances in ammo JHP's in .380 meet the FBI requirements (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GNtPHYwcDts). .32 is still a 'ball only' affair if you want adequate penetration.

Speaking of guns in that "not micro" size you've got the aforementioned Glock 42 (love my wife's!) and Colt just came out with a retro Pocket Hammerless Model 1903 in .32 ACP!
User avatar
Jeff82
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 209
Joined: Tue, 19 May 2015 09:59:15
Location: Hampton Roads

Re: Why no larger .32 and .380?

Post by Jeff82 »

Regards the Fat Man... what an ejaculator!!
User avatar
MarcSpaz
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 6010
Joined: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:55:20
Location: Location: Location:

Re: Why no larger .32 and .380?

Post by MarcSpaz »

9mm and .380 are identical in diameter... but a 9mm has double the energy. Granted, I don't want to get shot by either, but if I am on the giving end and I am carrying the exact same size weapon and bullet, why not carry a weapon with more stopping power?

And for what its worth, my mother can't shoot the 380 any better than the 9mm or 357 SIG.
Bailey960 wrote:... I like to call these "tac-tards", those who feel the need to carry 9,000 round with them everywhere so they're prepared - utterly cluless about any real world situtation....
When I first decided to carry in VA, I did a lot of "defensive arms" research about crimes involving firearms for self-defense. I found that the majority of self-defense situations occurred at night, in either a mall or gas station/convenient store parking lot, ambush, multiple attackers, and 3 shots fired on average.

If you go by that... anyone who carries more than 3 to 5 rounds is carrying to much... but if you say that, then you sound like an anti-2A Libtard.

Truth is, most of us will never fire a shot. That doesn't mean you shouldn't carry enough ammo to defend yourself in a seemingly extreme situation. I have been in race fights in Florida when blacks traveled in groups of 100+ and would beat up and stab every white person they came across. This isn't fantasy, I lived through it twice. Guess what; you pull a gun surrounded by a group of 20 or 30 people trying to kill you and they are part of a group 4 times bigger than that, you better have a LOT of ammo and it better be good at being lethal and fast.

It just so happens that the first time it happened, a black man who was a small business owner dragged me and my cousins into a store, locked the doors and hid us behind the counter. The second time, some white dude with a pick-up ran a couple people over to get to me, my brother and cousin. We hopped in the bed of the truck and we all took off.

All that said... good idea to walk around with and M4 clone, secondary full-frame sidearm with 3 spare mags, an LBE vest, rifleman sub-load pouch and 10 30rd mags of mixed XM193 and M855? Probably not. Though, It can't hurt to have a full-size 9mm (or larger) and 35 to 50 rounds (which is only 1 or 2 spare mags for most 9mm's.
User avatar
Bailey960
Marksman
Marksman
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 07:45:40

Re: Why no larger .32 and .380?

Post by Bailey960 »

MarcSpaz wrote:.........9mm and .380 are identical in diameter... but a 9mm has double the energy. Granted, I don't want to get shot by either, but if I am on the giving end and I am carrying the exact same size weapon and bullet, why not carry a weapon with more stopping power?..........
With current technology this is fast becoming the point. The biggest point for .380's was size. I mean I can carry my P380 w/ two magguts mags in any pocket no problem - it's tiny. That's 14 w/ in in the pipe = 15 total. With ammo such as Horandy XTP that's a pretty serious load for something that fits in a pocket w/ a total weight well under 2lbs.

On the other hand these days with single stack 9's getting smaller & smaller. As I said it is getting closer to "if they're the same size why not?"
MarcSpaz wrote:.........When I first decided to carry in VA, I did a lot of "defensive arms" research about crimes involving firearms for self-defense. I found that the majority of self-defense situations occurred at night, in either a mall or gas station/convenient store parking lot, ambush, multiple attackers, and 3 shots fired on average.

If you go by that... anyone who carries more than 3 to 5 rounds is carrying to much... but if you say that, then you sound like an anti-2A Libtard........
I'm certainly no anti 2nd & no where near a libtard.........my point was there's a whole bunch of folks who go way overboard. As you mention there's always the outlier but as we all know out of the several hundred K defensive uses each year some 90 what percent don't even involve a discharge = 8 or so rounds will be more than enough. I'm not pro mag limits, that whole idea is stupid.

As I said I'm not coming down on anyone about their choice - just those who dismiss a caliber out of hand. As you said it's rare anyone has to draw, add to that it will likely be up close & personal a .380 with modern ammo will be fine.
It's just my opinion & worth exactly what you paid for it
User avatar
MarcSpaz
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 6010
Joined: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:55:20
Location: Location: Location:

Re: Why no larger .32 and .380?

Post by MarcSpaz »

Bailey960 wrote:I'm certainly no anti 2nd & no where near a libtard.........my point was there's a whole bunch of folks who go way overboard.
Sorry... I didn't mean to imply you were. I'm referring to the idiots in places like CT, NJ, etc. That is the whole take of their lawmakers.

That whole "no one needs more than 5 rounds" BS is based on the same stats I found, I'm sure. So they think that since 99% of defense situations meet that criteria (made up stat, btw), that's the same thing as "every" situation meets that criteria... at least its close enough for them.

I see the point you are making about size vs. energy. We're on the same page there for sure. Geeze, look at the new Glock 43. They are basically last to market with a pocket carry single stack 9mm. They've been around for awhile.

Actually, lets use the G42 and G43; 380 vs. 9mm, respectively. They are both single stack 6+1 shot mags. They are the same length within 1/4". They are the same height within 3/25". They weigh within 5 oz of each other, just 1/3lbs difference. I'm going to go with double the impact energy as long as my inflamed arthritis hands can hold it. And there is a good chance that once I degrade to the point that I can't shoot the 9mm anymore, I likely won't be able to shoot the .380 either.
User avatar
Jeff82
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 209
Joined: Tue, 19 May 2015 09:59:15
Location: Hampton Roads

Re: Why no larger .32 and .380?

Post by Jeff82 »

Realize there is no such thing as "stopping power." Double the energy doesn't mean anything at handgun velocities. As long as a bullet travels 12 to 18 inches and gets reliable expansion you're good to go, one is as effective as another.

Don't forget when working with averages there's just as many below the average as there are above the average. More is always better. After some of the last mass attacks I've committed to caring an extra mag which makes two extra mags now. With what's in the gun I've got 50 rounds. I don't think that's too many if you're looking at a mass attack. They're going to scatter hopefully after the first round anyway.

Sent from my Galaxy S5 Sport using Tapatalk.
User avatar
WRW
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 2554
Joined: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:21:31
Location: 11 miles from Thornburg

Re: Why no larger .32 and .380?

Post by WRW »

Jeff82 wrote:Realize there is no such thing as "stopping power." Double the energy doesn't mean anything at handgun velocities. As long as a bullet travels 12 to 18 inches and gets reliable expansion you're good to go, one is as effective as another.

Don't forget when working with averages there's just as many below the average as there are above the average. More is always better. After some of the last mass attacks I've committed to caring an extra mag which makes two extra mags now. With what's in the gun I've got 50 rounds. I don't think that's too many if you're looking at a mass attack. They're going to scatter hopefully after the first round anyway.

Sent from my Galaxy S5 Sport using Tapatalk.
Yes. The only reason I didn't comment earlier is that the "9" does have better expansion and better penetration with a subsequent greater wound area.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
User avatar
MarcSpaz
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 6010
Joined: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:55:20
Location: Location: Location:

Re: Why no larger .32 and .380?

Post by MarcSpaz »

Don't forget, the extra kinetic energy helps with penetrating thinks like clothes, bone, or even light cover. And yes, a 9mm makes a more critical injury, reducing the drop time, increasing your chance of survival.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
User avatar
Jeff82
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 209
Joined: Tue, 19 May 2015 09:59:15
Location: Hampton Roads

Re: Why no larger .32 and .380?

Post by Jeff82 »

MarcSpaz wrote:And yes, a 9mm makes a more critical injury, reducing the drop time, increasing your chance of survival.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
Not to be arguementive (sp?) but can I see your data on that?

Sent from my Galaxy S5 Sport using Tapatalk.
User avatar
WRW
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 2554
Joined: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:21:31
Location: 11 miles from Thornburg

Re: Why no larger .32 and .380?

Post by WRW »

Interesting that 12" meets the criteria but there is a maximum penetration as well, huh?

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”