"transgender" personnel in the armed forces
- mmckee1952
- Sharp Shooter
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 20:39:44
- Location: Cobbs Creek, VA
"transgender" personnel in the armed forces
Since the military has lifted the ban on so called "transgender" personnel in the armed forces, we can now ask questions like:
(1) Will they still have male/female fitness standards?
(2) Will they still have segregated latrines?
(3) Will they still have different uniforms for male and female service members?
(4) Will they billet service members who [erroneously] self-identity with a different "gender" into rooms with normal service members who are not confused about their biology?
(5) Will they billet service members who [erroneously] self-identify with other service members who are also self-confused about their biology?
(6) Will the American people finally decide that this war by our government against our armed forces has gone too far and will the American people--and the military members themselves--decide that all of this deviant crap the federal government has pushed on the Pentagon cannot be allowed to continue and finally tell the president and the Pentagon, "Hell no we will not allow this! You can take your Communist ass to hell with you! We are going back to the real deal military like Gen. Patton and Gen. of the Army MacArthur led when we won World War II and you and your same sex partners with you and you had better shut up and leave!"?
Note: Hey, America! What the hell is it going to take for you to get out of your bubble and wake the hell up? If you won't stop this crap, then you don't deserve a military to protect your ass anymore!
So let me try and understand this, on one hand Obama wants to cut the Army by 40,000 troops and then on the other hand wants to allow transgender people into the military. How dammed stupid is he? This is beyond asinine to even think of doing something like this to our military and what in the hell is it going to be like on a Naval ship where these people have to live with all the other sailors, I’ve been there and it’s like having 24 people living in a 8x10 sized room, it’s just not feasible.
(1) Will they still have male/female fitness standards?
(2) Will they still have segregated latrines?
(3) Will they still have different uniforms for male and female service members?
(4) Will they billet service members who [erroneously] self-identity with a different "gender" into rooms with normal service members who are not confused about their biology?
(5) Will they billet service members who [erroneously] self-identify with other service members who are also self-confused about their biology?
(6) Will the American people finally decide that this war by our government against our armed forces has gone too far and will the American people--and the military members themselves--decide that all of this deviant crap the federal government has pushed on the Pentagon cannot be allowed to continue and finally tell the president and the Pentagon, "Hell no we will not allow this! You can take your Communist ass to hell with you! We are going back to the real deal military like Gen. Patton and Gen. of the Army MacArthur led when we won World War II and you and your same sex partners with you and you had better shut up and leave!"?
Note: Hey, America! What the hell is it going to take for you to get out of your bubble and wake the hell up? If you won't stop this crap, then you don't deserve a military to protect your ass anymore!
So let me try and understand this, on one hand Obama wants to cut the Army by 40,000 troops and then on the other hand wants to allow transgender people into the military. How dammed stupid is he? This is beyond asinine to even think of doing something like this to our military and what in the hell is it going to be like on a Naval ship where these people have to live with all the other sailors, I’ve been there and it’s like having 24 people living in a 8x10 sized room, it’s just not feasible.
“Those who surrender freedom for security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.”
― Benjamin Franklin
― Benjamin Franklin
- FiremanBob
- VGOF Bronze Supporter
- Posts: 2083
- Joined: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:50:05
Re: "transgender" personnel in the armed forces
Notice that all the recent perversion of our institutions and societal standards is driven by the federal government. The American people know better, but this tyrannical government doesn't care. All of these outrages are part of a grand plan by the "vast, extreme Cultural Marxist conspiracy" to destroy America before the 2016 elections.
Does nobody in the GOP establishment have the courage to speak out against these abominations?
Does nobody in the GOP establishment have the courage to speak out against these abominations?
Author of The 10/22 Companion: How to Operate, Troubleshoot, Maintain and Improve Your Ruger 10/22
1022Companion.com
Project Appleseed Instructor
1022Companion.com
Project Appleseed Instructor
Re: "transgender" personnel in the armed forces
I'm afraid not. On the other hand, some one should pose that question to the Donald.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

Progressives/Liberals - Promoting tyranny and a defenseless people since 1913.
- WRW
- VGOF Platinum Supporter
- Posts: 2554
- Joined: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:21:31
- Location: 11 miles from Thornburg
Re: "transgender" personnel in the armed forces
How long till the public at large is picking up the tab for "reassignment"?
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

-
- VGOF Gold Supporter
- Posts: 14108
- Joined: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:13:20
Re: "transgender" personnel in the armed forces
Why would they speak out against it? Progressives are not exclusive to the Democrat party. Political parties have never been in the best interest of this country and never will be.FiremanBob wrote:Does nobody in the GOP establishment have the courage to speak out against these abominations?
- skeeterss0
- Sharp Shooter
- Posts: 816
- Joined: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:35:54
- Location: Hampton
Re: "transgender" personnel in the armed forces
We already do for prisoners, why not the military???????WRW wrote:How long till the public at large is picking up the tab for "reassignment"?
USMC 1981-2001 Semper Fi
US Constitution
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
US Constitution
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
- WRW
- VGOF Platinum Supporter
- Posts: 2554
- Joined: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:21:31
- Location: 11 miles from Thornburg
Re: "transgender" personnel in the armed forces
Greer.skeeterss0 wrote:We already do for prisoners, why not the military???????WRW wrote:How long till the public at large is picking up the tab for "reassignment"?
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

- WRW
- VGOF Platinum Supporter
- Posts: 2554
- Joined: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:21:31
- Location: 11 miles from Thornburg
Re: "transgender" personnel in the armed forces
Grrr. That was supposed to be Grrr.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

- WRW
- VGOF Platinum Supporter
- Posts: 2554
- Joined: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:21:31
- Location: 11 miles from Thornburg
Re: "transgender" personnel in the armed forces
FWIW, I never liked automatic transmissions.WRW wrote:Grrr. That was supposed to be Grrr.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

-
- VGOF Gold Supporter
- Posts: 14108
- Joined: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:13:20
- allingeneral
- Site Admin
- Posts: 9678
- Joined: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:38:25
- Location: King George, Virginia
- Contact:
Re: "transgender" personnel in the armed forces
Retired Navy Seal "Kristin" Beck who used to be a guy but wants to be a girl who still looks like a guy or the ugliest "woman" I've ever seen says:
Kristin Beck - facebook
I have been working on this since 2013....
THEY are following the PLAN that I laid out in 2014.
First two steps are done.
NOW the step is setting up a panel of SMEs and Pentagon Policy, Health Care, Personnel..... The work has JUST now begun in ernest and all of your concerns are OUR concerns.
Yesterday at 7:02pm · Like · 7
- WRW
- VGOF Platinum Supporter
- Posts: 2554
- Joined: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:21:31
- Location: 11 miles from Thornburg
Re: "transgender" personnel in the armed forces
I'd no idea that when personal choices (birth control) became mandated coverage that it would go this far. I was against it then, and now...
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

- dorminWS
- VGOF Platinum Supporter
- Posts: 7163
- Joined: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:00:41
- Location: extreme SW VA
Re: "transgender" personnel in the armed forces
Just think............ if we get to the point that health care for the armed services funds "reassignment" treatments/surgery, guess who is likely to flock to the military for that benefit. Oh well, maybe I can get rich if that happens. I could come out with a line of camoflage nail polish and get a no-bid contract to supply the army............ 

"The Bill of Rights is what the people are entitled to against every government, and what no just government should refuse, or rest on inference." -Thomas Jefferson
Gun-crazy? Me? I'd say the gun-crazy ones are the ones that don’t HAVE one.
Gun-crazy? Me? I'd say the gun-crazy ones are the ones that don’t HAVE one.
- VACoastie
- Sharp Shooter
- Posts: 641
- Joined: Wed, 16 May 2012 14:16:13
- Location: Currently - Suffolk, VA
Re: "transgender" personnel in the armed forces
When the determination of repeal of DADT came about, I was REALLY against it. We had to fill out this survey and whatnot of what you felt about it and what concern you had. One often at the time was "I want separate berthings, heads, etc.". Then I realized how ignorant of me that was. It's no different than during Jim Crow days of white and black only things. I quickly got over my homophobic ways and learned to integrate.
With this new transgender thing I see and feel the same as I do now with the gay members. A gay guy isn't going to be interested in me as much as a flat chested chick with an extra part identifying as a dude or vice versa for the females. A work force divided will not fight together when needed and this is exactly what we need I feel.
As far as uniforms go, everything will remain the same. Fitness standards will remain the same. The only thing I'm curious about is how would one be officially deemed "transgender" by military definition? Would they need to be post-op? Does the military provide for the hormone treatments?
The latter I do not agree with at all. The citizens should not be footing the bill for someone's personal life choices. Much in the same that I vehemently do not concur with the military's decision to foot the bill for females to get Breast Implants. Now, if their chests are causing them back/spinal issues then I do think they should be accommodated to get breast reductions. However, if your "feelings" are hurt because your chest is small, to hell with ya. Don't some guys feel bad for having the same issue as a guy? I don't see them offering us the same "enhancements."
I kinda sorta went off topic, but I think it still applies in context.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
With this new transgender thing I see and feel the same as I do now with the gay members. A gay guy isn't going to be interested in me as much as a flat chested chick with an extra part identifying as a dude or vice versa for the females. A work force divided will not fight together when needed and this is exactly what we need I feel.
As far as uniforms go, everything will remain the same. Fitness standards will remain the same. The only thing I'm curious about is how would one be officially deemed "transgender" by military definition? Would they need to be post-op? Does the military provide for the hormone treatments?
The latter I do not agree with at all. The citizens should not be footing the bill for someone's personal life choices. Much in the same that I vehemently do not concur with the military's decision to foot the bill for females to get Breast Implants. Now, if their chests are causing them back/spinal issues then I do think they should be accommodated to get breast reductions. However, if your "feelings" are hurt because your chest is small, to hell with ya. Don't some guys feel bad for having the same issue as a guy? I don't see them offering us the same "enhancements."
I kinda sorta went off topic, but I think it still applies in context.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

- WRW
- VGOF Platinum Supporter
- Posts: 2554
- Joined: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 09:21:31
- Location: 11 miles from Thornburg
Re: "transgender" personnel in the armed forces
Brother Duffer, in Millington, Tennessee, used to preach about the dangers of letting the Devil get his foot in the door. Well, Progressives have a foot in the door and a hydraulic ram in the jamb.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

Re: "transgender" personnel in the armed forces
Look at the choices the trannys will have. If they don't want to stick one in their mouth or other places they can at least get theirs cut off! My God...what has happened to my country?
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
