WASHINGTON (AP) — A unanimous Supreme Court ruled Monday that the government can’t prevent a convicted felon who is barred from possessing firearms from trying to sell his guns after they are confiscated by authorities.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/05 ... h%20Malkin
Supreme Court Makes Major Gun Ruling
-
Greybeard
- Sharp Shooter
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 19:53:09
- Location: SouthCentral PA for now - Northern Neck Forever
Supreme Court Makes Major Gun Ruling
Karl
Years ago it was suggested that, "An apple a day keeps the doctor away." But since all the doctors are now Muslim, I've found that a bacon sandwich works great!
Years ago it was suggested that, "An apple a day keeps the doctor away." But since all the doctors are now Muslim, I've found that a bacon sandwich works great!
-
AlanM
- Sharp Shooter
- Posts: 1842
- Joined: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 11:05:15
- Location: Charlottesville now. Was Stow, OH
Re: Supreme Court Makes Major Gun Ruling
Makes sense to me. He can't legally keep them but if he acquired them legally prior to becoming a felon why shouldn't he get his money (or at least some of it) out of them?
AlanM
There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men. - RAH
Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo - use in that order.
If you aren't part of the solution, then you obviously weren't properly dissolved.
There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men. - RAH
Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo - use in that order.
If you aren't part of the solution, then you obviously weren't properly dissolved.
Re: Supreme Court Makes Major Gun Ruling
They still got it wrong. He should be allowed to sell them because they are his personal property - period. The Court has no business being "satisfied" that he will not be allowed access to them via the new buyer. That issue is already covered under existing law.
~~ Silence is acceptance. ~~
Re: Supreme Court Makes Major Gun Ruling
Another ruling:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... halted-by/
Perhaps the first step towards the end of "may issue"?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 ... halted-by/
Perhaps the first step towards the end of "may issue"?