"War on Women"? Nah, we say arm women!

General discussion - Feel free to discuss anything you want here. Firearm related is preferred, but not required
Post Reply
Mindflayer
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 1966
Joined: Tue, 18 May 2010 20:54:35

"War on Women"? Nah, we say arm women!

Post by Mindflayer »

http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/loc ... /14989333/

It's funny how the gun banners try to depict us as racist and misogynist and then also say people should be disarmed. Clearly, the folks who are truly misogynist are the jack holes that think women can not and should not be able to defend themselves.
User avatar
SHMIV
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 5741
Joined: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:15:31
Location: Where ever I go, there I am.

Re: "War on Women"? Nah, we say arm women!

Post by SHMIV »

Reading the 911 manuscript, I find the mantra off the operator to be bothersome. .. " they're coming as fast as they can". Obviously, that's not fast enough.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
"Send lawyers, guns, and money; the $#!t has hit the fan!" - Warren Zevon
User avatar
dusterdude
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 1210
Joined: Thu, 08 Nov 2012 11:25:36

Re: "War on Women"? Nah, we say arm women!

Post by dusterdude »

Damn shame she didnt kill him
User avatar
Snakester
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 2649
Joined: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 21:09:50
Location: Dinwiddie County

Re: "War on Women"? Nah, we say arm women!

Post by Snakester »

The only mistake, other than shooting him on sight is she did not empty her firearm into that SOB ! :pistol:
User avatar
Lishie
Pot Shot
Pot Shot
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 18:20:50
Location: Woodbridge

Re: "War on Women"? Nah, we say arm women!

Post by Lishie »

I get very concerned when I read these kind of stories. Yes, it ended well, but really by luck and nothing else. He broke into her house, apparently got close enough to "beat on me" that she maintained control of her weapon vs him taking it from her is in my mind, pure luck. I feel women, myself included, are hesitant to to pull the trigger until its potentially too late. I'm glad it worked out as it did, but there's a lot to learn here. Certainly know your target, but don't hesitate too long.
User avatar
Swampman
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 3011
Joined: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 11:28:22
Location: Warren County

Re: "War on Women"? Nah, we say arm women!

Post by Swampman »

Certainly don't let him get that close. When the cops come to scrape his dead keister off the floor and ask what happened, your response is, "I was in fear for my life. I want a lawyer."

BTW - :welcome:
Progressives/Liberals - Promoting tyranny and a defenseless people since 1913.
User avatar
Kreutz
VGOF Silver Supporter
VGOF Silver Supporter
Posts: 4318
Joined: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:26:42

Re: "War on Women"? Nah, we say arm women!

Post by Kreutz »

Mindflayer wrote:http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/loc ... /14989333/

It's funny how the gun banners try to depict us as racist and misogynist and then also say people should be disarmed. Clearly, the folks who are truly misogynist are the jack holes that think women can not and should not be able to defend themselves.
It also galls me the progressives have the nerve to state the poor+elderly will find getting a free ID to vote with is a horrible burden, but would make them jump through hoops of fire to be able to defend themselves in communities with notoriously poor police response times.
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”