http://americanmilitarynews.com/2013/09 ... 0-warthog/

Agreed, but it doesn't need to be. It's the brainchild of some drunk engineers sitting in a bar saying, "Hey... I wonder if we can strap wings and a big engine on a massive gatling gun, armor it up, and fly it!"grumpyMSG wrote:It isn't supersonic
Agreed, but it doesn't need to be. See the drunk engineers notion from above.grumpyMSG wrote:it is not stealthy
Disagree, but that's not needed to be successful. The marketing folks were drunk, too, apparently.grumpyMSG wrote:it is not sexy
Agreed, but the F35 doesn't have the same morale hit or boost the sound a Warthog produces as it introduces itself to a conflict. The impact upon morale is hard to quantify.grumpyMSG wrote:it would probably cost the equivalent of 10-20 of the AF's F35 fleet to keep the couple of hundred of them in the air for the next 20 years