OC question

Open Carry and Concealed Carry. Where did you carry today?
User avatar
ProShooter
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 2176
Joined: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:46:51
Location: Richmond, Va.
Contact:

Re: OC question

Post by ProShooter »

MarcSpaz wrote:Again, I think you may be mistaken my friend. The very first paragraph specifies the weapons that definition applies to, including handguns. Its all one paragraph.

Here is the whole statement.

A. If any person carries about his person, hidden from common observation, (i) any pistol, revolver, or other weapon designed or intended to propel a missile of any kind by action of an explosion of any combustible material; (ii) any dirk, bowie knife, switchblade knife, ballistic knife, machete, razor, slingshot, spring stick, metal knucks, or blackjack; (iii) any flailing instrument consisting of two or more rigid parts connected in such a manner as to allow them to swing freely, which may be known as a nun chahka, nun chuck, nunchaku, shuriken, or fighting chain; (iv) any disc, of whatever configuration, having at least two points or pointed blades which is designed to be thrown or propelled and which may be known as a throwing star or oriental dart; or (v) any weapon of like kind as those enumerated in this subsection, he is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor. A second violation of this section or a conviction under this section subsequent to any conviction under any substantially similar ordinance of any county, city, or town shall be punishable as a Class 6 felony, and a third or subsequent such violation shall be punishable as a Class 5 felony. For the purpose of this section, a weapon shall be deemed to be hidden from common observation when it is observable but is of such deceptive appearance as to disguise the weapon's true nature. It shall be an affirmative defense to a violation of clause (i) regarding a handgun, that a person had been issued, at the time of the offense, a valid concealed handgun permit.

Can you help me understand why you feel a handgun is excluded from the definition of a weapon? It reads to me as they made every possible attempt to include every type of common gun in existence, along with many other commonly know weapons; then said with regard to a handgun a CHP is a valid defense.

I am assuming I am not going to make any headway on this in one direction or another, but I will try again if you are willing. I may have missed something so hopefully we can figure it out. (being sincere.. not sarcastic, I swear) My main concern is that I don't want someone to go to jail because they got bad advice or guidance from me or anyone else on the forum. I mean, we all know this info is "use at your own risk", but still, I feel an obligation to do the right thing.

I am like the doubting Tomas. I need to put my finger in the spear wound (or in this case on a specific piece of code) to be sure its real. I see in the code where it specifically says if you don't have a CHP, the firearm must be either unloaded and wrapped or in a secure compartment or container. However, except for a CHP, I see no exclusions or exceptions that apply to civilians that clearly state I don't have to abide by those two methods. What section of the code lists or implies other exceptions that make it so some can keep their handgun on there person while in their vehicle? Is there other exceptions in another section? I know there are lots or references to other parts of the code.

Maybe case law instead of statutory law? I could have missed it there for sure. I don't typically read case law because they tend to set a standard, but judges and juries do tend to be persuaded away from status quo if a better explanation or if a case is more well presented.

I think you are reading too much into it.

Try looking at it this way.....

18.2-308 A establishes that its illegal to carry a concealed weapon, thus "the law".

18.2-308 B establishes that you can carry concealed in your home, giving you permission to "break the law" in your home.

18.2-308 C establishes some occasions and circumstances where you or a specific person are allowed to carry a concealed handgun without a permit, giving you permission to "break the law" when you are within those circumstances.

18.2-308 D establishes a list of people, who are allowed to "break the law" due to the nature of their employment.

As far as the 2 definitions of concealed - the gun tucked in your waistband, but covered by your jacket is "hidden from common observation." A cane or walking stick that you are using to walk down the street with is obviously not hidden from common observation, but when you draw a sword blade from that cane, then the cane "is observable but is of such deceptive appearance as to disguise the weapon's (sword's) true nature.

I'm not sure that I can explain it past that.
Image

http://www.ProactiveShooters.com

NRA Certified Instructor
Utah State Certified Instructor
NRA Membership Recruiter
NRA RTBAV Instructor
NRA Chief RSO


"Make your gun go to work, and carry every day!"
Stratojaxter
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 110
Joined: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 17:37:50

Re: OC question

Post by Stratojaxter »

This thread is a perfect example of why I recommend a CHP for anyone that can get one. You can't trust common sense to play a part in the interpretation of the law. All of us would agree that simply sitting in the car is in no way an attempt to conceal a weapon. However, many people worry about the one idiot cop or judge that might disagree and uses a strict, letter of the law approach and you end up in trouble. You see stupid court decisions all the time, so I can understand the concern, but I still feel that the odds are in your favor is you choose to OC in a holster on your hip.

By the way, what if I have to take a dump at Walmart? Do I have to leave the stall door open so my weapon is not concealed? :confused: :hysterical:
User avatar
MarcSpaz
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 6010
Joined: Sat, 19 Jan 2013 17:55:20
Location: Location: Location:

Re: OC question

Post by MarcSpaz »

Stratojaxter wrote:This thread is a perfect example of why I recommend a CHP for anyone that can get one. You can't trust common sense to play a part in the interpretation of the law. All of us would agree that simply sitting in the car is in no way an attempt to conceal a weapon. However, many people worry about the one idiot cop or judge that might disagree and uses a strict, letter of the law approach and you end up in trouble. You see stupid court decisions all the time, so I can understand the concern, but I still feel that the odds are in your favor is you choose to OC in a holster on your hip.
This is exactly what I am concerned with. I have sat in courtrooms and watch one person or another get sent to jail because they were a victim of an interpretation of the law that they were not prepared to defend themselves against.

I actually saw a judge put a women in jail for 6 months and had her kids put into state custody for reckless driving. She was charged with reckless based on speed, 83 in a 65. The women did not speak English. She did not have a lawyer or an interpreter while representing herself and the judge would not let her family (who was there) help speak/translate. With the little Spanish I can understand, she kept saying she didn't understand why she was in court. Because she was not able to communicate her case to the judge, she got locked up. It was a pretty crappy thing for the guy to do.
Stratojaxter wrote:By the way, what if I have to take a dump at Walmart? Do I have to leave the stall door open so my weapon is not concealed? :confused: :hysterical:
You must not live in the city. I haven't seen a Wal-Mart commode with a functional door in 20 years. LOL
User avatar
ffemt358
On Target
On Target
Posts: 29
Joined: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:28:44

Re: OC question

Post by ffemt358 »

It seems that cc is more so how you have the weapon secured or displayed on your person rather than how your standing or sitting (in a vehicle for example). I did oc at the Staunton Walmart yesterday, I kept it in the holster (serpa level 2) while driving there and back. No issues at all in Walmart, and after a lot of reading and some input from you good people I decided that if the man was going to get me for carrying my handgun in a holster openly on my side while driving down the road in our caravan with the wife next to me and 4 rugrats behind me then he was just out for blood regardless of where the gun was in the vehicle. If I was stopped I would tell the cop as soon as he approached that I was ocing and where on me the gun was before he even had a chance to say anything.

I think from now on just to prevent a run in with Barney in a bad mood on the day Andy told him he could only have 1 bullet ill just put it in the glove box while driving until I get the permit. I printed out the chp form last night from vsp website and filled it out. ill be taking it to the courthouse today to get this ball rolling. I have every intention of getting a chp, the question was just a until then issue. In my opinion you should carry however, wherever and whenever you legally and safely can. As far as the application, I saw that ssn is optional and read the note about it and decided im not giving my ssn on the application if there is no reason to, unless it will slow down the process, anyone know ? Also has anyone recently got a chp in Augusta county ? how long did it take ? Thanks for all of your help !
User avatar
ffemt358
On Target
On Target
Posts: 29
Joined: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:28:44

Re: OC question

Post by ffemt358 »

I just found a sticky on oc.org about oc in vehicle in va without chp. there were a lot of replies and all of them said that you can keep it holstered while ocing when your driving. They cited actual court cases that were thrown out where the defendant was arrested for having his gun holstered while driving without a chp, they also said that it was rare to be arrested for it in the first place. Another thing in the thread that I found very interesting is it was discussed that not only do you not have to voluntarily inform the leo that you are armed weather oc or cc but several people recommended to not just tell the leo that your armed. The reason they gave makes a lot of sense to me, if you are stopped while ocing in your vehicle and tell the cop that you are armed and he pulls you out and arrests you for cc without a permit because he couldn't see the gun (probably because he didn't look) you should probably get a good lawyer. However if you do not tell him and he has you step out for some reason or he is able to notice your gun while your seated in your vehicle and arrests you for it, when you go to court and the officer says he arrested you for cc and then he is asked how he knew that you were ccing and he says because he saw it, hes going to look really dumb really fast. The simple answer that I got from the guys at oc.org was that if it was oc when you got in the vehicle and its oc when you get out of the vehicle then its oc while you are in the vehicle. A couple members also brought up when they were actually stopped and had gun holstered and there were no issues with the leo.
User avatar
VAStateLEO
Pot Shot
Pot Shot
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:58:27

Re: OC question

Post by VAStateLEO »

I am new here but putting my .2 cents in here
Both Mspaz and Proshooter are correct.

the Law is written to be a bit vague to allow an Law enforcement officer some "wiggle room". but it's all on how the officer may interpret the
law in a particular situation. Out in the country he may ask for the firearm and comment on what a nice firearm it is. in the City well it may go down alot differently. Most City LEOs are not receptive on OC or CC for that matter, some are confronted with a thug and a pistol on a daily basis so you may not find firearm friendly officer there.

For instance if the officer walks up to the driver and he fully states the possession and location of the Firearm he may request the driver to hand him firearm with the opposite of your dominant hand. If right handed, use left hand to remove the firearm and holster and hand it to the officer. NEVER Removed the Firearm from the holster, you will have one pointed at you quicker than you can blink.
and the two will conduct their business and when complete the officer will return the firearm to the driver.

If the driver is in a belligerent demeanor and does not announce the firearm the officer may conduct an arrest if the officer has justified or reasonable suspicion of a class 1 misdemeanor.

The short answer is that the law is written to prevent the firearm from becoming a projectile in an accident or fly out the window and a child picking it up later. The Firearm must be secured while in the vehicle on a holster, glove box or other vessel / container. If stored in such a location the firearm must be unloaded. if Open Carry in holster you don't carry an unloaded firearm, that’s stupid. It is ok to holster Open Carry without a permit just be aware if you get pulled over for a traffic violation be polite, put both hands over the steering wheel and let the officer know you have a firearm and where it's located, DO NOT REACH or POINT TO IT. State the location and that you await his instructions. The Officer must feel comfortable with the situation, let him control each action and do not hesitate or ask why... Just Do It.
In Memory - Master Trooper Junius A. Walker

Image
Concerns of Police Survivors (C.O.P.S.)
User avatar
Chasbo00
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 1819
Joined: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:34:29
Location: Northern VA

Re: OC question

Post by Chasbo00 »

VAStateLEO wrote: The Firearm must be secured while in the vehicle on a holster, glove box or other vessel / container. If stored in such a location the firearm must be unloaded.
What is your basis for saying the firearm must be unloaded? I don't recall this being in the statutes.
Competition is one of the "great levelers" of ego.
User avatar
VAStateLEO
Pot Shot
Pot Shot
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:58:27

Re: OC question

Post by VAStateLEO »

I would always unload the firearm in case you have to swing into Maryland since the law in Maryland requires it to be unloaded, to me it's good practice while transporting a firearm, not holstering it. Your right the law does not require the firearm to be unloaded while in in a container or restraint.

Here is the Virginia OAG's response to these exact questions.. Notice the difference between the law before 2010.

http://www.oag.state.va.us/Opinions%20a ... Newman.pdf

Notice the Office of the Attorney Generals response.

Issues Presented
You present several questions related to the possession and storage of firearms in vehicles by
persons who may lawfully possess a firearm but have not been issued a concealed weapons permit. You
first ask whether a handgun can be loaded inside a vehicle and under what conditions. Your second inquiry
concerns whether a handgun can be within the reach of a driver or a passenger inside a vehicle. You next
ask whether a center console, glove compartment or any other "container or compartment must be locked to
constitute a "secured container or compartment" Finally, you ask whether an individual can keep a firearm
in their vehicle at their place of employment even if there is a company policy or signage stating it is not
allowed.
Response
It is my opinion that, provided the handgun is properly secured in a container or compartment
within the vehicle, persons who may lawfully possess a firearm but have not been issued a concealed
weapons permit may possess, in a vehicle, a handgun that is loaded and the handgun may remain within
reach of a driver or passenger under such conditions. It further is my opinion that, for a handgun to be
"secured in a container or compartment," such storage tool need not be locked. Finally, it is my opinion
that an individual may not keep a firearm stored in his vehicle at a place of employment if there is a
company policy or signage prohibiting firearms on the premises.

While it is the general policy of the Virginia State Police to provide assistance and information to private citizens whenever possible, the Department of State Police does not provide legal advice, opinions, or statute interpretation to private individuals.
In Memory - Master Trooper Junius A. Walker

Image
Concerns of Police Survivors (C.O.P.S.)
User avatar
Chasbo00
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 1819
Joined: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:34:29
Location: Northern VA

Re: OC question

Post by Chasbo00 »

There is now a VA Appeals Court case for this issue that supersedes the AG opinion. A member of this board was arrested and tried and found guilty of having a concealed handgun because he had a loaded handgun in his automobile's unlocked glove compartment. The conviction was overturned on appeal. The conviction reversal and dismissal in this case is completely consistent with the AG opinion.

http://www.courts.state.va.us/opinions/ ... 458122.pdf
Last edited by Chasbo00 on Tue, 27 Aug 2013 22:55:41, edited 2 times in total.
Competition is one of the "great levelers" of ego.
User avatar
ProShooter
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 2176
Joined: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:46:51
Location: Richmond, Va.
Contact:

Re: OC question

Post by ProShooter »

First, welcome.....
VAStateLEO wrote:
The short answer is that the law is written to prevent the firearm from becoming a projectile in an accident or fly out the window and a child picking it up later.
I'm quite certain that the GA did not have traffic crashes or wandering children in mind when they wrote 18.2-308.

VAStateLEO wrote:The Firearm must be secured while in the vehicle on a holster, glove box or other vessel / container.
Absolutely false. I can lay the gun on my seat and there is no violation of law.
VAStateLEO wrote:If stored in such a location the firearm must be unloaded.
Again, absolutely false. There is no statutory requirement for that.
Image

http://www.ProactiveShooters.com

NRA Certified Instructor
Utah State Certified Instructor
NRA Membership Recruiter
NRA RTBAV Instructor
NRA Chief RSO


"Make your gun go to work, and carry every day!"
User avatar
VAStateLEO
Pot Shot
Pot Shot
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:58:27

Re: OC question

Post by VAStateLEO »

Chasbo00 wrote:There is now a VA Appeals Court case for this issue that supersedes the AG opinion. A member of this board was arrested and tried and found guilty of having a concealed handgun because he had a loaded handgun in his automobile's glove compartment. It was overturned on appeal. The conviction reversal and dismissal in this case is completely consistent with the AG opinion.

http://www.courts.state.va.us/opinions/ ... 458122.pdf
Yes, due to confusion with the wording change from the law before 2010. this has been the most confusing part of the new law because how many cars today have locking glove boxes? And again it's Richmond, a large city and the police are not as gun friendly there as they are in Winchester..
I am glad they overturned his conviction because the law is so vague that we could have a 20 page thread on this issue. As a LEO I hate the fact that it's left up to the officer to make that judgment.
In Memory - Master Trooper Junius A. Walker

Image
Concerns of Police Survivors (C.O.P.S.)
User avatar
VAStateLEO
Pot Shot
Pot Shot
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:58:27

Re: OC question

Post by VAStateLEO »

ProShooter wrote:First, welcome.....

I'm quite certain that the GA did not have traffic crashes or wandering children in mind when they wrote 18.2-308.
Actually legislatures always are concerned about keeping firearms out of the hand of kids. My Father was a state legislator and they did debate this issue.
I caught driver that put his firearm on the dashboard, of his vette, a quick turn and the firearm slid across the dash and right out the passenger side open window. I stopped and picked it up and pulled him over, cited him driving to fast for conditions then handed him his firearm... you should have seen his face, priceless
VAStateLEO wrote:The Firearm must be secured while in the vehicle on a holster, glove box or other vessel / container.

Absolutely false. I can lay the gun on my seat and there is no violation of law.
VAStateLEO wrote:If stored in such a location the firearm must be unloaded.
Again, absolutely false. There is no statutory requirement for that.
You are correct on these, and again this is My Interpretations of the Law / and not being up on the new Laws. again too vague
but I am going to say is Use common sense when having a firearm in the vehicle.

State Police Website still shows the OAG's Opinions as the official opinions.
http://www.vsp.state.va.us/Firearms_Transporting.shtm

It's my opinions not that or the State of Virginia, or State police

It is the general policy of Department of State Police to provide assistance and information to private citizens whenever possible, the Department of State Police does not provide legal advice, opinions, or statute interpretation to private individuals
In Memory - Master Trooper Junius A. Walker

Image
Concerns of Police Survivors (C.O.P.S.)
User avatar
VAStateLEO
Pot Shot
Pot Shot
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:58:27

Re: OC question

Post by VAStateLEO »

I am one of a few officers who is Gun friendly and a staunch supporter of the 2nd Amendment for all.
you would be surprised how many Virginia Police officers who are on the fence or against citizens having the same firearms
as police have. This includes Semi-auto hand guns to Service rifles.
In Memory - Master Trooper Junius A. Walker

Image
Concerns of Police Survivors (C.O.P.S.)
User avatar
VAStateLEO
Pot Shot
Pot Shot
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:58:27

Re: OC question

Post by VAStateLEO »

Chasbo00 wrote:There is now a VA Appeals Court case for this issue that supersedes the AG opinion. A member of this board was arrested and tried and found guilty of having a concealed handgun because he had a loaded handgun in his automobile's unlocked glove compartment. The conviction was overturned on appeal. The conviction reversal and dismissal in this case is completely consistent with the AG opinion.

http://www.courts.state.va.us/opinions/ ... 458122.pdf
After reading it I agree with the conclusion
custody,” Webster’s New Universal Unabridged Dictionary 1641 (2d ed. 1983), or
“well-fastened,” The American Heritage Dictionary 1173 (New College Ed. 1982).
The evidence here shows that appellant’s handgun was in a closed, latched and
“well-fastened” glove compartment. Pursuant to the statute, appellant’s gun was “secured in a . . .
compartment” in his vehicle, thus reducing his access to the weapon. Because appellant’s handgun
wasin compliance with the exception to the concealed weapon prohibition, his possession of the
gun did not violate Code § 18.2-308.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, we reverse and dismiss appellant’s conviction.
Reversed and dismissed.
So actually they agreed with the OAG opinion and that a loaded firearm in a glove box that is not locked meets the Concealed weapon exclusion
and is permitted when the driver does not posses a valid permit.

Also to Mspaz the OAG's conclusion is clear that a person without a CWP can have the firearm withing reach while in the vehicle thus allowing
the driver to holster the firearm since it would be included in the Concealed exclusion because the firearm is properly secured in a container, the container being the holster.
In Memory - Master Trooper Junius A. Walker

Image
Concerns of Police Survivors (C.O.P.S.)
User avatar
Chasbo00
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 1819
Joined: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:34:29
Location: Northern VA

Re: OC question

Post by Chasbo00 »

VAStateLEO wrote: State Police Website still shows the OAG's Opinions as the official opinions.
http://www.vsp.state.va.us/Firearms_Transporting.shtm
The court case only addresses that secured does not mean locked. This was only one of three questions that the AG's opinion addressed, so his opinion is still current and relevant. But, it's just an opinion. The court case is a president and therefore has real legal clout.
Competition is one of the "great levelers" of ego.
User avatar
Chasbo00
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 1819
Joined: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 19:34:29
Location: Northern VA

Re: OC question

Post by Chasbo00 »

Make that precedent and not president in my prior post - need to fire that auto spell corrector of mine. :whistle:
Competition is one of the "great levelers" of ego.
User avatar
2k05gt
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 176
Joined: Sun, 13 May 2012 21:04:58
Location: Northern VA

Re: OC question

Post by 2k05gt »

ProShooter wrote:First, welcome.....
VAStateLEO wrote:
The short answer is that the law is written to prevent the firearm from becoming a projectile in an accident or fly out the window and a child picking it up later.
I'm quite certain that the GA did not have traffic crashes or wandering children in mind when they wrote 18.2-308.

VAStateLEO wrote:The Firearm must be secured while in the vehicle on a holster, glove box or other vessel / container.
Absolutely false. I can lay the gun on my seat and there is no violation of law.
VAStateLEO wrote:If stored in such a location the firearm must be unloaded.
Again, absolutely false. There is no statutory requirement for that.
I am a little confused, I have always been told that if you do not have a CC-permit that you must store the firearm and it must take 3 steps to obtain and or load the firearm. looking at VAcode.org http://vacode.org/18.2-308/#C10

The argument seams to be the Common observation language. in Mississippi they are debating this type of wording
http://blog.gulflive.com/mississippi-pr ... _weap.html

at open carry.org
http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/showt ... it)-STICKY

this question always comes back to
18.2-308 B 10.
Any person who may lawfully possess a firearm and is carrying a handgun while in a personal, private motor vehicle or vessel and such handgun is secured in a container or compartment in the vehicle or vessel. http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp...0+cod+18.2-308

Everywhere I search it always says "secured in a container or compartment in the vehicle" this tells me that it can not be readily accessible to the driver.
nothing in the Law states holstered. I believe this was intentional to stop Road Rage gun fights, allowing driver sto stop and think before grabbing the gun and shooting the A$$hole you cut you off and gave you the finger.

So it looks like to me the OpenCarry holster argument does not apply when in the car. the law clearly says "put it away"

but as you know opinions are like assholes... everybody has one :whistle:
"A gun is like a parachute, if you ever need one and don't have one, you'll never need one again"
Calling Illegal Aliens “Undocumented residents” is like calling a Drug Dealers “Unlicensed Pharmacists!”
User avatar
2k05gt
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 176
Joined: Sun, 13 May 2012 21:04:58
Location: Northern VA

Re: OC question

Post by 2k05gt »

I was pulled over a few months ago 59 in 45 (Mustang GT, Loud) and the cop pulled my firearm from the passenger seat and put it in his car,
it was in a pelican case but opened (not locked) while he ran my plates and license do you think he checked the serial numbers on my gun?
it's a lagit registered gun but still i think that's strange. he walked backed had me sign my ticket and asked me if I was going into the target store, I said yes. he then asked what I was going to do with the gun. I said that I lock the case and store it in my trunk.. he said "Good answer" handed me my gun in the case; closed btw. and wait for me to get out, put the gun in the trunk and walk into the store.
"A gun is like a parachute, if you ever need one and don't have one, you'll never need one again"
Calling Illegal Aliens “Undocumented residents” is like calling a Drug Dealers “Unlicensed Pharmacists!”
User avatar
SHMIV
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 5741
Joined: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:15:31
Location: Where ever I go, there I am.

Re: OC question

Post by SHMIV »

Where is user? He's a trusted legal source around here.

I wish that he'd chime in on this discussion.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
"Send lawyers, guns, and money; the $#!t has hit the fan!" - Warren Zevon
User avatar
2k05gt
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 176
Joined: Sun, 13 May 2012 21:04:58
Location: Northern VA

Re: OC question

Post by 2k05gt »

VAStateLEO wrote:
Chasbo00 wrote:There is now a VA Appeals Court case for this issue that supersedes the AG opinion. A member of this board was arrested and tried and found guilty of having a concealed handgun because he had a loaded handgun in his automobile's unlocked glove compartment. The conviction was overturned on appeal. The conviction reversal and dismissal in this case is completely consistent with the AG opinion.

http://www.courts.state.va.us/opinions/ ... 458122.pdf
After reading it I agree with the conclusion
custody,” Webster’s New Universal Unabridged Dictionary 1641 (2d ed. 1983), or
“well-fastened,” The American Heritage Dictionary 1173 (New College Ed. 1982).
The evidence here shows that appellant’s handgun was in a closed, latched and
“well-fastened” glove compartment. Pursuant to the statute, appellant’s gun was “secured in a . . .
compartment” in his vehicle, thus reducing his access to the weapon. Because appellant’s handgun
wasin compliance with the exception to the concealed weapon prohibition, his possession of the
gun did not violate Code § 18.2-308.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, we reverse and dismiss appellant’s conviction.
Reversed and dismissed.
So actually they agreed with the OAG opinion and that a loaded firearm in a glove box that is not locked meets the Concealed weapon exclusion
and is permitted when the driver does not posses a valid permit.

Also to Mspaz the OAG's conclusion is clear that a person without a CWP can have the firearm withing reach while in the vehicle thus allowing
the driver to holster the firearm since it would be included in the Concealed exclusion because the firearm is properly secured in a container, the container being the holster.

The more I read about the student who put his gun in the glove box, the more I believe that if you do not have a CC permit you can not have the gun on your hip, since it constitutes readily accessible. http://www.leagle.com/decision/In%20VACO%2020130205C70

The Supreme Court of Virginia, in Schaaf v. Commonwealth, 220 Va. 429, 258 S.E.2d 574 (1979), explained the rationale of the concealed weapon statute:

"The purpose of the statute was to interdict the practice of carrying a deadly weapon about the person, concealed, and yet so accessible as to afford prompt and immediate use. `About the person' must mean that it is so connected with the person as to be readily accessible for use or surprise if desired."

The evidence here shows that appellant's handgun was in a closed, latched and "well-fastened" glove compartment. Pursuant to the statute, appellant's gun was "secured in a... compartment" in his vehicle, thus reducing his access to the weapon. Because appellant's handgun was in compliance with the exception to the concealed weapon prohibition, his possession of the gun did not violate Code § 18.2-308.

Again the statement reducing access to the weapon (not readily accessible) a gun on my hip is readily accessible and not allowed in the vehicle unless you have a permit.

I cant get away from this wording, the statute is defining where you can store your gun (Closed in a container) not readily accessible (Like holstered on Hip) maybe I am reading it wrong this law sucks the way it's written it's so ambiguous that it is giving me a head ache, god why don't Virginia residents just get a CC permit and give Richmond the finger.
"A gun is like a parachute, if you ever need one and don't have one, you'll never need one again"
Calling Illegal Aliens “Undocumented residents” is like calling a Drug Dealers “Unlicensed Pharmacists!”
Post Reply

Return to “Carrying Your Firearm”