I know you are all as shocked as I am about this. I bet they didn't have a bomb making permit either.Less than a week after the push by Democrats push for more gun control went down in flames in the Senate, Reuters is reporting the suspected Boston Marathon bombers ignored gun laws that are already on the books in possessing the firearms they used in shootouts with the police.
According to Reuters, "The two brothers suspected in the Boston Marathon bombings, who police say engaged in a gun battle early Friday after a frenzied manhunt, were not licensed to own guns in the towns where they lived."
This means the handguns and "at least one rifle" the brothers had with them were acquired and possessed in ways that broke laws already in existence.
For example, to have acquired and possessed the firearms legally, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the elder brother, would have first needed "to apply for a gun license with the local police department where he lived in Cambridge, Massachusetts."
In Massachusetts, a Firearms Identification Card (FID) is required before buying, transporting, or possessing a firearm.
Another example of how new gun control laws will not deter criminals who have been ignoring the old laws for years.
Bombers didn't have permits for their guns
-
Stratojaxter
- Sharp Shooter

- Posts: 110
- Joined: Sat, 16 Mar 2013 17:37:50
Bombers didn't have permits for their guns
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government ... Their-Guns
- Greybeard
- Sharp Shooter

- Posts: 649
- Joined: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 19:53:09
- Location: SouthCentral PA for now - Northern Neck Forever
Re: Bombers didn't have permits for their guns
Uh oh. They're in trouble now.
Karl
Years ago it was suggested that, "An apple a day keeps the doctor away." But since all the doctors are now Muslim, I've found that a bacon sandwich works great!
Years ago it was suggested that, "An apple a day keeps the doctor away." But since all the doctors are now Muslim, I've found that a bacon sandwich works great!
- FiremanBob
- VGOF Bronze Supporter

- Posts: 2083
- Joined: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:50:05
Re: Bombers didn't have permits for their guns
This aspect of the story strengthens the terrorist cell theory. Having been an active participant in the Northeast Shooters forum, I can say with confidence that a legal Massachusetts resident would not have sold the firearms to either of the terrorists in a private transaction.
There is also the question of how they financed their lifestyles, being unemployed and not living with parents. My suspicion is AQ.
There is also the question of how they financed their lifestyles, being unemployed and not living with parents. My suspicion is AQ.
Author of The 10/22 Companion: How to Operate, Troubleshoot, Maintain and Improve Your Ruger 10/22
1022Companion.com
Project Appleseed Instructor
1022Companion.com
Project Appleseed Instructor
-
OakRidgeStars
- VGOF Gold Supporter

- Posts: 14108
- Joined: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:13:20
Re: Bombers didn't have permits for their guns
More like we are in trouble now. Don't you know that it's our fault these criminal dirtbags acquired their illegal guns illegally?Greybeard wrote:Uh oh. They're in trouble now.
Time to pass more gun laws.
Re: Bombers didn't have permits for their guns
FiremanBob wrote:
...There is also the question of how they financed their lifestyles, being unemployed and not living with parents. My suspicion is AQ.
How 'bout dem sowdys?
Now is the time for all good men to get off their rusty dustys...
Re: Bombers didn't have permits for their guns
I can't believe their guns haven't been linked to a gun show in Chantilly yet...oh wait...give the MSM time. 
Re: Bombers didn't have permits for their guns
Hmm, criminals breaking the law, hmm.
- 101stABdiv
- On Target

- Posts: 28
- Joined: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 20:42:11
- Location: Culpeper
Re: Bombers didn't have permits for their guns
Did they have a permit for the pressure cookers that they used to make the bombs with? The liberals will focus on the police officer that was killed with the gun but how about the 3 that died and over one hundred seriously injured by everyday items like a pressure cooker, nails and ball bearings?
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

Re: Bombers didn't have permits for their guns
Oh, they'll focus on that, too. At least, on where they got the stuff that made the other stuff go *boom*.101stABdiv wrote:Did they have a permit for the pressure cookers that they used to make the bombs with? The liberals will focus on the police officer that was killed with the gun but how about the 3 that died and over one hundred seriously injured by everyday items like a pressure cooker, nails and ball bearings?
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
- TacticalMom
- VGOF Bronze Supporter

- Posts: 806
- Joined: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:58:10
Re: Bombers didn't have permits for their guns
Wow there is a shocker... Glad that was cleared up. Criminals not listening to the laws. Well whoda thunk it?
"Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves."
Abraham Lincoln
Abraham Lincoln
Re: Bombers didn't have permits for their guns
just get ready for pressure cookers, ball bearings, nails, backpacks, and white and black hats to be banned next 


