Why Romney Lost

[FiremanBob]

Please don't feed the troll.

[WAustin]

Hairtrigger, while I suspect that lukertin is an Obamunist plant send here to disrupt VGOF, I will agree with his latest post in this thread. Your post is an ugly, racist comment that must be called out as wrong on VGOF or any other forum. I hope it does not reflect your actual opinion on the topic of liberty and justice for all.

There is a cause and effect relationship between Obamas skin color and his massive support amongst non-whites. Is that no less racist?

And illegal immigrants are being "pandered" to, previously just by the Dems, but now by the Republicans. This will have a negative effect on the nation.

Following you logic is there a cause and effect relationship with the white support for Mitt Romney? More specifically older white males?

Historically when dems nominated white candidates did blacks still vote approx the same percentile?

Historically did Hispanics vote more dem then republician?

Bush who as you would call it pandered to illegals still only get 40 percent of the Hispanic vote?

[Kreutz]

Wow....

These two posts exemplify why your candidate lost.

Damn, I had a hunch I sunk the chance of waking up to President Goode, this only confirmed it.

[Kreutz]

Following you logic is there a cause and effect relationship with the white support for Mitt Romney? More specifically older white males?

Maybe. Obama did better amongst old folks than people think, even crochecty old white men. Obama promised to keep the SS and medicare flowing....neither of which is sustainable incidentally.

That would be pandering as well.

Historically when dems nominated white candidates did blacks still vote approx the same percentile?

The Dems stopped being for white Americans in the mid 60's, way before my time. Its likely blacks would have been very much inclined to vote Republican then.

Historically did Hispanics vote more dem then republician?

Yes they have for at least the last 20 years, though I know TX and FL are exceptions.

Bush who as you would call it pandered to illegals still only get 40 percent of the Hispanic vote?

A quick Google search showed Romney pulled 27% of Latinos, so the 13% difference would at least imply pandering pays off.

[WAustin]

A quick Google search showed Romney pulled 27% of Latinos, so the 13% difference would at least imply pandering pays off.


Obama did nothing for Hispanics in reality but make more empty promises Why Republicans decided to talk about electric fences And self deportation so Hispanics hardly got pandered they just picked the lesser of two evils