"Serious" .223 ammunition?

Post Reply
User avatar
JamesCanby
Pot Shot
Pot Shot
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 06:07:21
Location: Alexandria, VA

"Serious" .223 ammunition?

Post by JamesCanby »

When I go to the range with my .40 handgun I use Winchester White Box, but when I carry I keep it loaded with Speer Gold Dots.

As a fairly new AR owner, I need advice on making that same decision for my .223 ammunition. I use inexpensive rounds from CTD or Classic Arms -- and they work just fine with no FTLs or FTEs. For serious use, however, I need some advice on what to keep in the magazines when I'm not at the range.

I see quite a few available variants, and would like to know what you suggest. Price is not as important as effectiveness. When the SHTF, I need to be confident in the stopping power of my ammunition.
User avatar
jdonovan
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 1961
Joined: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:03:02

Re: "Serious" .223 ammunition?

Post by jdonovan »

I tend to buy SS109/M855 in bulk, and use it for practice, and use it for the when things get worse plans.

Also te 62 grain projectile will have differeing POI vs. the cheaper 55gr, so I like to work out my sight calibrations, drift etc... with what I'll really use.
User avatar
JamesCanby
Pot Shot
Pot Shot
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 06:07:21
Location: Alexandria, VA

Re: "Serious" .223 ammunition?

Post by JamesCanby »

jdonovan wrote:I tend to buy SS109/M855 in bulk, and use it for practice, and use it for the when things get worse plans.

Also the 62 grain projectile will have differeing POI vs. the cheaper 55gr, so I like to work out my sight calibrations, drift etc... with what I'll really use.
Thanks for the reply. I'll check out those rounds...
User avatar
rromeo
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 306
Joined: Sun, 09 May 2010 20:54:59
Location: Radford

Re: "Serious" .223 ammunition?

Post by rromeo »

Hornady TAP 75 grain.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
Never initiate force against another. But should someone do violence to you, retaliate without hesitation, without reservation, without quarter, until you are sure that he will never wish to harm - or never be capable of harming - you or yours again.KYFHO
User avatar
jdonovan
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 1961
Joined: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:03:02

Re: "Serious" .223 ammunition?

Post by jdonovan »

rromeo wrote:Hornady TAP 75 grain.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
Only a good choice if you have a faster twist barrel.
User avatar
gunderwood
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 7189
Joined: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:28:34

Re: "Serious" .223 ammunition?

Post by gunderwood »

jdonovan wrote:
rromeo wrote:Hornady TAP 75 grain.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
Only a good choice if you have a faster twist barrel.
Or for home defense. Some 1:9s will shoot them fine past 100 yards, some won't.

My choices are:

Short range home defense (fragment like crazy): Hornady 75gr TAP (the NATO 5.56mm is superior to the .223, but good luck finding any)
General SHTF, bulk, etc. : M855
Specialty: M318 (www.kmike.com/Ammo/tm%2043-0001-27.pdf)

Despite the cost, the M318 had really good reports from the wars. It's hard to tell, but most claimed it was superior to the M855.
sudo modprobe commonsense
FATAL: Module commonsense not found.
User avatar
Jakeiscrazy
VGOF Silver Supporter
VGOF Silver Supporter
Posts: 3519
Joined: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:06:02
Location: Chesterfield, VA

Re: "Serious" .223 ammunition?

Post by Jakeiscrazy »

Here is a good page of .223 self defense round http://ammo.ar15.com/project/Self_Defen ... x.htm#.223
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.”
-Winston Churchill
User avatar
gunderwood
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 7189
Joined: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:28:34

Re: "Serious" .223 ammunition?

Post by gunderwood »

Jakeiscrazy wrote:Here is a good page of .223 self defense round http://ammo.ar15.com/project/Self_Defen ... x.htm#.223
That's a good link.
sudo modprobe commonsense
FATAL: Module commonsense not found.
User avatar
jdonovan
VGOF Gold Supporter
VGOF Gold Supporter
Posts: 1961
Joined: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:03:02

Re: "Serious" .223 ammunition?

Post by jdonovan »

gunderwood wrote:
Jakeiscrazy wrote:Here is a good page of .223 self defense round http://ammo.ar15.com/project/Self_Defen ... x.htm#.223
That's a good link.
and keeps reminding me why I REALLY prefer .308 over 223
User avatar
JamesCanby
Pot Shot
Pot Shot
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 06:07:21
Location: Alexandria, VA

Re: "Serious" .223 ammunition?

Post by JamesCanby »

Thanks, guys ... all good advice and a great website link. I appreciate your responses.
User avatar
M1A4ME
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 806
Joined: Sat, 01 May 2010 08:27:56

Re: "Serious" .223 ammunition?

Post by M1A4ME »

I have a few .223's of various makes/types. It is an excellent varmint round. Can it do more? Yes, but that's true of any cartridge.

Having said this, I figure if I have to use a .223 to defend myself with the situation warrants shooting till the threat is no longer a threat. That's what you'd do with a small caliber handgun so why would a small caliber rifle be any different. Why else did you by the 20 or 30 round magazines.
User avatar
jrswanson1
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 752
Joined: Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:23:03
Location: Woodbridge

Re: "Serious" .223 ammunition?

Post by jrswanson1 »

jdonovan wrote:
gunderwood wrote:
Jakeiscrazy wrote:Here is a good page of .223 self defense round http://ammo.ar15.com/project/Self_Defen ... x.htm#.223
That's a good link.
and keeps reminding me why I REALLY prefer .308 over 223
And if you scroll down, you'll see why I chose the 6.8 SPC as my SHTF cartridge. I have a 5.56 AR and a 7.62 NATO MBR. The MBR packs a punch, but it's HEAVY. I can get a 6.8 SPC in an M4 size carbine and have better barrier penetration versus a 5.56 without the weight penalty of the 7.62 NATO and the lack of accuracy of the 7.62x39 cartridge/rifle combo.

Jim
User avatar
Rumson
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 166
Joined: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 02:29:46
Location: Loudoun County

Re: "Serious" .223 ammunition?

Post by Rumson »

You might want to research what you have (twist, barrel length, is it built for 5.56 NATO pressure or just .223) and what you intend to do with it.

Read this and then reassess what you want to accomplish. Buy accordingly.

http://anarchangel.blogspot.com/2007/01 ... ology.html
User avatar
gunderwood
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 7189
Joined: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:28:34

Re: "Serious" .223 ammunition?

Post by gunderwood »

jrswanson1 wrote:And if you scroll down, you'll see why I chose the 6.8 SPC as my SHTF cartridge. I have a 5.56 AR and a 7.62 NATO MBR. The MBR packs a punch, but it's HEAVY. I can get a 6.8 SPC in an M4 size carbine and have better barrier penetration versus a 5.56 without the weight penalty of the 7.62 NATO and the lack of accuracy of the 7.62x39 cartridge/rifle combo.

Jim
The downside being that replenishing your stock of 6.8SPC will always be harder than 5.56/7.62. If there was only one best and it required no compromises we'd all use that and have nothing to argue over in the forums. The Internet tubes would be a dull place!
sudo modprobe commonsense
FATAL: Module commonsense not found.
User avatar
Jakeiscrazy
VGOF Silver Supporter
VGOF Silver Supporter
Posts: 3519
Joined: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 10:06:02
Location: Chesterfield, VA

Re: "Serious" .223 ammunition?

Post by Jakeiscrazy »

gunderwood wrote:
jrswanson1 wrote:And if you scroll down, you'll see why I chose the 6.8 SPC as my SHTF cartridge. I have a 5.56 AR and a 7.62 NATO MBR. The MBR packs a punch, but it's HEAVY. I can get a 6.8 SPC in an M4 size carbine and have better barrier penetration versus a 5.56 without the weight penalty of the 7.62 NATO and the lack of accuracy of the 7.62x39 cartridge/rifle combo.

Jim
The downside being that replenishing your stock of 6.8SPC will always be harder than 5.56/7.62. If there was only one best and it required no compromises we'd all use that and have nothing to argue over in the forums. The Internet tubes would be a dull place!
Interesting that you should bring that up. I personally doubt any ammo of any kind will be found if the SHTF. My guess is your gonna be stuck with what you have on hand or what you can reload.
“Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.”
-Winston Churchill
User avatar
gunderwood
VGOF Platinum Supporter
VGOF Platinum Supporter
Posts: 7189
Joined: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:28:34

Re: "Serious" .223 ammunition?

Post by gunderwood »

Jakeiscrazy wrote:
gunderwood wrote:
jrswanson1 wrote:And if you scroll down, you'll see why I chose the 6.8 SPC as my SHTF cartridge. I have a 5.56 AR and a 7.62 NATO MBR. The MBR packs a punch, but it's HEAVY. I can get a 6.8 SPC in an M4 size carbine and have better barrier penetration versus a 5.56 without the weight penalty of the 7.62 NATO and the lack of accuracy of the 7.62x39 cartridge/rifle combo.

Jim
The downside being that replenishing your stock of 6.8SPC will always be harder than 5.56/7.62. If there was only one best and it required no compromises we'd all use that and have nothing to argue over in the forums. The Internet tubes would be a dull place!
Interesting that you should bring that up. I personally doubt any ammo of any kind will be found if the SHTF. My guess is your gonna be stuck with what you have on hand or what you can reload.
So as soon as the SHTF everyone fires off every round they have stockpiled and there is no more to be had? No, there will be plenty of ammo around, but it just won't be at your local Walmart.
sudo modprobe commonsense
FATAL: Module commonsense not found.
CCFan
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 844
Joined: Fri, 08 May 2009 21:51:35

Re: "Serious" .223 ammunition?

Post by CCFan »

gunderwood wrote:
My choices are:

Short range home defense (fragment like crazy): Hornady 75gr TAP (the NATO 5.56mm is superior to the .223, but good luck finding any)
General SHTF, bulk, etc. : M855
Specialty: M318 (http://www.kmike.com/Ammo/tm%2043-0001-27.pdf)

Despite the cost, the M318 had really good reports from the wars. It's hard to tell, but most claimed it was superior to the M855.
:thumbsup: on the M855 for SHTF

Is M318 the compressed core stuff? Mk318? I read through the article in the link, but I didn't see any designations in that article for any specialty *318 designated ammo... did I miss something?
Jakeiscrazy wrote:Interesting that you should bring that up. I personally doubt any ammo of any kind will be found if the SHTF. My guess is your gonna be stuck with what you have on hand or what you can reload.
Ah, I'm good to go as long as Google Maps doesn't divulge all my ammo stashes I have geot-tagged. :whistle: Oh, and as long as I can access Google maps. Maybe I'll invest in that standalone GPS and some notebook paper... Better yet - maybe I need to give up the technology all together and start drawing my treasure map.....
Si vis pacem, para bellum.
Resistance to Tyranny is Obedience to God.
User avatar
doubletap62
Sighting In
Sighting In
Posts: 11
Joined: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 21:36:52

Re: "Serious" .223 ammunition?

Post by doubletap62 »

I used the Hornady 55gr ZOMBIE ammo on hogs last week in Texas. They were devistating when the hog was shot in the head. No body shots taken out there, only head shots. It is the same as the V-Max ammo, only with a ZOMBIE Green tip! Great round though!! Neil Davies from Hornady is a good friend of mine and he swears by their GMX.. just saying.
User avatar
OSU84
Sighting In
Sighting In
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun, 02 Aug 2009 23:12:41

Re: "Serious" .223 ammunition?

Post by OSU84 »

Hornaday TAP ammo for defense rounds!!
Post Reply

Return to “Ammunition and Reloading”