Page 1 of 1
Speed Loader for Sig P239
Posted: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:16:49
by CrackerKorean
I have been looking for a speed loader for the wife and her sig. I have seen a few gun specific speed loaders but not one for the P239.
Any suggestions for a magazine speed loader? I did find an HKS that said it would work with the P239 as well as other guns but wasn't sure about more universal loaders.
Any help is appreciated.
Re: Speed Loader for Sig P239
Posted: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 07:52:39
by OakRidgeStars
UpLula speed loader. Ain't nuttin' better
http://www.maglula.com/
Re: Speed Loader for Sig P239
Posted: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 08:56:09
by jdonovan
+1 million to the UpLula
Re: Speed Loader for Sig P239
Posted: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:08:44
by allingeneral
Re: Speed Loader for Sig P239
Posted: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:15:16
by jdonovan
I'm a bit more partial to the Stripula.
http://www.butler-creek.com/products/st ... oader.html
it even works well with ammo not on strippers.
Re: Speed Loader for Sig P239
Posted: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 22:18:46
by CrackerKorean
Awesome guys, Thanks a bunch!!
Re: Speed Loader for Sig P239
Posted: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:23:35
by Diomed
Supposedly there's now a baby Lula, for single stack mags, which I think the P239 is? The regular upLula is kind of wobbly on single stacks.
Re: Speed Loader for Sig P239
Posted: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 02:21:04
by Jakeiscrazy
Diomed wrote:Supposedly there's now a baby Lula, for single stack mags, which I think the P239 is? The regular upLula is kind of wobbly on single stacks.
Yep
http://www.shootersvault.net/baby-lula- ... 18291.html but it says nothing smaller than .380.
Re: Speed Loader for Sig P239
Posted: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 07:31:17
by allingeneral
I heard you can get the Baby Lula cheaper at AIG Tactical
http://all-in-general.com/product_info. ... s_id=62079
Re: Speed Loader for Sig P239
Posted: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 00:03:31
by Diomed
Interesting, as the blurb I read said it was not for anything larger than .380.
Re: Speed Loader for Sig P239
Posted: Sat, 30 Jul 2011 16:23:00
by Jakeiscrazy
Diomed wrote:
Interesting, as the blurb I read said it was not for anything larger than .380.
Opps typo! I meant says nothing **larger** than .380
