Page 1 of 1
S&W polymer revolver
Posted: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:42:02
by newdovo
When the Ruger LCR came out, I knew it was just a matter of time before other gun manufacturers would jump on the polymer revolver band wagon if it seemed like it was catching on. Smith & Wesson will have one coming out. I saw it mentioned in a recent American Rifleman, and went looking for info. When I read the mention, I noted that it is .38+p and the weight is 14.3 ounces. My aluminum framed j-frame is .38+p and weighs in at 15 ounces. So my initial reaction is ...why? It does have laser sights already attached and has a pinned front sight. Also a weird ambidexterous cylinder release on top.
When Ruger came out with the LCR, it was their first light weight revolver. It was a risky venture to go with a polymer model, but it has seemingly been a success for their entry into the lightweight revolver market. Smith & Wesson, on the other hand, has many different flavors of lightweight revolvers. So I don't quite get it.
Thoughts?

- new smith.jpg (74.55 KiB) Viewed 6557 times
Parry
Re: S&W polymer revolver
Posted: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:46:58
by OakRidgeStars
I hate the grip on it, and I haven't even held one yet.
Re: S&W polymer revolver
Posted: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:36:22
by fiasconva
Even though I'm a Smith fan I think I'll pass. IF I'm gonna carry a small concealable revolver it's going to be a j-frame.
Re: S&W polymer revolver
Posted: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:18:24
by DWinter
I looked at it too, and like has been said already, I'm a S&W fan also. I'd have to hold it to be sure. The Lord blessed me with fairly big hands and having held some of these small pocket weapons, I just don't know if I can get a good, consistant grip to be accurate. I know I can almost put my index finger over the barrel end of a Kel-tech P3AT and correct me if I'm wrong, I just see that as a bad thing

Re: S&W polymer revolver
Posted: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 00:48:22
by Diomed
Re: S&W polymer revolver
Posted: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 04:46:33
by zephyp
Definitely not a fan of shaved hammer revolvers...no SA...yes, I know thats not a big factor with a carry revolver but still dont care for it...
Re: S&W polymer revolver
Posted: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 07:59:38
by guitarpicva
zephyp wrote:Definitely not a fan of shaved hammer revolvers...no SA...yes, I know thats not a big factor with a carry revolver but still dont care for it...
Only if I want to hit something more than once and not by accident!

Re: S&W polymer revolver
Posted: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 20:40:46
by zephyp
guitarpicva wrote:zephyp wrote:Definitely not a fan of shaved hammer revolvers...no SA...yes, I know thats not a big factor with a carry revolver but still dont care for it...
Only if I want to hit something more than once and not by accident!

Yeah. If your slow enough on an DA only revolver it can shoot almost as good as SA but in a stress situation you aint got the time. To confess, about the only time I would use SA in a defensive situation is so the BG could hear the nice loud CLICK!!!!
Seriously, if your gonna carry a revolver you might have time to go to SA but I wouldnt bet on it...
Re: S&W polymer revolver
Posted: Sun, 25 Apr 2010 02:29:35
by rkbanet
I prefer a hammerless revolver as a defensive gun since it allows for a higher grip. As far as the original poster ? IMHO a 8-9 lb trigger pull on a da SA or revolver for that matter is about average.
Re: S&W polymer revolver
Posted: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 18:01:08
by DaveJames
I like the slick hump backs, but need to see one , the top strap cylinder release is interesting being left handed, but I love "J" frames
Re: S&W polymer revolver
Posted: Fri, 07 May 2010 20:22:08
by xjohnx
S&W also released a 380 semi alongside this new revolver, the Bodyguard 380. Any thoughts on this little guy?

Re: S&W polymer revolver
Posted: Mon, 10 May 2010 00:36:05
by Diomed
xjohnx wrote:Any thoughts on this little guy?
Have any actually made it out into the marketplace yet?
For that matter, have their revolvers?
Re: S&W polymer revolver
Posted: Mon, 10 May 2010 08:48:20
by xjohnx
i believe they were due the first of this month.