Page 1 of 1
High Court Rejects Challenge to NRA's Signature Law
Posted: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 05:36:15
by ksanftleben
"In 2005, the National Rifle Association of America enacted a law that probably saved the American gun-making industry from bankruptcy. And just this last week, the Supreme Court rejected a constitutional challenge to this landmark legislation, ensuring this law stays on the books to preserve America’s culture of lawful firearm ownership."
Entire article here:
High Court Rejects Challenge to NRA’s Signature Law
R/Kurt
Re: High Court Rejects Challenge to NRA’s Signature Law
Posted: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 08:48:25
by zephyp
Great article Kurt. My dear sweet Young supported the NRA by upgrading my membership to lifer status as a Christmas gift. It doesnt get much better than that.
Re: High Court Rejects Challenge to NRA’s Signature Law
Posted: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:39:19
by VBshooter
We can all be glad that calmer heads prevailed on this,,, To see Bloombergs name in there was no surprise,, He in himself is a major hurdle to get over ,, Having shown that he will lie, gather false information through entrapment and other means,, and lastly use his own fortune to buy what he wants .. Just look at his last election<<<
Re: High Court Rejects Challenge to NRA’s Signature Law
Posted: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:09:13
by zephyp
VBshooter wrote:We can all be glad that calmer heads prevailed on this,,, To see Bloombergs name in there was no surprise,, He in himself is a major hurdle to get over ,, Having shown that he will lie, gather false information through entrapment and other means,, and lastly use his own fortune to buy what he wants .. Just look at his last election<<<
Yeah, but he spent around $250M and won by a small margin. That's telling.