http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/ass ... es-n724106
Following this logic, AR style firearms, shotguns and semi-auto pistols shouldn't be protected either."Put simply, we have no power to extend Second Amendment protections to weapons of war," Judge Robert King wrote for the court
Doesn't this ruling contradict the SCOTUS ruling in Caetano V Massachussetts? Didn't SCOTUS essentially rule that if it's bearable, it's protected by 2A? Or did I miss something?Judge William Traxler issued a dissent. By concluding the Second Amendment doesn't even apply, Traxler wrote, the majority "has gone to greater lengths than any other court to eviscerate the constitutionally guaranteed right to keep and bear arms." He also wrote that the court did not apply a strict enough review on the constitutionality of the law.
"For a law-abiding citizen who, for whatever reason, chooses to protect his home with a semi-automatic rifle instead of a semi-automatic handgun, Maryland's law clearly imposes a significant burden on the exercise of the right to arm oneself at home, and it should at least be subject to strict scrutiny review before it is allowed to stand," Traxler wrote.