Page 1 of 1

3 Different guns, or are they?

Posted: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 09:14:48
by AlanM
Nice example with visuals of some similar shotguns.

http://weaponsman.com/?p=37563
Image
the three guns are, from top to bottom:

1. A gun that was once made with a shoulder stock and longer barrels. It is a “Short Barreled Shotgun” that has a $200 transfer tax, and takes most of a year (at the speed of bureaucracy) for the transfer paperwork.
2. A gun that was made from the beginning in the pistol form factor. It is “Any Other Weapon” under the NFA. It has a $5 transfer tax, and takes most of a year (at the speed of bureaucracy) for the transfer paperwork.
3. A gun that has some vestige or simulacrum of rifling in the barrel… this is a pistol under the law, and a Title 1 firearm that does not fall under the NFA at all. It can be sold over counter at any FFL, and the buyer can walk out with it, except in states like California where one of the “sickeners” that politicians and criminals impose on lawful owners is a waiting period.

Len asks if this makes any sense. Of course it doesn’t make any sense, it’s the law.

Re: 3 Different guns, or are they?

Posted: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 11:55:04
by Reverenddel
Well done! It shows the idiocy behind the firearms laws in this country, and that they were created by people who DO NOT FREAKING SHOOT!

Re: 3 Different guns, or are they?

Posted: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 13:03:53
by MarcSpaz
Probably the best example I have seen so far. The only issues that I have with this line of defense of our rights is, every lefty responds with "That's why no guns should be legal." The debate is either wasted on them or blows up in our face because they don't care about our rights.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image