Page 1 of 1

OathKeepers AAR

Posted: Sun, 05 Feb 2017 11:18:39
by Monkey
Interesting read on OK's infiltration of SJW networks:

Link Here

Re: OathKeepers AAR

Posted: Sun, 05 Feb 2017 15:21:14
by Reverenddel
It was silly to publish it though.

Rule one of Intelligence. Never reveal your techniques, or your sources.

Rule two of Intelligence. Never trust what you hear, as it could be disinformation.

Rule three of Intelligence. If the information is confirmed true, realize that using it may reveal your source/ yourself.

Re: OathKeepers AAR

Posted: Sun, 05 Feb 2017 15:23:43
by WRW
Sounds harsh, but that's how it works.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image

Re: OathKeepers AAR

Posted: Sun, 05 Feb 2017 20:49:47
by kelu
While what you said it's true, it's a good read to understand who the "enemy" is.

Re: OathKeepers AAR

Posted: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 22:04:52
by MarcSpaz
After spending a couple of hours reviewing some inside video of these events, it is amazing what flat out liars these protestors are and I am truly shock that an armed citizen has not laid waste to some of these animals.

How the hell can dozens of people attack a man, breaking someones face, for the crime of "looking like a trump supporter" and shoulder-check the cops trying to provoke a response of force from the police, and then say your are engaged in a peaceful protest against the intolerant Nazi haters?

I am really starting to get massively disgusted with these Libtards.

Re: OathKeepers AAR

Posted: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 23:56:04
by SHMIV
These are not protesters. They are not even rioters. These are guerrilla armies, and they are participating in planned and coordinated attacks.

This needs to be recognized, and dealt with accordingly. It seems that Oath Keepers has picked up on this, but it also seems that locations are selected in places where armed resistance is unlikely, and local authorities will be disinclined to confront them, and are likely to actually encourage the attacking forces.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image

Re: OathKeepers AAR

Posted: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:09:08
by Swampman
This just reinforces the need to carry on a daily basis.

Re: OathKeepers AAR

Posted: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:31:25
by SHMIV
I wish that I could carry on a daily basis. Unfortunately, I frequently end up in places where that is illegal. It's also against company policy.

Of course, if a national reciprocity law is passed... well, screw company policy. It's getting too dangerous to be a white, heterosexual, Christian, Trump-voting man in a lot of these urban areas.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image

Re: OathKeepers AAR

Posted: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:39:36
by SHMIV
Seems I'm not the only one saying that we are not dealing with rioters. I called them "guerilla armies", and this guy calls them "terrorists":


http://m.townhall.com/columnists/jackke ... s-n2282113

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image

Re: OathKeepers AAR

Posted: Wed, 08 Feb 2017 11:34:47
by Swampman
In truth, they are.