Page 1 of 1

Katie Couric Responds to Deceptive Editing Charges

Posted: Fri, 27 May 2016 02:48:06
by ShotgunBlast

Re: Katie Couric Responds to Deceptive Editing Charges

Posted: Fri, 27 May 2016 06:39:01
by Reverenddel
You know? Leslie Stahl came to a gun show I was working about 2012...

Feel the same way about her, as I do Couric.

"You can speak, but your actions show your true nature."

Re: Katie Couric Responds to Deceptive Editing Charges

Posted: Fri, 27 May 2016 08:39:37
by wittmeba
Katie and Hillary must have gone to the same schools!


I recall this message "You can speak, but your actions show your true nature." as:
Your actions speak so loudly, I cannot hear what you are saying

Re: Katie Couric Responds to Deceptive Editing Charges

Posted: Fri, 27 May 2016 11:28:10
by wittmeba

Re: Katie Couric Responds to Deceptive Editing Charges

Posted: Fri, 27 May 2016 12:20:03
by Reverenddel
And this is why I still say CNN is liberal as shiznit

Re: Katie Couric Responds to Deceptive Editing Charges

Posted: Fri, 27 May 2016 17:14:36
by BlackKnight
Katie Couric went to UVA. Having done private security in the UVA area of Charlottesville her lying like this does not surprise me at all. I have met very few UVA students or grads that could tell the truth if their lives depended on it.

Re: Katie Couric Responds to Deceptive Editing Charges

Posted: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 09:39:38
by wittmeba
VCDL alert posting.

https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/ ... 8EF10038B/



Here is the 8 seconds that was edited out of Katie Couric's video for those who may not want to view the video:

===
Transcript with VCDL Response:

KATIE: If there are no background checks, how do you prevent ... I know how you all are going to answer this, but I'm asking anyway. If there are no background checks for gun purchasers, how do you prevent felons or terrorists from walking into, say a licensed gun dealer and purchasing a gun?

MALE: Well, one, if you're not in jail then you should still have your basic rights and you should go buy a gun.

KATIE: So, if you're a terrorist or a felon …

MALE: If you're a felon and you've done your time, you should have your rights.

MALE: The fact is we do have statutes, both at the federal and state level that prohibit classes of people from being in possession of firearms. If you're under 18 in Virginia you can't walk around with a gun. If you're an illegal immigrant, if you're a convicted felon, if you've been adjudicated in same, these things are already illegal. So, what we're really asking about is a question of prior restraint. How can we prevent future crime by identifying bad guys before they do anything bad? And, the simple answer is you can't.

And, particularly, under the legal system we have in the United States there are a lot of Supreme Court opinions that say, "No, prior restraint is something that the government does not have the authority to do." Until there is an overt act that allows us to say, "That's a bad guy," then you can't punish him.

FEMALE: I would take another outlook on this. First, I'll ask you what crime or what law has ever stopped a crime? Tell me one law that has ever stopped a crime from happening.
===

Here, again is the audio of the FULL response that Katie simply will not acknowledge:

https://soundcloud.com/washington-free- ... dl-members

or

http://tinyurl.com/jgrbryu