Question on TMac's EO # 50
Posted: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:27:12
"On October 15, Governor Terry McAuliffe (D) signed executive order number 50 banning the open carry of firearms in state buildings used by the Virginia executive branch ...."
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... ium=social
..........................................................................
Interersting.
First, if this contravenes existing statues, then it's void anyway, I would think. Then there's that wrinkle about the difference between rules and policies (that came up when some state institutions attempted to ban firearms from their premises - I forget exactly which was what), and I guess also whether a gubernatorial EO constitutes the same as a policy (or whatever the terminology is)
Second, even if TMac can do what he purports to have done, the next question is its scope. The phrase "in state buildings used by the Virginia executive branch" is probably intentionally ambiguously broad, I'd guess. Might be interpreted to mean any building used (as in by just walking through, TMac would argue) by members of the Va. executive branch. Effective by its terms, I'd argue (if at all), just in buildings dedicated to the use of the executive branch. I'd hazard a guess that means open carry is not effected at the GA building and therefore won't interfere with activities on VCDL's legislative day. (although that call obviously must be made by the VCDL itself) But what about walking across the capitol grounds on the way to the GA building? Will some folks be intimidated or confused (or even intentionally misinformed) and therefore not exercise their Second Amendment rights?
I've been out of town, but I haven't seen a statement from VCDL on this yet. Did I just miss it?
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government ... ium=social
..........................................................................
Interersting.
First, if this contravenes existing statues, then it's void anyway, I would think. Then there's that wrinkle about the difference between rules and policies (that came up when some state institutions attempted to ban firearms from their premises - I forget exactly which was what), and I guess also whether a gubernatorial EO constitutes the same as a policy (or whatever the terminology is)
Second, even if TMac can do what he purports to have done, the next question is its scope. The phrase "in state buildings used by the Virginia executive branch" is probably intentionally ambiguously broad, I'd guess. Might be interpreted to mean any building used (as in by just walking through, TMac would argue) by members of the Va. executive branch. Effective by its terms, I'd argue (if at all), just in buildings dedicated to the use of the executive branch. I'd hazard a guess that means open carry is not effected at the GA building and therefore won't interfere with activities on VCDL's legislative day. (although that call obviously must be made by the VCDL itself) But what about walking across the capitol grounds on the way to the GA building? Will some folks be intimidated or confused (or even intentionally misinformed) and therefore not exercise their Second Amendment rights?
I've been out of town, but I haven't seen a statement from VCDL on this yet. Did I just miss it?
