Virginia Gun Owners Forum - VGOF

Officially labelled domestic terrorism.

Here comes STAGE TWO - assault on the Second Amendment.

Bank on it.

As I said...it wasn't going to end with the Confederate flag...

The mayor said, and I quote: "We are treating this investigation as an act of domestic terrorism".

Then the FBI spokesman backpedals from that...saying "it's not been labelled anything" yet". Looks like they forgot to tell the mayor of Chattanooga not to reveal anything yet. Regardless we know where this is going...

Yep , We don't have to have "Crystal Balls" to see the future anymore !

Methinks they should start by taking away the *()$#)@(*#$ "No Guns" signs....

CCFan wrote:Methinks they should start by taking away the *()$#)@(*#$ "No Guns" signs....

Yes, those signs are a self fulfilling tool...they create the venue for these events and then the "cause" for gun control.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

It's a jihad, but not a libtard anti-2A jihad. The perp's name is Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez. So much for all the fancy anti-4A "counterterrorism" technology the .gov is using to surveil Tea Party members and Oathkeepers.

Some reports that need to be vetted. Not sure about the site and its rep. Looks like it is being reported as an ISIS attack.

http://heavy.com/news/2015/07/muhammad- ... r-age-bio/

@ FiremanBob: I agree, but it will become a part of the ant-2A arsenal and the bases are posted.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

FiremanBob wrote:It's a jihad, but not a libtard anti-2A jihad. The perp's name is Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez. So much for all the fancy anti-4A "counterterrorism" technology the .gov is using to surveil Tea Party members and Oathkeepers.

Oh, but remember, we took away some of those tools. If you're the tinfoil hat wearing type, you might wonder whether or not they're going to claim they could have caught this guy had they only had full access like they want.

If it were a white guy, preferably a vet or OathKeeper, it would be domestic terrorism.
If It's a muslim, it's not. They are sensitive persons, not to be offended.

And of course the marines should be disarmed and the locations to be gun-free zones. You can't trust them with weapons.

DaRoller wrote:

FiremanBob wrote:It's a jihad, but not a libtard anti-2A jihad. The perp's name is Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez. So much for all the fancy anti-4A "counterterrorism" technology the .gov is using to surveil Tea Party members and Oathkeepers.

Oh, but remember, we took away some of those tools. If you're the tinfoil hat wearing type, you might wonder whether or not they're going to claim they could have caught this guy had they only had full access like they want.

They still have ALL access they want. It was extended for 6 months.

That worked well...

This is so Sad...I'm tired of innocent Americans being Murdered !

They're never gonna profile the rag-head, camel-humpin' bastards until they have all OUR guns. Then they'll worry about takin' their guns.

An opinion piece on the subject :



http://www.vdare.com/articles/down-the- ... ssimilated:

The author suggests, correctly, that the Armed Forces might be more effective if they were armed.

Also, if we are banning Confederate flags over Dylan Roof, can we ban Mosques over Jihad hungry Muslims? The Muslims seem to be doing far more damage than white supremacy nuts.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

Ron71 wrote:

That worked well...

It becomes apparent that they need a "No Bullets" sign to stop the bullets too. What were they thinking! [\sarcasm]

As usual, SHMIV hits the bullseye. I'd like to see all the libs who protest the flag campaign to ban mosques in America.

The liberal loonies are already blaming the NRA and 'gun nuts'. These people are truly deranged.

I'm sick of this story already. Shouldn't our Marines , that are part of our armed forces be "ARMED". Is our Gov't that stupid that in this day and age , that these men and women should have to be in such a dangerous situation ! Our Military uniforms today may as well have a Target on the back !Should our Military have to call 911 for the Police to defend them ?

These "Gun Free Zone" signs are just begging for a problem. These Thugs know that they have the perfect opportunity just laid out in front of them and our Gov't will do nothing to change it.

Yesterday I had lunch with a buddy in Enon. While there I counted 2 men OCing , 3 Chesterfield Officers and 2 other people I know that were "Armed". My buddy and myself were CCing. That's 9 in about 45 minutes....I have never felt so SAFE !!!

Snakester wrote:I'm sick of this story already. Shouldn't our Marines , that are part of our armed forces be "ARMED". Is our Gov't that stupid that in this day and age , that these men and women should have to be in such a dangerous situation ! Our Military uniforms today may as well have a Target on the back !Should our Military have to call 911 for the Police to defend them ?

This is crazy! Our Government provides our military personnel with weapons to go to other countries to fight and protect those citizens. Our military does NOT allow the same persons to have guns to protect our own citizens.