Virginia Gun Owners Forum - VGOF

By running on one simple platform. If she plays it right, no way she can lose.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/03/ ... F520150305

I saw Hillary telling a womens' group, "Does anybody here think it would be a really good thing to have a WOMAN as POTUS?

And I thought to myself, "Yeah, a lot of people though it would be great to have a person of color as POTUS, and elected Barack Obama for that reason. Look what a clusterf*ck THAT turned out to be.

dorminWS wrote:I saw Hillary telling a womens' group, "Does anybody here think it would be a really good thing to have a WOMAN as POTUS?

And I thought to myself, "Yeah, a lot of people though it would be great to have a person of color as POTUS, and elected Barack Obama for that reason. Look what a clusterf*ck THAT turned out to be.

And those same people will march over the cliff again with a smile on their face.

Every time I see that quoted on FoxNews I respond with "Sure I wouldn't mind seeing a female president. Just NOT you!!!"

dorminWS wrote:I saw Hillary telling a womens' group, "Does anybody here think it would be a really good thing to have a WOMAN as POTUS?

And I thought to myself, "Yeah, a lot of people though it would be great to have a person of color as POTUS, and elected Barack Obama for that reason. Look what a clusterf*ck THAT turned out to be.

At least this time around she's going to run as a woman.

How is she going to talk her self out of the fact that her husband's female staff, as well as her own staff as a Senator and head of the State Department, all had a much larger pay gap between them and men, when compared to the private market?

Someone has to call her out as a liar. When she had a chance to correct it in the past, she didn't. Why would we believe the future would be any different?

If we have a candidate with guts....she is beatable. If the candidate refuses to fight like Romney and McCain did......well what can you do.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

MarcSpaz wrote:How is she going to talk her self out of the fact that her husband's female staff, as well as her own staff as a Senator and head of the State Department, all had a much larger pay gap between them and men, when compared to the private market?

Someone has to call her out as a liar. When she had a chance to correct it in the past, she didn't. Why would we believe the future would be any different?

How can she run on pay equality when she is no better than anyone else.
What a joke. People will believe anything they.

Pffft. White house is clearing a path for the wookie to run. Jarrett stays in power.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

The wookie is hated as much as the hag, and respected even less

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

Not by the left.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

Even my liberal in laws think she is nuts. They can't just get the black black vote. They have to get their entire base plus some.

It is one thing to vote for a handsome loquacious black man. It is another thing to vote for his meddlesome shrill wife.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

Interesting thing with the Wookie; she may not have the young adult vote, either.

I was talking to my son, a while back (and he'll be able to vote, come next election), and it seems that the Obama's are very unpopular with the young folk. The student body (at his school, at least ) despises the Obama administration.

It has nothing to do with politics; it's all about the food. They hate the school menu imposed by the Wookie, thus they hate the Wookie.

[ Post made via Mobile Device ]

I think the coming civil war would start the day the Wookie announces tossing her hat in the ring.

Monarchy building is illegal per the constitution. Having her be POTUS violates the very principle of 22nd Amendment. The family monarchy would continue. That is also why I hated W in the seat and Jeb shouldn't even think about it.

I think people are a little tired of Hillary.