UNITED STATES v. CASTLEMAN ( ) 695 F. 3d 582
Posted: Wed, 02 Jul 2014 10:43:30
Haven't posted for a while, but saw this and saw the VSP site and it TICKED me off
OK, has anyone seen this UNITED STATES v. CASTLEMAN ( ) 695 F. 3d 582?
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/12-1371
Then I saw the VSP test for purchase and owning a fire arm:
Have you ever been convicted for the misdemeanor crime of domestic violence? This includes all misdemeanors that involve the use, threat of, or attempted use of physical force (e.g., simple assault, assault and battery) if the offense is committed by one of the following parties: a current or former spouse, parent, or guardian of the victim, by a person with whom the victim shares a child in common, by a person who is cohabiting with or has cohabited with the victim as a spouse, parent or guardian, or by a person similarly situated to a spouse, parent or guardian of the victim.
It seems to me after reading the opinion the VSP have dictated gun laws the way they wanted not what SCOTUS ruled.
OK, has anyone seen this UNITED STATES v. CASTLEMAN ( ) 695 F. 3d 582?
http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/12-1371
Then I saw the VSP test for purchase and owning a fire arm:
Have you ever been convicted for the misdemeanor crime of domestic violence? This includes all misdemeanors that involve the use, threat of, or attempted use of physical force (e.g., simple assault, assault and battery) if the offense is committed by one of the following parties: a current or former spouse, parent, or guardian of the victim, by a person with whom the victim shares a child in common, by a person who is cohabiting with or has cohabited with the victim as a spouse, parent or guardian, or by a person similarly situated to a spouse, parent or guardian of the victim.
It seems to me after reading the opinion the VSP have dictated gun laws the way they wanted not what SCOTUS ruled.