Page 1 of 1

Gun "control" dichotomies

Posted: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 22:19:19
by AlanM
A dichotomy is defined as two ideas or concepts that are in opposition.
How many can we come up with that are in current use?

Here's one that just bubbled up into my conscious mind.

Why is it that a "No Guns Allowed" sign is expected to prevent bad guys from entering and shooting the up place but we are being pressured to lock up all of our self-defense tools because the bad guys can't be trusted to not illegally steal them?

Re: Gun "control" dichotomies

Posted: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 17:49:00
by MarcSpaz
Its like the tree-huggering anti-gunners who say the military are murderers and baby killers when they oppose military action... but when they have the anti-gun debate, those same people say the only people who can be trusted with "assault weapons" and "weapons of war" are the military. What a bunch of tards.

Re: Gun "control" dichotomies

Posted: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:40:24
by vonClausewitz
Image

Re: Gun "control" dichotomies

Posted: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 09:52:42
by dorminWS
What about a government that stops at no unconstitutional act to deny firearms to its citizens and emasculates its military forces, but rapidly militarizes existing police and regulatory agencies and hoards tanks and bullets for use by them?

Re: Gun "control" dichotomies

Posted: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 14:36:55
by MarcSpaz
They live by hypocrisy, double standards and lies.

I have said 100 times, we have the greatest government that has ever been and may ever be. Its the people running it that are screwing it up.