Page 1 of 2
Sarvis? "you'd be insane"
Posted: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 12:34:03
by ratherfish
On Monday, former Congressman and staunch
libertarian Ron Paul (R-TX) campaigned for Virginia Republican Governor candidate Ken Cuccinelli and said Virginias would be giving up on liberty if they voted for Democrat Terry McAuliffe in Tuesday's election and would be "insane" if they voted for so-called libertarian Robert Sarvis, the third-party candidate who may siphon enough votes from Cuccinelli to spoil the election.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government ... ert-Sarvis
Re: Sarvis? "you'd be insane"
Posted: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:21:09
by SpanishInquisition
Vote Sarvis- ratherfish hates him!
What's your campaign donation up to now, pal?
Sarvis? "you'd be insane"
Posted: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 13:44:17
by scrubber3
Re: Sarvis? "you'd be insane"
Posted: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 15:46:51
by ratherfish
Sorry SI. I'm in and out between driving prople to the polls.
I'm getting the feeling responding to you is futile because you evidently refuse to read anything posted, lack the mental abilities to form an informed conclusion and cannot do simple math.
Even Ron Paul can't get through to you...
Seems you're just trying to get a response and have no purpose other than a troll.
Good day.
Re: Sarvis? "you'd be insane"
Posted: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 16:00:50
by scrubber3
ratherfish wrote:Sorry SI. I'm in and out between driving prople to the polls.
I'm getting the feeling responding to you is futile because you evidently refuse to read anything posted, lack the mental abilities to form an informed conclusion and cannot do simple math.
Even Ron Paul can't get through to you...
Seems you're just trying to get a response and have no purpose other than a troll.
Good day.
I'd actually written something to that effect, but declined to post it fearing someone may get ruffled feathers... But what the hay.
Good on you brother for making the effort! God willing, KC will win this and our state can be on the forefront. Godspeed sir.
Re: Sarvis?
Posted: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 16:15:17
by Remek
scrubber3 wrote:ratherfish wrote:Sorry SI. I'm in and out between driving prople to the polls.
I'm getting the feeling responding to you is futile because you evidently refuse to read anything posted, lack the mental abilities to form an informed conclusion and cannot do simple math.
Even Ron Paul can't get through to you...
Seems you're just trying to get a response and have no purpose other than a troll.
Good day.
I'd actually written something to that effect, but declined to post it fearing someone may get ruffled feathers... But what the hay.
Good on you brother for making the effort! God willing, KC will win this and our state can be on the forefront. Godspeed sir.
Feeling the same, and pulling for KC! Keep it up! I have been talking to people everywhere. Hope it does some good.
Re: Sarvis? "you'd be insane"
Posted: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 23:14:55
by scrubber3
Now that its known how things panned out, I'd like to thank Sarvis and the tools that voted for him for our new socialist state. VA is officially blue. A lot of progress is about to be undone in the commonwealth. Hang your heads in shame
Re: Sarvis? "you'd be insane"
Posted: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 23:15:53
by Remek
^^^^ this!
[ Post made via Mobile Device ] 
Re: Sarvis? "you'd be insane"
Posted: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 23:17:06
by SpanishInquisition
Yes yes. Blame others for your candidate not being the better of the three in the eyes of the populace.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ] 
Re: Sarvis? "you'd be insane"
Posted: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 23:18:12
by Remek
Man you HAVE to be a banner.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ] 
Re: Sarvis? "you'd be insane"
Posted: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 00:06:14
by Reverenddel
Bluntly.
Thanks for absolutely nothing. You Perot-wannabe "AH DIDN'T VOTE FER HIM! I VOTED FOR SSSSAAAARRRVVVIISSS!!!"
You took my beautiful, conservative Commonwealth, and have now made it unlivable.
Re: Sarvis? "you'd be insane"
Posted: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 00:35:05
by scrubber3
Sarvis voters: That moment when you realize you are the sole reason this guy got into office. And you'll still defend your position claiming moral high ground when in fact those that voted for sarvis were nothing more than tools. Tools of the socialist minded New Yorker for that matter. Don't for a second ever claim you are pro gun. Especially on a gun forum.
Brash? Yes, but I'm ticked off.
Re: Sarvis? "you'd be insane"
Posted: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 00:47:25
by vaeevictiss
Can we just cancel the accounts of everyone here that voted sarvis lol.
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
Re: Sarvis? "you'd be insane"
Posted: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 01:25:29
by moss20
Virginia's new motto: Home of the Yankee Carpetbaggers!
Re: Sarvis? "you'd be insane"
Posted: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 01:34:35
by Remek
Don't forget, they're bloomberg owned carpetbaggers!
[ Post made via Mobile Device ] 
Re: Sarvis? "you'd be insane"
Posted: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 01:44:22
by DBJohnson
The fact that the GOP has refused to put forth truly Liberty-based candidates for any office above state representative since 1994 doesn't bear part of the responsibility??? The GOP's dedication to tyranny through the Patriot Act and it's continued renewal hasn't played a part in energizing the Libertarian movement???
Hold your party leadership (both state and national) accountable for their choices.
Seriously. Reading the teeth-gnashing and watching the ashes fly through the air would be funny if it weren't so damned sad.
(Show me the way to the pillory since most are too married to the R to listen to reason.)
[ Post made via Mobile Device ] 
Re: Sarvis? "you'd be insane"
Posted: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 06:11:19
by 38superfan
It won't be soooo bad. Right guys? Didn't Macawful promise, "If you like your gun, you can keep it."
Seriously. Patrick Henry is turning over in his grave and I'm looking for jobs out west.
A totally self serving effort by libertarians in cohoots with the Obama/Clinton machines. Also, we can't not blame the GOP. it left MC out to dry. Great job RNC, you've continued your ability to consistently lose elections, turn the country over to Leviathan, and run our country into the ground.
Re: Sarvis? "you'd be insane"
Posted: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 07:50:15
by zykur
Scrubber I couldn't have said it better. When the margin was less than 2% you can't say that the Sarvis vote wouldn't have helped Ken.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ] 
Re: Sarvis? "you'd be insane"
Posted: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 08:30:15
by scrubber3
FYI, I'm not married to the Republican party.... I just have the wonderful ability to reason.
Re: Sarvis? "you'd be insane"
Posted: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 08:45:00
by j1mmyd
DBJohnson wrote:
Hold your party leadership (both state and national) accountable for their choices.
^THIS^ starts today. Also time to attack the non-Liberty elements of the party platform. You're not pro-liberty if you want the government to regulate what a person does to or with their own body or in the privacy of their own home. <<-- These are the reasons KC lost. They allowed these to become points of contention and failed to counter the exaggerations of the Left.