Virginia Gun Owners Forum - VGOF

Gunfire and explosions heard. As many as 10 people in the house. Thius according to SWMBO, who is glued to the TV at the house. I hope they kill'em reeeal slow.

Better idea - hold him in jail for a year. Bring him to the next Boston Marathon, drop him in the middle of the street, and give him a 30 second head start.

At least a 72 day all bacon diet before execution. 1 day's ration of bacon for each of his promised virgins.


...after a fair trial, of course.

SpanishInquisition wrote:At least a 72 day all bacon diet before execution. 1 day's ration of bacon for each of his promised virgins.


...after a fair trial, of course.

On a side note, what was that about immigration reform, Mr President?

SpanishInquisition wrote: On a side note, what was that about immigration reform, Mr President?

He's been too busy trying to disarm us to do anything that might protect us.

Dead Guy has an interesting youtube page:
http://www.youtube.com/user/muazseyfullah/feed?filter=2

Just kill the SOBs.

just heard shots fired on TV in Watertown. Cops now moving to another location

Here's a video of the shootout. Halfway through, the video resets and plays again, so the true video is only just over a minute long. Quite a hail of gunfire can be heard at the end.

It's dark, so that must be the shootout with the first bomber, right?

ya know, im probably gonna sound soft, and trust me...i would like to see these bastards dead and i was happy to hear the first one was.

But we cannot just kill them without a trial (obviously unless they resist and fire upon police). If they are captured they need to be givin a trial and you know that. it is right in the god damn constitution. Here we are trying to save one of the amendments that is so crucial, but were just going to let another one go to the wayside on emotions? That is exactly what this is. People are upset because of the death and injuries, so we want to make a snap judgement and ignore these peoples rights...scumbags as they may be.

Im pretty sure we all bitched at how the country wanted to pass rampant gun control only after children were murdered. We know for a fact it was so emotion filled it was sickening. If you want to protect the constitution, you cant just pick and choose the parts you like...


just some food for thought...

vaeevictiss wrote: But we cannot just kill them without a trial (obviously unless they resist and fire upon police).

Uh, they already did.

We don't need another dead cop just because we want to "go by the book". This last guy is armed and probably intends to blow himself up if captured.

Shoot the F***er from a safe distance if at all possible. Two to the chest. One to the head.

This guy is not going to be captured alive, and he's going to try to take others with him. It's what terrorists do. Personally, I'd love for it to be a regular citizen with a gun that takes him out.

dorminWS wrote:It's dark, so that must be the shootout with the first bomber, right?

Yes.

vaeevictiss wrote:ya know, im probably gonna sound soft, and trust me...i would like to see these bastards dead and i was happy to hear the first one was.

But we cannot just kill them without a trial (obviously unless they resist and fire upon police). If they are captured they need to be givin a trial and you know that. it is right in the god damn constitution. Here we are trying to save one of the amendments that is so crucial, but were just going to let another one go to the wayside on emotions? That is exactly what this is. People are upset because of the death and injuries, so we want to make a snap judgement and ignore these peoples rights...scumbags as they may be.

Im pretty sure we all bitched at how the country wanted to pass rampant gun control only after children were murdered. We know for a fact it was so emotion filled it was sickening. If you want to protect the constitution, you cant just pick and choose the parts you like...


just some food for thought...

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Of course, you are right. But there still ain't no shame in wishing them dead; or in being honest enough to admit it. That's what sets us apart from most of the rest of the world; we don't ignore the basic rights even of those who don't deserve them.

Oh, I'm all for strictly observing their constitutional rights. But I also hope to Jesus they resist arrest violently and with deadly force and get their asses killed constitutionally as hell.

I guess it depends on if he's classified as a criminal or enemy combatant.

I just hope that whatever the outcome, enough intel is gathered to find out if they were acting alone or if they had other cohorts.

vaeevictiss wrote:If they are captured they need to be givin a trial and you know that. it is right in the god damn constitution.

Are they US citizens?

If not, this is an act of war. They don't have constitutional rights.

dorminWS wrote: But I also hope to Jesus they resist arrest violently and with deadly force and get their asses killed constitutionally as hell.

this part i can agree with lol.

TheGodfather wrote:

vaeevictiss wrote:If they are captured they need to be givin a trial and you know that. it is right in the god damn constitution.

Are they US citizens?

If not, this is an act of war. They don't have constitutional rights.

i thought they said they were, for the last year. they may have just been living here.

as far as that even if that is the case...many will argue that the constitution simply outlines basic human rights as given by god, citizen of the US or not...but meh...thats a gray area.

The part i do hate is that if they are convicted, that the could spend life in prison. So wheres the justice. Just kill them and stop making the taxpayer support them. But thats a problem with the injustice system not the constitution.

Their uncle just called them "losers, not being able to settle themselves".