Poll results of >15,000 front line LEOs

General discussion - Feel free to discuss anything you want here. Firearm related is preferred, but not required
Post Reply
User avatar
AlanM
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 1842
Joined: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 11:05:15
Location: Charlottesville now. Was Stow, OH

Poll results of >15,000 front line LEOs

Post by AlanM »

PoliceOne's Gun Control Survey: 11 key lessons from officers' perspectives


The following quotes are the start and end of the article. Make sure to follow the above link and see how the rank and file LEOs really feel about gun control.
In March, PoliceOne conducted the most comprehensive survey ever of American law enforcement officers’ opinions on the topic gripping the nation's attention in recent weeks: gun control.

More than 15,000 verified law enforcement professionals took part in the survey, which aimed to bring together the thoughts and opinions of the only professional group devoted to limiting and defeating gun violence as part of their sworn responsibility.

Totaling just shy of 30 questions, the survey allowed officers across the United States to share their perspectives on issues spanning from gun control and gun violence to gun rights.

Bottom Line Conclusions
Quite clearly, the majority of officers polled oppose the theories brought forth by gun-control advocates who claim that proposed restrictions on weapon capabilities and production would reduce crime.

In fact, many officers responding to this survey seem to feel that those controls will negatively affect their ability to fight violent criminals.

Contrary to what the mainstream media and certain politicians would have us believe, police overwhelmingly favor an armed citizenry, would like to see more guns in the hands of responsible people, and are skeptical of any greater restrictions placed on gun purchase, ownership, or accessibility.

The officers patrolling America’s streets have a deeply-vested interest — and perhaps the most relevant interest — in making sure that decisions related to controlling, monitoring, restricting, as well as supporting and/or prohibiting an armed populace are wise and effective. With this survey, their voice has been heard.
AlanM
There are no dangerous weapons; there are only dangerous men. - RAH
Four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo - use in that order.
If you aren't part of the solution, then you obviously weren't properly dissolved.
User avatar
Alex
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 189
Joined: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:33:39
Location: Charlottesville, VA

Re: Poll results of >15,000 front line LEOs

Post by Alex »

Criminals don't obey laws. It's no more complicated than that. LEO's know this first hand.
"In God we trust, all others will be checked for warrants."
User avatar
CalebDor
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 110
Joined: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:56:42
Location: Fredericksburg, Virginia

Re: Poll results of >15,000 front line LEOs

Post by CalebDor »

Each and every law enforcement officer I have ever spoke with was all for responsible, individual citizens, possessing firearms. An officer cannot be everywhere...even if you post a trooper on each corner.

The men and women who decide how well we're protected aren't the brave women and men in uniform. It's not even the folks in the state and federal legislatures. It's all about us. We the people decide that.

Criminals don't obey laws. Politicians who crave ultimate power don't obey laws. That's why they're both to be resisted.

That is why We the people want our guns.


God bless each of you.
User avatar
Tweaker
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 995
Joined: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:00:37
Location: Left Charlibsville, VA for SC, near CLT, NC

Re: Poll results of >15,000 front line LEOs

Post by Tweaker »

That makes me feel much better. Living and working in cesspools of idiocy and corruption has left me quite jaded and skeptical of LEOs.
Officially outed waissists: Taggure, Allingeneral, Tweaker, VBShooter, Snaz, Jim, OakRidgeStars, Wylde, clayinva, Komrade Kreutz, scrubber3, Mindflaya'. All the kewl kids are waississ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTsW75KJ ... re=related
User avatar
SHMIV
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 5741
Joined: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:15:31
Location: Where ever I go, there I am.

Re: Poll results of >15,000 front line LEOs

Post by SHMIV »

I'm STILL jaded, and skeptical of LEO's. LEO forum members, forgive me, I know that there are good ones, but I know that there are bad ones, too. And sometimes it's hard to tell which one I'm talking to.

I'm also skeptical of many other types of government employee, as well. And, government in general.

That said, I am glad to see this report. I wish I knew who the minority LEO's were. I want to steer clear of their juristictions!

[ Post made via Mobile Device ] Image
User avatar
Kreutz
VGOF Silver Supporter
VGOF Silver Supporter
Posts: 4318
Joined: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:26:42

Re: Poll results of >15,000 front line LEOs

Post by Kreutz »

SHMIV wrote:I'm STILL jaded, and skeptical of LEO's. LEO forum members, forgive me, I know that there are good ones, but I know that there are bad ones, too. And sometimes it's hard to tell which one I'm talking to.
Truth. Be wary of anyone who can execute you and get paid vacation for it.
User avatar
Taggure
Sharp Shooter
Sharp Shooter
Posts: 2718
Joined: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:43:59

Re: Poll results of >15,000 front line LEOs

Post by Taggure »

I was glad to see that it was a wide sampling unlike so many other surveys that only poll 250 - 1500 people. I have a little more faith in these numbers then most. The questions looked straight to the point and not confusing with a hidden agenda.
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms."
Thomas Jefferson
SAEPE EXPERTUS, SEMPER FIDELIS, FRATRES AETERNI
(Often Tested, Always Faithful, Brothers Forever)
User avatar
FiremanBob
VGOF Bronze Supporter
VGOF Bronze Supporter
Posts: 2083
Joined: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:50:05

Re: Poll results of >15,000 front line LEOs

Post by FiremanBob »

On the other hand, this: http://reason.com/blog/2013/04/08/man-f ... ing-himsel

quote:

Richard Ahlstrand, of Auburn, Massachusetts, faces criminal charges after encountering a bear in his back yard and shooting the damned thing to avoid being mauled or eaten. Specifically, as noted at Reason 24/7, he's charged with "illegally killing a bear, illegally baiting a bear, illegal possession of a firearm and failure to secure a firearm." All of these charges, once translated from Massachusetts to American, seem to stack up to outrage that Ahlstrand didn't make his yard completely inhospitable to animals that are rarely seen in the area, and then investigated a suspicious noise with a weapon in hand rather than cower under the bed. Worst of all, he actually defended himself when he encountered danger.
Author of The 10/22 Companion: How to Operate, Troubleshoot, Maintain and Improve Your Ruger 10/22
1022Companion.com
Project Appleseed Instructor
User avatar
SpanishInquisition
VGOF Bronze Supporter
VGOF Bronze Supporter
Posts: 1461
Joined: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 14:22:37

Re: Poll results of >15,000 front line LEOs

Post by SpanishInquisition »

Interesting survey. It certainly flies in the face of what the Dems are claiming.
Image
User avatar
Kreutz
VGOF Silver Supporter
VGOF Silver Supporter
Posts: 4318
Joined: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 10:26:42

Re: Poll results of >15,000 front line LEOs

Post by Kreutz »

FiremanBob wrote:On the other hand, this: http://reason.com/blog/2013/04/08/man-f ... ing-himsel

quote:

Richard Ahlstrand, of Auburn, Massachusetts, faces criminal charges after encountering a bear in his back yard and shooting the damned thing to avoid being mauled or eaten. Specifically, as noted at Reason 24/7, he's charged with "illegally killing a bear, illegally baiting a bear, illegal possession of a firearm and failure to secure a firearm." All of these charges, once translated from Massachusetts to American, seem to stack up to outrage that Ahlstrand didn't make his yard completely inhospitable to animals that are rarely seen in the area, and then investigated a suspicious noise with a weapon in hand rather than cower under the bed. Worst of all, he actually defended himself when he encountered danger.

He should have thought twice before shooting Barney Franks boyfriend.

:whistle:
User avatar
DryBones
VGOF Silver Supporter
VGOF Silver Supporter
Posts: 527
Joined: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 12:56:14

Re: Poll results of >15,000 front line LEOs

Post by DryBones »

actually he should know better than to leave 50 gallons of birdseed outside. just inviting trouble, like putting your trash outside for pickup the night before and wondering why the raccoon keep tearing the bags open and making a mess of your yard. common sense, especially if he thought he saw a bear the day before. I've seen first hand what a bear will do to get at a bird feeder. I've had them on my front porch, standing on their hind legs with their front paws on my railing, reaching for my feeder. Scared him off and took in the feeders for the season. I use to see them around every spring and fall when I lived outside of Marshall, VA.
User avatar
snatale42
VGOF Bronze Supporter
VGOF Bronze Supporter
Posts: 211
Joined: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 16:12:06
Location: Henrico

Re: Poll results of >15,000 front line LEOs

Post by snatale42 »

FiremanBob wrote:On the other hand, this: http://reason.com/blog/2013/04/08/man-f ... ing-himsel

quote:

Richard Ahlstrand, of Auburn, Massachusetts, faces criminal charges after encountering a bear in his back yard and shooting the damned thing to avoid being mauled or eaten. Specifically, as noted at Reason 24/7, he's charged with "illegally killing a bear, illegally baiting a bear, illegal possession of a firearm and failure to secure a firearm." All of these charges, once translated from Massachusetts to American, seem to stack up to outrage that Ahlstrand didn't make his yard completely inhospitable to animals that are rarely seen in the area, and then investigated a suspicious noise with a weapon in hand rather than cower under the bed. Worst of all, he actually defended himself when he encountered danger.

Crap like that is what makes me glad I moved out of MA, what's BS is that he was supposedly in "illegal possession" of the guns. In MA you do need a permit in general but it's not hard to get and that's probably why there screwing with him. I don't miss the Commiewealth of MA at all.
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”