Page 1 of 2
Where's the DOJ on this one?
Posted: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:06:41
by Geezer
Can you imagine the ton o'crap coming down on the tweeter if the race shoe was on the other foot?
Read the responses too
http://twitchy.com/2012/04/23/twitter-l ... -kill-him/
Re: Where's the DOJ on this one?
Posted: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 12:38:44
by vaeevictiss
Wow that's crazy.
Nice tweets by some nice white suburban dwelling Jewish kids right there lol.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Re: Where's the DOJ on this one?
Posted: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:26:53
by ratherfish
There's a march to support Zimmerman this coming weekend. Should be interesting.
Re: Where's the DOJ on this one?
Posted: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:01:09
by KaosDad
Imma gonna praktis my madd gang langwage skillz.....
Re: Where's the DOJ on this one?
Posted: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:36:18
by dorminWS
KaosDad wrote:Imma gonna praktis my madd gang langwage skillz.....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Well, you've got a long way to go. You forgot to say "muthaf#cka".

Re: Where's the DOJ on this one?
Posted: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:21:54
by KaosDad
dorminWS wrote:KaosDad wrote:Imma gonna praktis my madd gang langwage skillz.....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Well, you've got a long way to go. You forgot to say "muthaf#cka".

#DOH!
Re: Where's the DOJ on this one?
Posted: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:57:29
by mamabearCali
All of this worries me a whole whole lot. Unless the prosecutor has some really juicy evidence up her sleeve (which I doubt) this fellow if there is any justice left in this world will be exonerated. I am worried that a portion of these numbskulls (family friendly term) might actually go out and race riot. Those who live and work in cities (and maybe even suburbs), unless they happen to have the correct amount of melanin, could be in danger. How long will it be allowed to ensue? What do we need to do to get ready to protect ourselves and our families?
On a somewhat lighter note and more pleasant note---guess that gives me the excuse I need to get that shotty I have been wanting.

Yeah for not letting a disaster go to waste.

Re: Where's the DOJ on this one?
Posted: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:11:12
by allingeneral
Seems to me that every one of these twitter accounts should be investigated and the owners should be brought up on charges. Threatening to kill someone is not legal, nor is it moral.
Don't give me any crap about how your twitter account was hacked and you never really said that, either.
Re: Where's the DOJ on this one?
Posted: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 16:39:45
by KaosDad
allingeneral wrote:Seems to me that every one of these twitter accounts should be investigated and the owners should be brought up on charges. Threatening to kill someone is not legal, nor is it moral.
Don't give me any crap about how your twitter account was hacked and you never really said that, either.
This. I am fairly certain that because the webbernets were used, Federal charges of "death threats" and hate crime can be levied against the twits. Err.... Twitterers. Tweeters?
Re: Where's the DOJ on this one?
Posted: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:10:33
by ratherfish
I'll go with twits.
Re: Where's the DOJ on this one?
Posted: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:17:56
by Geezer
Re: Where's the DOJ on this one?
Posted: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 18:46:08
by VBshooter
Christ and they thought the Klan was nasty... DOJ will be out to lunch on this and any other Black related nonsense that the children can come out with,,, As they love to remind us<< "We owes Them" Yup we sure do and Happy Bull$hit and a Hardy "Get Bent" to you Uncle Al , Black Panthers and all you other friggin clowns
Re: Where's the DOJ on this one?
Posted: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 07:58:30
by Kreutz
dorminWS wrote:KaosDad wrote:Imma gonna praktis my madd gang langwage skillz.....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Well, you've got a long way to go. You forgot to say "muthaf#cka".

he forgot to throw in "muh dikk" after every other muthaf#cka.
Semi-seriously though, didnt the judge strip GZ of his right to bear arms as a bail condition? Bit like sending him into slaughter no?
Re: Where's the DOJ on this one?
Posted: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 01:08:32
by Diomed
Kreutz wrote:Semi-seriously though, didnt the judge strip GZ of his right to bear arms as a bail condition? Bit like sending him into slaughter no?
That's one way of sweeping this sham under the rug. Dead defendant and the whole thing just goes away.
Re: Where's the DOJ on this one?
Posted: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:06:08
by Taggure
I have the same question about this incident
No Arrests In Matthew Owens Beating, Tensions High
http://www2.wkrg.com/news/2012/apr/23/5 ... r-3659891/
The reporters are making it out that the victim deserved it because he had a record, and try to downplay the fact that as they were beating him the attackers were heard saying
The neighbor, too scared to go on camera, told News 5's Lauren Vargas that they heard one of the suspects say "This is justice for Trayvon" as she drove away.
Re: Where's the DOJ on this one?
Posted: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:58:28
by Geezer
The reporters are making it out that the victim deserved it because he had a record, and try to downplay the fact that as they were beating him the attackers were heard saying
They should have used a picture of the victim when he was 13 yrs. old.

Re: Where's the DOJ on this one?
Posted: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:23:01
by gregj
RE the Owens beating case, here's an update I found this am:
http://www2.wkrg.com/news/2012/apr/25/m ... r-3674943/
MOBILE, Alabama --
Mobile Police made their first arrest in the mob beating of Matthew Owens. 44-year-old Terry Rawls surrendered Wednesday on assault charges.
"This here is an ongoing dispute with neighbors, that's what this is," explained Corporal Chris Levy with the Mobile Police Department.
"I can tell you without a doubt 100 percent that the Trayvon Martin case was not the motivating factor, said Levy. "That 100 percent, it is an ongoing incident between people that have been fighting for a few years now."
Re: Where's the DOJ on this one?
Posted: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:13:49
by SilentServiceVet
gregj wrote:RE the Owens beating case, here's an update I found this am:
http://www2.wkrg.com/news/2012/apr/25/m ... r-3674943/
MOBILE, Alabama --
Mobile Police made their first arrest in the mob beating of Matthew Owens. 44-year-old Terry Rawls surrendered Wednesday on assault charges.
"This here is an ongoing dispute with neighbors, that's what this is," explained Corporal Chris Levy with the Mobile Police Department.
"I can tell you without a doubt 100 percent that the Trayvon Martin case was not the motivating factor, said Levy. "That 100 percent, it is an ongoing incident between people that have been fighting for a few years now."
I read that article too. If it's not a hate crime, or race-related, then why did one of the attackers mention Trayvon's name? An eye witness and Owens' sister both say they heard it.
The Mayor (African-American, Sam Jones) has come out and said the attack is not "even a race issue" and "the fact that one of the attackers allegedly said, 'Now that's justic for Trayvon' has been blown out of proportion." How does he have all the facts when the Mobile, AL, police department are urging people to withhold judgment until "all the facts are out"?
No racial slurs were uttered in the Zimmerman/Martin attack, and yet it didn't stop Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, Louis Farrakhan, and the New Black Panthers from claiming it was a racially motivated hate crime. Seeing these double standards we've been forced to swallow for years is maddening. When will the authorities finally start enforcing charges against minorites for actual hate crimes instead of just against "white" Americans and "white Hispanics"?
Re: Where's the DOJ on this one?
Posted: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 07:39:28
by Taggure
Well we can say for sure that if it had been 20 White folks show up and beat a Black man with pipes and chairs that it would have been racially motivated, but when the shoe is on the other foot we can't say that. I call the Bull Sh!t meter on this one.
Re: Where's the DOJ on this one?
Posted: Wed, 02 May 2012 10:52:56
by Reverenddel
Hence three words: I CARRY FIREARMS.
When i call 911, it's for "cleanup", not "protection". Dot your i's, cross your t's, have a good lawyer's phone number in speed dial, and when questioned, simply keep saying "I was in fear for my life, and felt it necessary to defend myself, I'd rather have an attorney present for any further questioning, thank you."
AND USE YOUR RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT! YOU WILL BE DETAINED, CUFFED, AND QUESTIONED!