Salinas City (California) Councilwoman is found to illegally have an "assault weapon." It came to light because someone broke into her house and stole it.
Will they press charges against her for owning an illegal (in California) "assault weapon"?
Of course not.
Think you or I - or anyone who was not on the city council - would get the same treatment?
Hmmm.... I wonder....
Guns for me, but not for thee
Guns for me, but not for thee
"[The swords of the militia], and every terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American."
-
makarovman
- Sighting In
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 20:48:59
Re: Guns for me, but not for thee
we would be used as an example and sent up river for a very long time
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Re: Guns for me, but not for thee
City council members don't make state laws, and there's no evidence this person is anti gun. Most of California by area is actually conservative. It's the two population centers of San Francisco and Los Angeles that swing opposite.
Also, it seems that no charges are being pressed because there isn't enough evidence. Owning an AK isn't illegal unless it's a model specifically on the ban list, and 30 round magazines aren't illegal to own if you had them pre ban.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Also, it seems that no charges are being pressed because there isn't enough evidence. Owning an AK isn't illegal unless it's a model specifically on the ban list, and 30 round magazines aren't illegal to own if you had them pre ban.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
Never initiate force against another. But should someone do violence to you, retaliate without hesitation, without reservation, without quarter, until you are sure that he will never wish to harm - or never be capable of harming - you or yours again.KYFHO