
I'm thinking about buying another gun and I've read some positive reviews about this one. Anyone have any experience with it?
Just slowly trying to build my collection of various guns for recreational enjoyment. I've already got a 10/22, SKS and AK-47 - the AR-15 is next on my wish list.gunderwood wrote: What is the purpose of the rifle?
There's only so much you can change and remain compatible. Does the E3 bolt require a different or special barrel extension or anything besides the obvious bolt/extractor changes?RocKor wrote:The E3 bolt has a beefier extractor that has two (instead of the milspec one) extractor springs, as well as several improvements to the bolt face, locking lugs, and cam pin hole to increase overall quality and reliability of the bolt. All it really needs is an optic and it's good to go.
From what I understand, there are/were two versions of the E3 bolt. One version is/was sold as a stand alone and has regular locking lugs for regular AR-style barrel extensions. The one that ships within the SR-15 rifle has the enhanced locking lugs and is proprietary and only fits the barrel extension present on the Knight's rifles, again from what i understand.gunderwood wrote:There's only so much you can change and remain compatible. Does the E3 bolt require a different or special barrel extension or anything besides the obvious bolt/extractor changes?RocKor wrote:The E3 bolt has a beefier extractor that has two (instead of the milspec one) extractor springs, as well as several improvements to the bolt face, locking lugs, and cam pin hole to increase overall quality and reliability of the bolt. All it really needs is an optic and it's good to go.
Admittedly, I haven't kept up on Knights development, but I'd guess isn't an attempt to fix the carbine broken lug issue. Adding ~1.5" of barrel to a gas system really designed for a 14.5" barrel was causing some problems...especially if you suppress it. Also, going below 12" was an issue too.breacher wrote:Yes there is a proprietary extension.
Regarding the E3, the big difference (besides dual extractor springs) is that the lugs are rounded, the extractor hook is beefier, and the cam pin is narrowed for strength. it's something new, whether it's an improvement who knows, its a nice design for what it is.
I like my IWS and it always gets attention where ever we go, but I have AR's I built from a variety of high-end manufactures parts that cost much less and easily out-shoot it any day.
Makes sense, basic engineering saws that rounded corners are more durable and unlikely to break. The question how often do regular lugs break off? Anyone every had one break?breacher wrote:Agreed.
Under extreme full-auto, which would be most likely when that could happen, KAC claims their 'rounded' lugs will outlast the traditional design. I have no way to test this claim, I do own a select fire lower but I don't make enough money to cover ammo cost.
That's a good argument for a KAC toy. As long as you treat it like a range queen (let's be honest, most are), it's probably a good investment.breacher wrote:To get back on topic, another reason to buy an IWS is that KAC anything holds its value better then any other brand. Back on 2006 when KAC was not selling to the public, I sold my slightly used M4 RAS forend I bought for $350.00 new and it was bid up to $640.00 which is nuts. People go crazy for KAC.