Page 4 of 4

Re: Our affiliation with OathKeepers

Posted: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:25:54
by chfaunce
Edfastdraw wrote:This is a rogue group nothing more, for those who like to read and study history read about the political atmosphere in Europe in the 30's, which led to second world war, more specifically in Germany, yeah yeah say what you want, I might not like the president but he is what he is, the boss, I didn't like bush either , but I owed my loyalty to him, that is how it works, for real men though, those people running around unhappy, trying to subvert whatever thy don't like, I'm familiar with them, there's always a good amount of them in every classroom I ever went too, only on those days, it was about a teacher they didn't like, or homework they didn't want to do.
Get real, If you beliebe in the constitution of the United States of America you should know where your loyalty lays.
1933 poster about the sa
Holy fark dude, that's a LOT of commas.

Re: Our affiliation with OathKeepers

Posted: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:44:53
by Taggure
16 Commas in a 7 line sentence Yeap that is a lot of
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,'s

:hysterical:

Re: Our affiliation with OathKeepers

Posted: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:56:42
by chfaunce
Punctuation key gnomes strike again, leaving Edfastdraw with only a comma and this thing: "<". And that would just look downright silly.

Re: Our affiliation with OathKeepers

Posted: Mon, 09 Aug 2010 12:18:32
by Jakeiscrazy
Dude to use a WWII movie title (and an dang good one to boot) you are trying to Go A Bridge Too Far with this.
Now that's a good movie! :hysterical: