ratherfish wrote:The only chance Sarvis has is as a Democrat spoiler electing McClinton.
Actually there are a good number of dem co-workers of mine that will NOT be voting for McAuliff. They're not voting for Cooch either.

ratherfish wrote:The only chance Sarvis has is as a Democrat spoiler electing McClinton.



Pot...kettle...SpanishInquisition wrote:
Debate? LOL Actually, I think it's funny how few of your posts have any actual content.

(place ridicule of your background here)SpanishInquisition wrote:ratherfish wrote:Seems the internet protocol of
NOT SHOUTING
Is more impoortant than holding on to our guns. For the suddenly reserved....please note that a general comment is not personal unless you take it so.
Funny how many so called "libertarians" adopt the thin skinned style of liberals when debating politics. Frankly if you're not passionate you're playing. Aren't we getting enough sandbox politicians at the moment?
How bout sheer truth??????
http://hotair.com/archives/2013/10/17/v ... -all-time/
Debate? LOL Actually, I think it's funny how few of your posts have any actual content. For someone with an apparent SIGINT background, your S/N ratio is incredibly low. I've posted the stance of Sarvis on many issues, yet when I mention one plank in the platform you instantly accuse of single-issuedom.
Name calling, blathering and ALL CAPS BS is not debate and you should know better.
Should McAuliff win, I will ridicule YOU for not voting for the best candidate, Sarvis, Mister Blame Game.
I think what happened last night in DC will tell us more about the mid-terms than the VA Gubernatorial race will. How about that 2 BILLION + in pork for the Senate Minority leader?

He's got practically nothing in the polls. The people believe the polls (although if you know anything, they are designed to achieve the result the poll-payer asks for). Unfortunately, this means most people believe McAwful will win, that Cooch stands an outside chance, and that Sarvis is really a non-issue.ShotgunBlast wrote:
Yes, but as you've said the legislature is pro-gun and I don't think either of us expect that to change. We didn't just survive the worst onslaught against gun rights last year, we freaking trampled the anti-gunners. With almost everything not even getting out of committee, the governor's position on the matter is still moot. It's a shame that you're copping out with the "if he stood a chance I'd vote for him" line. You know how he stands a chance? By people voting for him! I don't understand how people think he'll magically become a viable candidate if everyone waits for everyone else to vote for him.




I've heard this as well. Bolling did not like the convention format being used this year so he dropped out in protest. Interesting position considering that's how he, KC, and Gov Bob got selected to run in 2009.Kreutz wrote:I'm relatively new to Virginia but I've seen more than one comment stating if a primary had been held Bill Bolling would have won and McAuliffe would be crushed.
fact or wishful thinking?



I wonder the same. It seems to me like they do not want to win again. Makes me wonder how much of the D-R association is more than it appears on the surface, like a plan to manipulate the elections to give it to someone in particular ...dusterdude wrote:I just dont get why replublicans always run around acting like they are scared,reminds me of a bunch of little girls