Faux is bad because it is (biased) opinion masquerading as news. It also has a very checkered history in the realm of actually reporting facts.zephyp wrote:@Kreutz - what I would like to know is since you think Fox News is so bad, why and compare/contrast that with other news outlets such as MSNBC, etc.
This is not unique to Faux news, check out the shenanigans the News of the World (another Murdoch gem) have been up to. Tampering with investigations of missing people may have led to a death or two. Whoopsie!
Seems right-wingers are simply incapable of objective journalism.
As for MSNBC etc, truth be told they simply lack the checkered history and ballsy lies Faux does. Lets take one off the top of my head, good ole boy-hungry Mark Foley, a Republican from FL. We cant have Republicans trying to pound boys butts, so lets just make him a Democrat.

A simple mistake? Or one that ran several different times over the day on different shows? Either way it proves Faux is at best incompetent and untrustworthy, at worst malicious liars with an agenda.

When MSNBC et al engage in the blatant propaganda masquerading as news will I have ire for them, until then its just Faux News pulling this crap on this scale.



