Page 3 of 5
Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund
Posted: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:03:42
by allingeneral
allingeneral wrote:
Skidmark's Legal Defense Fund
Anyone wishing to contribute should send a check to:
Virginia Legal Defense
P.O. Box 100
Broad Run, Va. 20137
Or contribute via PayPal by clicking below.
Skidmark has been a very active member of the Open Carry movement throughout Virginia and deserves the assistance of any VGOF members who can lend a helping hand.
Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund
Posted: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:14:41
by Mindflayer
CowboyT wrote:That's funny...I had no idea from reading the article that there were any "race" issues at all. If this Poindexter individual really is crying waissism, then it sounds to me like he needs to be fired as a Commonwealth Attorney. Now, just why is this person qualified to carry concealed and get drunk, when I'm not deemed qualified to drink a single glass of wine if I were to carry?
Amen.
Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund
Posted: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:42:52
by VBshooter
I;d like to see Skidmark throw the reverse racism card ,,, Black dudes gangin up on him!! Wonder what Poindexter would say or do then,
Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund
Posted: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:49:08
by fireman836
VBshooter wrote:I;d like to see Skidmark throw the reverse racism card ,,, Black dudes gangin up on him!! Wonder what Poindexter would say or do then,
That would be stooping to their level. Skid needs to stay on the high road. They know they have a weak case and are tilting at windmills (Don Quixote).
Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund
Posted: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:16:01
by Taggure
fireman836 wrote:VBshooter wrote:I;d like to see Skidmark throw the reverse racism card ,,, Black dudes gangin up on him!! Wonder what Poindexter would say or do then,
That would be stooping to their level. Skid needs to stay on the high road. They know they have a weak case and are tilting at windmills (Don Quixote).
Well, hummmm I think I would have to question why if it is as they say the supervisor, the Rent A Cop, the LEO's and Poindexter were all Black; then why would one White dude scare them so much that he would stoop to that level? Just because he pointed a finger, ah hell he was just trying to make a point and say hey Pull my Finger so I can Fart? I don't know it all sounds trumped up to me.
And another thing
Why must Skidmark take the High Road Just because he is a White Guy? That is PC BS and I say Fight Fire With Fire! I would throw it right back on Poindexter that he was the one being the Wassis with the trumped case that he is trying to save face on.
Yes Tweeker call me a wassis (but most here know that I am not)
Vern
Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund
Posted: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:20:48
by VBshooter
I do agree with ya on that, Let;s face it we all know what the other side is attempting and it's the act of cowards who won't man up and admit their mistake(s)...... But as we all know the other side uses / has used it so many times that it would be interesting to see just how it would be handled.. Would the powers that be ignore it or would they rightly act upon it as if the other side submitted it??
Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund
Posted: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:25:20
by Tweaker
I would bet my beautiful, soon to be 4 year old white cracker baby on IGNORE.
Taggure - I have not added you to THE LIST, but consider that corrected...now.
Your friendly neighborhood TweAker
Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund
Posted: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:34:27
by Taggure
Tweaker wrote:I would bet my beautiful, soon to be 4 year old white cracker baby on IGNORE.
Taggure - I have not added you to THE LIST, but consider that corrected...now.
Your friendly neighborhood TweAker
Tweaker
Sorry for the mis-spelling
Well until now I have never given you a reason to add Me to the list, but this is beyond funny and sometimes you just need to stand up against this PC BS and call it for what it is.
Oh By The Way
MERRY CHRISTMAS
Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund
Posted: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:20:17
by gunderwood
Taggure wrote:Tweaker wrote:I would bet my beautiful, soon to be 4 year old white cracker baby on IGNORE.
Taggure - I have not added you to THE LIST, but consider that corrected...now.
Your friendly neighborhood TweAker
Tweaker
Sorry for the mis-spelling
Well until now I have never given you a reason to add Me to the list, but this is beyond funny and sometimes you just need to stand up against this PC BS and call it for what it is.
Oh By The Way
MERRY CHRISTMAS
Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund
Posted: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:15:49
by allingeneral
allingeneral wrote:
Skidmark's Legal Defense Fund
Back to the topic at hand...
Anyone wishing to contribute should send a check to:
Virginia Legal Defense
P.O. Box 100
Broad Run, Va. 20137
Or contribute via PayPal by clicking below.
Skidmark has been a very active member of the Open Carry movement throughout Virginia and deserves the assistance of any VGOF members who can lend a helping hand.
Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund
Posted: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:15:32
by ccbob
allingeneral wrote:allingeneral wrote:
Skidmark's Legal Defense Fund
Back to the topic at hand...
Anyone wishing to contribute should send a check to:
Virginia Legal Defense
P.O. Box 100
Broad Run, Va. 20137
Or contribute via PayPal by clicking below.
Skidmark has been a very active member of the Open Carry movement throughout Virginia and deserves the assistance of any VGOF members who can lend a helping hand.
Keep it active. I cent my dough to help
Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund
Posted: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:26:41
by Kuda
Gave what I can. Please keep the updates coming. When the slush fund grows I will revisit the donation page.
It is sad when a law abiding citizen has to climb through hoops to clear their name when low-lifes break the laws all the time and keep getting lower.
Best of luck.
Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund
Posted: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 21:51:04
by peternap
A lot of you visit OCDO so you know about this already. I spend too much time there, and lurk here once in a while.
There are going to be a lot of Pro 2nd people at the courthouse on the 4th.
The more people, the bigger voice we have. Hopefully this will provide a platform for changes in the General Assembly. If you can swing it, please try to be there.
Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund
Posted: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 23:39:20
by allingeneral
I was really hoping to be there on the 4th, but some stuff has come up at work and I won't be able to break free for the day.
I do wish Paul the very best, and I hope that there is a strong turn-out in his support.
Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund
Posted: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:35:40
by allingeneral
allingeneral wrote:
Skidmark's Legal Defense Fund
Anyone wishing to contribute should send a check to:
Virginia Legal Defense
P.O. Box 100
Broad Run, Va. 20137
Or contribute via PayPal by clicking below.
Skidmark has been a very active member of the Open Carry movement throughout Virginia and deserves the assistance of any VGOF members who can lend a helping hand.
Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund
Posted: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 01:27:52
by hak
funds sent.
Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund
Posted: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:25:32
by LFS
Any news on this case?
Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund
Posted: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:37:22
by allingeneral
No news until after the court date on 4 January, I suppose.
Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund
Posted: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:25:46
by allingeneral
*** UPDATE ***
Paul Henick went to court on 04 January and his case was continued until 15 March 2011. It seems that the prosecutor in the case (the same guy who prosecuted the Michael Vick case) wasn't very prepared and hasn't answered many of the subpoenas and official requests from Skidmark's attorney, Dan Hawes (username "user" on our forums). Additionally, the video tapes of the incident at the Surry Ferry were somehow not removed from rotation and were actually recorded over!
Re: Skidmark Legal Defense Fund
Posted: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:29:48
by gunderwood
allingeneral wrote:*** UPDATE ***
Paul Henick went to court on 04 January and his case was continued until 15 March 2011. It seems that the prosecutor in the case (the same guy who prosecuted the Michael Vick case) wasn't very prepared and hasn't answered many of the subpoenas and official requests from Skidmark's attorney, Dan Hawes (username "user" on our forums). Additionally, the video tapes of the incident at the Surry Ferry were somehow not removed from rotation and were actually recorded over!
So what you're saying is that the state destroyed evidence which didn't support its case.