Page 3 of 3
Re: north korea
Posted: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 09:30:39
by Kreutz
Nuking Pyongyang would not sit well with regional allies who like to breathe air that isn't irradiated with plutonium.
Like a tantrum from my 2 year old son, if you ignore him long enough Kim Jong Fatass will behave.
Re: north korea
Posted: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:37:44
by skeeterss0
DryBones wrote:Iraq or Iran?
to me they are both the same. how about one right on the boarder?
Re: north korea
Posted: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 10:40:19
by DryBones
Considering Iran and North Korea both are working on getting or have nuclear capabilities, why would Iraq fall into this category?

Re: north korea
Posted: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 11:01:49
by skeeterss0
It's not their nuclear capabilities I'd be bombing them for, its their idealogy in general.
Re: north korea
Posted: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 11:09:54
by TheGodfather
skeeterss0 wrote:DryBones wrote:Iraq or Iran?
how about one right on the boarder?
You mean here?

Re: north korea
Posted: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 11:21:51
by OakRidgeStars
You might want to run that by our allies in South Korea before any nukes start falling. It might be a bit messy depending on which way the wind is blowing

Re: north korea
Posted: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 15:52:42
by mamabearCali
We don't need nukes.....they are messy and cause too much collateral damage. If it comes to it....fire bomb Kim Jung Fat Butt's compound and any and every miliatry headquarters in the nation with traditional methods. Then release the prisoners from the concentration camps.
Re: north korea
Posted: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 18:25:06
by CalebDor
United States Military:
"Is this going to be a stand up fight or another bug hunt? "
Secretary of State ( who was in Vietnam by the way) John Kerry
"All we know is that were dealing with a maniacal little fat man and that we cant turn his country into a glass sheet"
United States Military:
"It's a bug hunt...."
Re: north korea
Posted: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 18:59:06
by OakRidgeStars
I don't think the ChiComs are going to let Fatty Whitewalls launch any missiles.

Re: north korea
Posted: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 19:34:33
by mamabearCali
OakRidgeStars wrote:I don't think the ChiComs are going to let Fatty Whitewalls launch any missiles.

This is what I say too. They have too much invested here to let a tantrum ruin the good thing they have going. I may dislike China in many things, but they are the grown up that is going to take this childish tantrum to the woodshed not us.
Re: north korea
Posted: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 08:16:09
by steelheart
Ok here we go. For the good reverend i say praise the lord and pass the ammunition

. For the pro and anti nuke folks their are "tactical" nukes, very nasty tech

. But china takin em out behind the woodshed may be the thing that happens.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ] 
Re: north korea
Posted: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 12:31:01
by OakRidgeStars
Re: north korea
Posted: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 16:45:00
by GeneFrenkle
Why do the north korean military types look like they are wearing _huge_ hats? It's almost comical.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ] 
Re: north korea
Posted: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 18:28:07
by OakRidgeStars
GeneFrenkle wrote:Why do the north korean military types look like they are wearing _huge_ hats? It's almost comical.
Compensating for something, no doubt
