Nuking Pyongyang would not sit well with regional allies who like to breathe air that isn't irradiated with plutonium.
Like a tantrum from my 2 year old son, if you ignore him long enough Kim Jong Fatass will behave.
north korea
-
skeeterss0
- Sharp Shooter
- Posts: 816
- Joined: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:35:54
- Location: Hampton
Re: north korea
to me they are both the same. how about one right on the boarder?DryBones wrote:Iraq or Iran?
USMC 1981-2001 Semper Fi
US Constitution
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
US Constitution
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Re: north korea
Considering Iran and North Korea both are working on getting or have nuclear capabilities, why would Iraq fall into this category? 
-
skeeterss0
- Sharp Shooter
- Posts: 816
- Joined: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:35:54
- Location: Hampton
Re: north korea
It's not their nuclear capabilities I'd be bombing them for, its their idealogy in general.
USMC 1981-2001 Semper Fi
US Constitution
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
US Constitution
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
-
TheGodfather
- VGOF Silver Supporter
- Posts: 937
- Joined: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:19:47
- Location: Gainesville, VA
Re: north korea
You mean here?skeeterss0 wrote:how about one right on the boarder?DryBones wrote:Iraq or Iran?
"I don't talk to Obama voters often. But when I do, I order large fries."
-
OakRidgeStars
- VGOF Gold Supporter
- Posts: 14108
- Joined: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:13:20
Re: north korea
You might want to run that by our allies in South Korea before any nukes start falling. It might be a bit messy depending on which way the wind is blowing 
-
mamabearCali
- VGOF Bronze Supporter
- Posts: 2753
- Joined: Thu, 19 May 2011 16:08:25
Re: north korea
We don't need nukes.....they are messy and cause too much collateral damage. If it comes to it....fire bomb Kim Jung Fat Butt's compound and any and every miliatry headquarters in the nation with traditional methods. Then release the prisoners from the concentration camps.
"I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend."
-
CalebDor
- Sharp Shooter
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:56:42
- Location: Fredericksburg, Virginia
Re: north korea
United States Military:
"Is this going to be a stand up fight or another bug hunt? "
Secretary of State ( who was in Vietnam by the way) John Kerry
"All we know is that were dealing with a maniacal little fat man and that we cant turn his country into a glass sheet"
United States Military:
"It's a bug hunt...."
"Is this going to be a stand up fight or another bug hunt? "
Secretary of State ( who was in Vietnam by the way) John Kerry
"All we know is that were dealing with a maniacal little fat man and that we cant turn his country into a glass sheet"
United States Military:
"It's a bug hunt...."
-
OakRidgeStars
- VGOF Gold Supporter
- Posts: 14108
- Joined: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:13:20
Re: north korea
I don't think the ChiComs are going to let Fatty Whitewalls launch any missiles. 
-
mamabearCali
- VGOF Bronze Supporter
- Posts: 2753
- Joined: Thu, 19 May 2011 16:08:25
Re: north korea
OakRidgeStars wrote:I don't think the ChiComs are going to let Fatty Whitewalls launch any missiles.
This is what I say too. They have too much invested here to let a tantrum ruin the good thing they have going. I may dislike China in many things, but they are the grown up that is going to take this childish tantrum to the woodshed not us.
"I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend."
-
steelheart
- Sharp Shooter
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 04:02:17
Re: north korea
Ok here we go. For the good reverend i say praise the lord and pass the ammunition 
. For the pro and anti nuke folks their are "tactical" nukes, very nasty tech . But china takin em out behind the woodshed may be the thing that happens.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
. For the pro and anti nuke folks their are "tactical" nukes, very nasty tech . But china takin em out behind the woodshed may be the thing that happens.[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
-
OakRidgeStars
- VGOF Gold Supporter
- Posts: 14108
- Joined: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:13:20
-
GeneFrenkle
- Sharp Shooter
- Posts: 1738
- Joined: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 19:19:07
Re: north korea
Why do the north korean military types look like they are wearing _huge_ hats? It's almost comical.
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
[ Post made via Mobile Device ]
And if Bruce Dickinson wants more cowbell, we should probably give him more cowbell!
-
OakRidgeStars
- VGOF Gold Supporter
- Posts: 14108
- Joined: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:13:20
Re: north korea
Compensating for something, no doubtGeneFrenkle wrote:Why do the north korean military types look like they are wearing _huge_ hats? It's almost comical.
